search for: gregp

Displaying 19 results from an estimated 19 matches for "gregp".

Did you mean: greg
2006 Apr 22
2
[LLVMdev] Re: Building CFE on MinGW
Is the MinGW user's list on the web? Can you give me a link to the thread? (What's IIRC?) Thanks. On Sat, 22 Apr 2006, Oscar Fuentes wrote: > Greg Pettyjohn <gregp at ccs.neu.edu> writes: > > > I've blown a couple of weekends trying to build under MinGW. > > > > I can build the llvm tools with only a couple of minor hassles, but can't > > seem to make any headway with the C Front End > > > > Most errors I run...
2006 Apr 23
3
[LLVMdev] Re: Building CFE on MinGW
...R --includedir=/C/msys/1.0/mingw/include --libdir=/C/msys/1.0/mingw/lib --target=mingw32 $confopts make CFLAGS=-O LIBCFLAGS+=-g LIBCFLAGS+=-O2 LIBCXXFLAGS+=-g LIBCXXFLAGS+=-O2 LIBCXXFLAGS+=-fno-implicit-templates LDFLAGS=-s all On Sun, 23 Apr 2006, Oscar Fuentes wrote: > Greg Pettyjohn <gregp at ccs.neu.edu> writes: > > > Is the MinGW user's list on the web? > > Look on www.mingw.org -> mailing list > > > Can you give me a link to the thread? > > Sorry, no time for that. Once on the mailing list archives, do a > search for 'configure'....
2006 Apr 22
0
[LLVMdev] Re: Building CFE on MinGW
Greg Pettyjohn <gregp at ccs.neu.edu> writes: > I've blown a couple of weekends trying to build under MinGW. > > I can build the llvm tools with only a couple of minor hassles, but can't > seem to make any headway with the C Front End > > Most errors I run into involve not being able to fin...
2006 Apr 22
0
[LLVMdev] Re: Building CFE on MinGW
Greg Pettyjohn <gregp at ccs.neu.edu> writes: > Is the MinGW user's list on the web? Look on www.mingw.org -> mailing list > Can you give me a link to the thread? Sorry, no time for that. Once on the mailing list archives, do a search for 'configure'. > (What's IIRC?) If I Remember C...
2006 Apr 23
1
[LLVMdev] Re: Building CFE on MinGW
Thanks. I'll try some of this. Further comments in-line: On Sun, 23 Apr 2006, Oscar Fuentes wrote: > Greg Pettyjohn <gregp at ccs.neu.edu> writes: > > > I'm using a little shell script: > [snip] > > confopts="--prefix=$PREFIX" > > confopts="$confopts --disable-threads" > > confopts="$confopts --disable-nls" > > confopts="$confopts --d...
2006 Apr 23
0
[LLVMdev] Re: Building CFE on MinGW
Greg Pettyjohn <gregp at ccs.neu.edu> writes: > I'm using a little shell script: [snip] > confopts="--prefix=$PREFIX" > confopts="$confopts --disable-threads" > confopts="$confopts --disable-nls" > confopts="$confopts --disable-shared" > confopt...
2006 Apr 22
3
[LLVMdev] Building CFE on MinGW
I've blown a couple of weekends trying to build under MinGW. I can build the llvm tools with only a couple of minor hassles, but can't seem to make any headway with the C Front End Most errors I run into involve not being able to find header files. The most frustrating part is that the error messages report that the file can't be found, and then proceed to give a path to where the
2003 Mar 26
1
problems compiling Samba 2.2.8 on Solaris 2.8
Hi - I am trying to compile and install 2.2.8 to /opt/samba, but I keep getting the following errors after I 'make install' and try to start smbd using '/opt/samba/sbin/smbd -d 2 -D -s /opt/samba/lib/smb.conf': Unable to open new log file /usr/local/samba/var/log.smbd: No such file or directory [2003/03/25 10:21:56, 0] lib/debug.c:reopen_logs(348) Unable to open new log file
2006 May 07
0
[LLVMdev] Configuring for the cfrontend build on Mingw
...bc -DL_muldi3 -isystem c:/msys/1.0/mingw32/include -isystem c:/msys/1.0/mingw32/sys-include -isystem ./include ../../llvm-gcc/gcc/libgcc2.c -quiet -dumpbase libgcc2.c -auxbase-str ip libgcc/./_muldi3.o -g -O2 -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -version -o C:/DOCUME~1/ GREGPE~1/LOCALS~1/Temp/cca0aaaa.s ignoring nonexistent directory "c:/msys/1.0/mingw32/bin/include" ignoring nonexistent directory "c:/msys/1.0/mingw32/lib/include" ignoring nonexistent directory "c:/msys/1.0/mingw32/include" ignoring nonexistent directory "c:/msys/1.0/m...
