search for: greenhil

Displaying 17 results from an estimated 17 matches for "greenhil".

Did you mean: greenhill
2016 Nov 22
1
Problem with multiple ldap passdb
...d#011session=WTLjLuRB9QBRlIlQ#011lip=51.254.222.112#011rip=81.148.137.80#011lport=143#011rport=56821#011resp=AG1hcnRpbi53aGVsZG9uQGdyXWVuaGlsbHMtaXQuY28udWsAQ3JhY2spbk4wdw== (previous base64 data may contain sensitive data) Nov 22 13:59:38 he01-imap-01 dovecot: auth: Debug: ldap(martin.wheldon at greenhills-it.co.uk,81.148.137.80,<WTLjLuRB9QBRlIlQ>): bind search: base=dc=greenhills-it,dc=co,dc=uk filter=(&(&(ukFirmGhITAccSrvcs=Email)(ukFirmGhITAccLocked=Email-FALSE))(|(uidNumber=martin.wheldon at greenhills-it.co.uk)(mail=martin.wheldon at greenhills-it.co.uk))) Nov 22 13:59:38 he01...
2003 Feb 24
6
what's on port 139
Having trouble with Samba. The config file passes the test (testparm) The Server seems to be upa and running fine (smbclient -L localhost) But can't seem to connect to it from other computers (running 2000 or 98) They were able to connect once though. What should be listed on port 139 in services. We have : netbios-ssn Does this sound right? Appreciate any help/suggestions!! Regards, Andrew
2005 Dec 02
3
[Bug 1129] sshd hangs for command-only invocations due to fork/child signals
...s Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.2p1 Platform: ix86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org ReportedBy: mak-openssh-bugs at greenhills.co.uk I've encountered a problem similar (or identical to) 967, but in a modern version, and with more details. I found a problem where executing ssh with a command (`ssh host date` would often hang. Debugging sshd I found that do_exec_no_pty() calls do_child() after the fork(), and that...
2013 Feb 08
2
[LLVMdev] optimizing references within a struct
There is an optimization which the Greenhills compiler does for mips16. I have not looked at it myself ,but it was recounted to me. The basic idea is that if you have a large struct, rather than reference each element from the base of the struct, it's possible to chose some optimal point(s) that are not at the beginning of the struc...
2006 Feb 12
2
[Bug 1129] sshd hangs for command-only invocations due to fork/child signals
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1129 ------- Comment #4 from djm at mindrot.org 2006-02-12 12:41 ------- Created an attachment (id=1065) --> (http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=1065&action=view) Move debug from signal handler I think we should just remove the debug from it signal handler. It is not safe on platforms that don't implement syslog_r properly.
2008 Nov 28
1
MixMonitor with non-20ms packets
Hi, MixMonitor saves partial conversation when non-standard voice packet size is set (Asterisk 1.4.18.1). For example, if SIP-peer has alaw:30 then saved file would contain only 67% of total conversation. With alaw:20 MixMonitor saves 100% of conversation. It seems that MixMonitor has hardcoded "packets per second" or "samples per packet" values. I did a lot of googling, but
2008 Nov 28
0
[SPAM] - Asterisk and S-Bus - Email found in subject
...w to configure them to use that channel. Has anyone ever tried such a configuration here that might be able to give me a few pointers? Any and all help is much appreciated. Thanks. Kind Regards, Steven Moughan ------------------------------------------------- LAKE Communications, Beech House, Greenhills Road, Dublin 24, IRELAND int. +353 1 4031112 fax. +353 1 452 0826 www.lakecommunications.com ************************************************************************************ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or ent...
2013 Feb 08
0
[LLVMdev] optimizing references within a struct
This sounds similar to what the LocalStackSlotAllocation pass does (lib/CodeGen/LocalStackSlotAllocation.cpp). -Jim On Feb 7, 2013, at 4:56 PM, reed kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: > There is an optimization which the Greenhills compiler does for mips16. > > I have not looked at it myself ,but it was recounted to me. > > The basic idea is that if you have a large struct, rather than reference each element from the base of the struct, it's possible to chose some optimal point(s) that are not at the begi...
