search for: groking

...nts = "1000" } class apache::app includes apache { $maxclients = "25" } Apparently doing it this way causes the content of httpd.conf to only get the base apache value, even though in the other classes it''s set correctly. I''m sure partly I''m not groking scope (it''s late here), but what''s the right way for me to do this. My current alternative is to drop a conf.d/worker.conf with those settings in it and just let them override httpd.conf C -- stickm@gmail.com -==< Stick >==- ___________________________________________...

...e (not as operands). >> 4. Move the helper functions from #2 back into ShuffleVectorSDNode. >> > > I'm working on #2 and #3 right now, and hope to land something in the next > couple days. Details, since this has implications for vector machine backends? I'm just not groking how moving isSplat to SDNode eliminates BUILD_VECTOR or deals with constant vector formation. I like the idea of a ShuffleVectorSDNode (moves things in the direction of a bijective ISD to SDNode mapping), but eliminating BuildVectorSDNode in its entirety doesn't deal with constant and variable...

On Fri, 2015-09-18 at 14:09 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > On Fri, 2015-09-18 at 11:12 -0700, Ming Lin wrote: > > On Thu, 2015-09-17 at 17:55 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > > > On Thu, 2015-09-17 at 16:31 -0700, Ming Lin wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 23:10 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > > > > > Hi Ming & Co, > >

On Fri, 2015-09-18 at 14:09 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > On Fri, 2015-09-18 at 11:12 -0700, Ming Lin wrote: > > On Thu, 2015-09-17 at 17:55 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > > > On Thu, 2015-09-17 at 16:31 -0700, Ming Lin wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 23:10 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > > > > > Hi Ming & Co, > >

On Feb 23, 2009, at 1:46 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > In my opinion, the proper direction for shuffles is: > > 1. Back out your patch. > 2. Move the functionality of "is splat" etc to method somewhere, e.g. > on SDNode. > 3. Introduce a new ShuffleVectorSDNode that only has two SDValue > operands (the two input vectors), but that also contains an array of > ints in

We have a bunch of lists hosted on a CentOS-4.9 server running sendmail and mailman that we are moving to a CentOS-6 vm running postfix and mailman. I am testing the setup and I am running into a problem no doubt caused by my own ignorance wrt postfix. Based on groking the web I discovered that the recommended way to configure postfix to work with mailman is a script called postfix-to-mailman.py. I installed and modified this script to suit our installation. I followed the instructions therein and made the recommended changes to posfix, to wit: # postfix-to-mai...

> Gregory, bind() does support this. It''s my preferred technique. Ah, well, that''s good to know then. I''d always wanted to do it this way, but when I last looked into it, it wasn''t yet supported. That was a while ago, though. Thanks for the heads up. Greg

On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Vladimir Prus wrote: > > Sorry, but it is not even close to working (its template and STL support > > is horribly lacking). The Visual Studio "Whidbey" compiler, now in beta, > > will handle it though with only a reasonable amount of tweaking to the > > LLVM sources. I have no idea about when Microsoft intends to release it > > though,

...v6 patches from Feb 2013. Note they are standalone patches that require a sufficiently old enough LIO + QEMU to actually build + function. https://github.com/Datera/rts-megasas/blob/master/rts_megasas-qemu-v6.patch https://github.com/Datera/rts-megasas/blob/master/rts_megasas-fabric-v6.patch For groking purposes, they demonstrate the principle design for a host kernel level driver, along with the megasas firmware interface (MFI) specific emulation magic that makes up the bulk of the code. Take a look. --nab

On Wed, 2014-08-27 at 20:40 +0930, Rusty Russell wrote: > Hi Andy, > > This has long been a source of contention. virtio assumes that > the hypervisor can decode guest-physical addresses. > > PowerPC, in particular, doesn't want to pay the cost of IOMMU > manipulations, and all arguments presented so far for using an IOMMU for > a virtio device are

On Wed, 2014-08-27 at 20:40 +0930, Rusty Russell wrote: > Hi Andy, > > This has long been a source of contention. virtio assumes that > the hypervisor can decode guest-physical addresses. > > PowerPC, in particular, doesn't want to pay the cost of IOMMU > manipulations, and all arguments presented so far for using an IOMMU for > a virtio device are

Chris Lattner wrote: > On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Bill Wendling wrote: > > I just wanted to know if anyone's looked into using the free version of > > Microsoft's Visual C++ toolkit for LLVM: > > > > http://msdn.microsoft.com/visualc/vctoolkit2003/ > > Sorry, but it is not even close to working (its template and STL support > is horribly lacking). The

On May 6, 2004, at 12:01 AM, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Wed, 5 May 2004, Patrick Flanagan wrote: >>>> and I'm not convinced that GCC is doing a very good job (ie, without >>>> syntactic loops). >>> >>> Yup, this is EXACTLY what is going on. >> >> Interesting. Now that you mention it, I do recall thinking the loops >> that llvm

I'm still learning firewalld obviously, and I am having trouble groking the documentation to understand how to do this. I know I could do an iptables direct, but that doesn't seem like the "right" way to do it. What I'm trying to do is allow a specific service, only for a specific ip. Effectively, SNMP should be allowed form a specific IP address...

I just subscribed to this list and i just wanted to say hello before starting dumb questions about rails. I just started my programming career with a ruby''n''rails application here in italy and i could use some help, and in time, when i will be more skilled, i will be glad to give some help back ;) See you! -- Maurizio Marek idnondisponibile@tin.it

...pe to land something in > the next couple days. > > Details, since this has implications for vector machine backends? It's basically as Chris said; there will be a ShuffleVectorSDNode, and appropriate helper functions, node profile, and DAGCombiner support. > I'm just not groking how moving isSplat to SDNode eliminates > BUILD_VECTOR or deals with constant vector formation. You can have a static method on SDNode that took an SDNode, checked if it was a build vector, and calculated whatever splat information you wanted. There's no need for BuildVectorSDNode fo...

I am trying to implement an ANOVA on a pair of quantile regression models in R. The anova.rq() function performs a basic check to see whether the models are nested, but I think this check is failing in my case. I think my models are nested despite the anova.rqlist() function saying otherwise. Here is an example where the GLM ANOVA regards the models as nested, but the quantile regression ANOVA

Hello -STABLE@, So I've seen this situation seemingly randomly on a number of both physical 9.1 boxes as well as VMs for I would say 6-9 months at least. I finally have a physical box here that reproduces it consistently that I can reboot easily (ie; not a production/client server). No matter what I do: reboot shutdown -p shutdown -r This specific server will stop at "All buffers

On Wed, 5 May 2004, Patrick Flanagan wrote: > >> and I'm not convinced that GCC is doing a very good job (ie, without > >> syntactic loops). > > > > Yup, this is EXACTLY what is going on. > > Interesting. Now that you mention it, I do recall thinking the loops > that llvm generated looked a bit different than the gcc loops. I'll go > back and take

Features: * Management WEBrick - start, stop * Viewing log files * Abbrev from TextMate * Switching between View/Action http://www.emacswiki.org/cgi-bin/emacs/rails.el