2006 May 10
0
[LLVMdev] GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES during CFE build on MinGW
Still trying to build the cfrontend on MinGW: checking for additional debug build... no checking for extra compiler flags for building... checking for sys/types.h... (cached) yes checking locale.h usability... yes checking locale.h presence... yes checking for locale.h... yes checking float.h usability... yes checking float.h presence... yes checking for float.h... yes checking for main in -lm...
2005 Apr 19
1
[LLVMdev] Unwind example
I'm trying to figure out the unwind primitive. I've written a program which should: 1. Recursively grow the stack until it reaches a threshold 2. Then unwind and print a message Instead what happens is: 1. Recursively grow the stack until it reaches a threshold 2. Then it dies with: Abort trap Can you point me to an example using uwind that "works" ? Thanks. Here's the
2005 Apr 20
2
[LLVMdev] setjmp, longjmp and unwind
I'm trying to get unwind to work. I was unable to get an unwind example to work directly, so I decided to compile a c program that uses setjmp and longjmp and work backwards. I keep running into a "Abort trap" problem, whatever "Abort trap" is. Anyway, here's an example of a C program that compiles and works properly under normal gcc, but that fails with an
2006 Apr 30
0
[LLVMdev] Building LLVM under Mingw. Part I: tools-only
BTW: I've also had to make this change when building tools. (I'm building right now and noticed that it doesn't come up anymore, maybe someone checked it in in the last week or so) On Sat, 29 Apr 2006, Anton Korobeynikov wrote: > Hello, Jeff. > > You wrote Saturday, April 29, 2006, 10:45:02 PM: > > JC> Yes, I know mingw doesn't support dbghelp. I can still rant
2005 Apr 20
1
[LLVMdev] setjmp, longjmp and unwind
First I try it with bytecodes: ~/compiler/temp$ llvmgcc sjmp01.c -o sjmp01 ~/compiler/temp$ ./sjmp01 Hello World! Abort trap Same results for lli sjmp01.bc Now I try converting to native code: ~/compiler/temp$ llc sjmp01.bc -enable-correct-eh-support -o sjmp01.s ~/compiler/temp$ gcc sjmp01.s -o sjmp01.native ~/compiler/temp$ ./sjmp01.native Hello World! Bus error ~/compiler/temp$ On Apr 20,
2006 May 13
1
[LLVMdev] Building Tools on MinGW from CVS
I was building tools just fine last weekend, but now something has changed... The problem is that it can't find some symbols: (SymSetOptions, SymInitialize, SymGetModuleBase, SymFunctionTableAccess, etc.) I looked on the Web and these functions are in Dbghelp.lib. Are they also in libimagehlp.a? (BTW: does someone know a tool to examin the exported symbols in a MinGW foo.a library?)
2006 May 06
0
[LLVMdev] Still Trying to Build on MINGW
On Sat, 6 May 2006, Greg Pettyjohn wrote: > Now I'm having problems with this: > > llvm-ar rc ./libgcc.a libgcc/./_muldi3.o <and-lots-more-.o-files...> > C:\msys\1.0\home\llvm_home\install\bin\llvm-ar.exe: <invalid>: path is not valid > I've tracked this down in the debugger. It is indeed a bug. The problem is that Path::isValid() will reject a string
2006 May 07
2
[LLVMdev] The Next Win32 File System Problem
Fixing one bug uncovers the next one... To reproduce: llvm-ar rc ./libgcc.a libgcc/./_muldi3.o <and-lots-more-.o-files...> The result: C:\msys\1.0\home\llvm_home\install\bin\llvm-ar.exe: Can't move './libgcc.a-000003' to './libgcc.a-000002': Cannot create a file when that file already exists. So apparently, we're trying to move one file on top of another. The
2006 May 06
4
[LLVMdev] Still Trying to Build on MINGW
1. I got the tools to build. Yay! 2. I got past all the annoying trouble with not finding header files. Yay! Now I'm having problems with this: llvm-ar rc ./libgcc.a libgcc/./_muldi3.o <and-lots-more-.o-files...> C:\msys\1.0\home\llvm_home\install\bin\llvm-ar.exe: <invalid>: path is not valid I'm investigating this with the debugger and so far I've learned that
2005 May 10
0
[LLVMdev] Scheme + LLVM JIT
LLVM list, I bumped into Alex Friedman in the hall today and by coincidence he mentioned that they were switching to LLVM for their PLT Scheme JIT project. I had evaluated LLVM a few weeks ago for my own purposes, but decided that it was too C/C++ centered and that critical features such as tail call optimization and other stack manipulation features were likely stagnant. So naturally I asked