2016 Feb 04
3
Evaluating a port to RTEMS (embedded OS with single address space and no processes)
Am 04.02.2016 um 14:46 schrieb Roland Mainz: > On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Christian Mauderer > <christian.mauderer at embedded-brains.de> wrote: >> I am searching a SSH server for remote administration of an embedded >> application running on RTEMS (https://www.rtems.org). This environment >> has neither virtual memory nor user and kernel space. So this is like
2013 Feb 08
1
[LLVMdev] optimizing references within a struct
...reuse those ideas for structs. i'm going to turn on the localstackallocation soon . maybe i need to study that and write something similar for plain structs. > > On Feb 7, 2013, at 4:56 PM, reed kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: > >> There is an optimization which the Greenhills compiler does for mips16. >> >> I have not looked at it myself ,but it was recounted to me. >> >> The basic idea is that if you have a large struct, rather than reference each element from the base of the struct, it's possible to chose some optimal point(s) that are n...
2017 Mar 14
2
[cfe-dev] proposal - pragma section directive in clang
...pecific, we've > invented a less ARM-specific syntax. Bikeshedding is expected and > welcome. > > #pragma clang section bss(".mybss") rodata(".myrodata") > data(".mydata") text(".mytext") There's some prior art in the GreenHills compiler too, where the example above would be spelled: #pragma ghs section bss=".mybss", rodata=".myrodata", data=".mydata", text=".mytext" Maybe it's worth using that syntax, i.e: #pragma clang section bss=".mybss", rodata=&quot...
2017 Mar 14
2
[cfe-dev] proposal - pragma section directive in clang
...nvented a less ARM-specific syntax. Bikeshedding is expected and > > welcome. > > > > #pragma clang section bss(".mybss") rodata(".myrodata") > > data(".mydata") text(".mytext") > > There's some prior art in the GreenHills compiler too, where the example > above would be spelled: > > #pragma ghs section bss=".mybss", rodata=".myrodata", > data=".mydata", text=".mytext" > > Maybe it's worth using that syntax, i.e: > > #pragma clang section...
2017 Mar 10
3
[cfe-dev] proposal - pragma section directive in clang
+llvm-dev properly this time. On Fri, 10 Mar 2017 at 09:42 James Molloy <james at jamesmolloy.co.uk> wrote: > Hi Reid, all, > > +llvm-dev as this RFC involves changes in Clang and LLVM. > > This RFC has stagnated and I think that's partially because the proposal > isn't particularly elegant and is light on details. We've been having a > rethink and have a
2016 Nov 30
0
Sieve script won't compile. Compiler output isn't helpful.
Hi Steven, I think you may be missing the :contains from the two header lines below: > if anyof (header "From" "store-news at amazon.com", > envelope :contains "From" "menswearhouse.com", > envelope :contains "From" "officedepot.com", > envelope :contains "From"
2016 Nov 30
0
Sieve script won't compile. Compiler output isn't helpful.
Hi Steven, OK a on closer inspection :) You are missing a closing double quote on line 59: > fileinto :create "Lists/Debain/News; should be: fileinto :create "Lists/Debain/News"; Best Regards Martin On 2016-11-30 09:30, Steven Mainor wrote: > Hey martin, > > Thanks for the reply! I made the changes you suggested but I got the > same results. > >
2017 Jun 07
0
Dovecot LDAP using custom field to allow users to connect
Hi Michael, We do exactly that see example below: user_filter = (&(&(objectClass=ukFirmGhITPerson)(ukFirmGhITAccSubSrvcs=Email)(ukFirmGhITAccLocked=Email-FALSE))(|(uidNumber=%u)(mail=%u)(ukFirmGhITAccMailAlias=%u))) pass_filter = (&(&(objectClass=ukFirmGhITPerson)(ukFirmGhITAccSubSrvcs=Email)(ukFirmGhITAccLocked=Email-FALSE))(|(uidNumber=%u)(mail=%u))) Does it work without the
2017 Jun 07
1
Dovecot LDAP using custom field to allow users to connect
Hi Michael, Just noticed you are using auth_bind_userdn which we don't. I think you may need to use pass_filter rather than user_filter?? Best Regards Martin On 2017-06-07 10:59, Martin Wheldon wrote: > Hi Michael, > > We do exactly that see example below: > > user_filter = >