search for: groete

Dear all, I have a client who uses Samba 3.0.28 on AIX 5.3 and he is running into problems with the cpu utilization which is 100% caused by one or more smbd processes. I found out that this problem should be solved in version 3.0.37 and want to know if there is a way to get the bff-file of this version. I am not able to compile samba myself on the machine which has the problem and I am

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Try it without any --delete options. On 03/27/2015 09:31 AM, Aron Rotteveel wrote: > I am now running with --delete --numeric-ids --relative but the > problem still persists. > > -- Best regards / Met vriendelijke groet, > > Aron Rotteveel > > 2015-03-27 14:22 GMT+01:00 Kevin Korb <kmk at sanitarium.net >

Hi, I am experiencing segfaults when transferring files via rsync though sudo. Setup: - Backupserver initiates the rsync command with --delete -vvv --no-inc-recursive --numeric-ids --delete-excluded --relative --rsync-path=/home/backupuser/rsync-wrapper.sh - rsync-wrapper.sh (on the client) contains /usr/bin/sudo /usr/bin/rsync "$@"; - user "backupuser" has sudo access to the

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Try also removing --delete-excluded. Without those two options there should be no reason for rsync to require gigs of RAM. Well, unless the other system has rsync 2.x. On 03/27/2015 07:29 AM, Aron Rotteveel wrote: > Yes, I removed "--no-inc-recursive", without success. > > -- Best regards / Met vriendelijke groet, > >

Anyone have any other ideas I could try to debug this issue? :) -- Best regards / Met vriendelijke groet, Aron Rotteveel 2015-03-27 16:02 GMT+01:00 Aron Rotteveel <rotteveel.aron at gmail.com>: > Hi Kevin, > > Just did: same result. > > -- > Best regards / Met vriendelijke groet, > > Aron Rotteveel > > 2015-03-27 14:32 GMT+01:00 Kevin Korb <kmk at

I am using tinc1.0pre1 pre2 is not yet available on the tinc site. The Var. VpnMask is unknown in version pre1. Netmask is 255.0.0.0 on tap0 on both gateways. Still the problem that you can ping the gateway on the other network but not the machines behind it. I've used the rpm download. -----Original Message----- From: Guus Sliepen [mailto:guus@warande3094.warande.uu.nl] Sent: Wednesday, May

Hello, At FOSDEM 2010 (http://fosdem.org/2010/), I will give a lightning talk titled "tinc: the difficulties of a peer-to-peer VPN on the hostile Internet". The talk will probably be on Saturday 7th of Februari at 15:20 CET, but this might still change. If you would like to meet at FOSDEM with me or other persons using or developing tinc, just reply to this email. The abstract of the

Hello, At FOSDEM 2010 (http://fosdem.org/2010/), I will give a lightning talk titled "tinc: the difficulties of a peer-to-peer VPN on the hostile Internet". The talk will probably be on Saturday 7th of Februari at 15:20 CET, but this might still change. If you would like to meet at FOSDEM with me or other persons using or developing tinc, just reply to this email. The abstract of the

Hi Kevin, Just did: same result. -- Best regards / Met vriendelijke groet, Aron Rotteveel 2015-03-27 14:32 GMT+01:00 Kevin Korb <kmk at sanitarium.net>: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Try it without any --delete options. > > On 03/27/2015 09:31 AM, Aron Rotteveel wrote: > > I am now running with --delete --numeric-ids --relative but the

Yes, I removed "--no-inc-recursive", without success. -- Best regards / Met vriendelijke groet, Aron Rotteveel 2015-03-27 12:24 GMT+01:00 Kevin Korb <kmk at sanitarium.net>: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Have you tried removing --no-inc-recursive yet? > > On 03/27/2015 07:19 AM, Aron Rotteveel wrote: > > Hi Roland, > > >

My intention was to sign the content of export-all with the nodes' public key, which would require the corresponding private key to verify. Does this make sense ? @ > Le 26 janv. 2016 ? 20:19, Guus Sliepen <guus at tinc-vpn.org> a ?crit : > >> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 07:35:10PM +0100, Anton Voyl wrote: >> >> Is it possible to sign/verify data with the ed25519

hello guys, i was wondering where and if i can find the xen kernel headers for the latest stable XCP (0.5) i need these because i have to compile a kernel module. Thanks! Peter _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

I am now running with --delete --numeric-ids --relative but the problem still persists. -- Best regards / Met vriendelijke groet, Aron Rotteveel 2015-03-27 14:22 GMT+01:00 Kevin Korb <kmk at sanitarium.net>: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Try also removing --delete-excluded. Without those two options there > should be no reason for rsync to require

Dear all, we have a very strange problem, - we have 3 VPN endpoints - all are in one NETWORK - all daemons come up and connect without any problem and normally we have no problem working through the VPN but in some cases the connection does not work because the traffic leaves the TAP interface on one VPN endpoint but never arrives on the other end, the similarities between the packages seem to

We upgraded from 2.2.3a to 2.2.4 on a SuSE 7.2 server. We compiled Samba just default. The new version seems to work ok with the exception of printer administration. Printer admins are not able to see the properties of the printers (right click on printer gives on error). Our workstations are W2k SP2. But users that are not printer admin are able to see the properties of a printer, but they

With pleasure we announce the release of tinc version 1.1pre13. Here is a summary of the changes: * Fix BSD tun device support that was broken in 1.1pre12. * Speed up AutoConnect when there are many host config files present without an Address. Please note that although tinc 1.1pre13 is backwards compatible with tinc 1.0.x, it is NOT compatible with tinc 1.1pre1 through 1.1pre10. -- Met

On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 05:15:57PM +0800, hshh wrote: > >Updated support for BSD tun/tap devices. > It is broken on FreeBSD tun. > > tcpdump on tun, > 09:05:07.458988 IP0 bad-hlen 0 Can you show me your tinc.conf and tinc-up script? Also, which version of FreeBSD are you using? -- Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards, Guus Sliepen <guus at tinc-vpn.org>

On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 05:26:36PM +0800, hshh wrote: > >> It is broken on FreeBSD tun. > >> > >> tcpdump on tun, > >> 09:05:07.458988 IP0 bad-hlen 0 It's indeed broken. As a workaround, can you try to change Device to /dev/tap10? You might have to run "kldload if_tap.ko" before starting tinc. -- Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards,

With pleasure we announce the release of tinc version 1.1pre13. Here is a summary of the changes: * Fix BSD tun device support that was broken in 1.1pre12. * Speed up AutoConnect when there are many host config files present without an Address. Please note that although tinc 1.1pre13 is backwards compatible with tinc 1.0.x, it is NOT compatible with tinc 1.1pre1 through 1.1pre10. -- Met

I've read that the sm.conf configuration option "ldap filter" is removed after 3.0.14. Why is that? For one of the networks we maintain it is a very crucial option. I could not found an explanation or work around. Met vriendelijke groet/Regards Prompt R.J. Baart Kerkstraat 173 5261CW Vught tel: +31 73 6567041 mailto:R.J.Baart@Prompt.NL