search for: greylisted

I wish to add options to sendmail INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`spamassassin', `S=local:/var/run/spamass-milter/spamass-milter.sock, F=T, T=C:5m;S:4m;R:4m;E:5m')dnl dnl MAILER(cyrusv2)dnl INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`greylist', `S=local:/var/run/milter-greylist/milter-greylist.sock') define(`confMILTER_MACROS_CONNECT', `j, {if_addr}') define(`confMILTER_MACROS_HELO', `{verify},

...led; vendor preset: disabled) Active: active (running) since mer. 2019-06-19 09:39:04 CEST; 19min ago Docs: man:postgrey(8) Process: 5228 ExecStart=/usr/sbin/postgrey --unix=/var/spool/postfix/postgrey/socket --pidfile=/var/run/postgrey.pid --group=postgrey --user=postgrey --greylist-text=Greylisted for %%s seconds --daemonize $POSTGREY_OPTS (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS) Process: 5225 ExecStartPre=/bin/rm -f /var/run/postgrey.pid (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS) Main PID: 5229 (/usr/sbin/postg) CGroup: /system.slice/postgrey.service ??5229 /usr/sbin/postgrey --unix=/var/spool...

Is anyone using Milter-Greylist? Is there a repository out there with an rpm available? JP -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060213/036d4b7e/attachment-0002.html>

I want to remove files but only if they are owned by a certain user and group. Basically I have this: find /var/spool/greylist -mmin +363 -exec rm -f {} \; I want to make sure it only deletes files owned by mail. Basically no matter what weird characters are in the file names I want to make sure it does not delete anything outside of /var/spool/greylist. I can add 'sudo -u' to it but

On Fri, February 13, 2015 11:04 am, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Ken Smith <kens at kensnet.org> wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I'm just wanting to check that my understanding of the settings is >> correct >> as my web searches are finding a lot of dated information. >> >> If I want a Centos 6 sendmail system act as the

On Fri, February 13, 2015 11:52 am, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Valeri Galtsev > <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: >> >>> Otherwise it accept junk that your primary rejects >> >> Not exactly. If greylisting on primary is set, but on backup MX is not, >> still what is killed by greylisting by primary MX, almost never

...Active: active (running) since mer. 2019-06-19 09:39:04 CEST; 19min > ago > Docs: man:postgrey(8) > Process: 5228 ExecStart=/usr/sbin/postgrey > --unix=/var/spool/postfix/postgrey/socket > --pidfile=/var/run/postgrey.pid --group=postgrey --user=postgrey > --greylist-text=Greylisted for %%s seconds --daemonize $POSTGREY_OPTS > (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS) > Process: 5225 ExecStartPre=/bin/rm -f /var/run/postgrey.pid > (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS) > Main PID: 5229 (/usr/sbin/postg) > CGroup: /system.slice/postgrey.service > ??5229 /usr/s...

...; Active: active (running) since mer. 2019-06-19 09:39:04 CEST; 19min ago > Docs: man:postgrey(8) > Process: 5228 ExecStart=/usr/sbin/postgrey > --unix=/var/spool/postfix/postgrey/socket > --pidfile=/var/run/postgrey.pid --group=postgrey --user=postgrey > --greylist-text=Greylisted for %%s seconds --daemonize $POSTGREY_OPTS > (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS) > Process: 5225 ExecStartPre=/bin/rm -f /var/run/postgrey.pid > (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS) > Main PID: 5229 (/usr/sbin/postg) > CGroup: /system.slice/postgrey.service > ??5229 /u...

Hi, all. I want to use grey list in mail server, currently, i use postgrey to implement it. Any other recommended software? Thanks very much. ----- Best Regards. Zhang Huangbin - OpenBSD 4.2 -release, i386. - RHEL 5.1

what anti-spam for you used ? dspam?spammassian? amavisd-new ? what is best ?

Les Mikesell wrote: > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Valeri Galtsev > <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: >>> Otherwise it accept junk that your primary rejects >> Not exactly. If greylisting on primary is set, but on backup MX is not, >> still what is killed by greylisting by primary MX, almost never will come >> through backup MX. This is due to the

On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 02:43:30PM -0400, Fred Smith wrote: > On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 02:38:05PM -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 10:19:49AM -0400, mark wrote: > > > Fred Smith wrote: > > > > On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 09:28:23AM -0400, mark wrote: > > > <MVNCH> > > > > One thing I don't understand is how/why the

On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 05:02:03PM +0800, Plutocrat wrote: > On 11/06/2020 16.26, Marc Roos wrote: > > I know it is not dovecot who should fix this. But anyone using dovecot > > is using an MTA, and receiving spam ;) I know how to look at email > > headers. Spf and dkim is not solving anything here. > > You can configure this sort of thing in postfix, exim etc. The

Howdy. Over at http://greylisting.org/implementations/sendmail.shtml they list 5 different implementations - 1 perl and 4 C based. Does any one know if one is better than the other? Does it make a difference? Is it just a matter of preference? Thanks. Zyxian _________________________________ I learn more when something goes wrong...

On Sun, Jun 07, 2020 at 05:53:28AM -0700, John Pierce wrote: > On Sun, Jun 7, 2020, 2:47 AM Nicolas Kovacs <info at microlinux.fr> wrote: > > > .... > > My aim is simply to eliminate as much spam as possible (that is, before > > adding > > SpamAssassin) while keeping false positives to a minimum. > > > > The one thing that stopped the most spam on

Hello all, About a year ago I set up a mail server on CentOS using this howto: http://wanderingbarque.com/howtos/mailserver/mailserver.html I managed to add amavisd-new with clamav and spamassassin. It runs very well, but it runs on CentOS 5.2, and if I try to upgrade, amavisd-new and clamav break. we are now also at the point where a backup mx will need to be implemented. If necessary I am

On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: > >> Otherwise it accept junk that your primary rejects > > Not exactly. If greylisting on primary is set, but on backup MX is not, > still what is killed by greylisting by primary MX, almost never will come > through backup MX. This is due to the same reason why greylisting is >

On Fri, February 13, 2015 12:18 pm, Ken Smith wrote: > Les Mikesell wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Valeri Galtsev >> <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: >>>> Otherwise it accept junk that your primary rejects >>> Not exactly. If greylisting on primary is set, but on backup MX is not, >>> still what is killed by greylisting by

Whats a good antispam solution? I am using sendmail and dovecot 1.1. I came across dovecot's antispam plugin, but it seems it does not support 1.1 yet. I am also looking for something non-perl based. I am already doing some greylisting with sendmail milter. Any other good suggestions? If not, I guess I might have to downgrade back to 1.0 dovecot. Thanks

...9 jessie postfix/smtpd[6714]: connect from mk-outboundfilter-4-a-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com[212.74.114.8] Dec 17 21:23:49 jessie postfix/smtpd[6714]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from mk-outboundfilter-4-a-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com[212.74.114.8]: 450 4.2.0 <ned at example.com>: Recipient address rejected: Greylisted, see http://postgrey.schweikert.ch/help/example.com.html; from=<bob at example.com> to=<ned at example.com> proto=ESMTP helo=<mk-outboundfilter-4-a-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com> Dec 17 21:23:54 jessie postfix/smtpd[6714]: disconnect from mk-outboundfilter-4-a-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com[21...