Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "greathouse".
2019 Oct 09
0
[PATCH RFC v4 14/16] drm, cgroup: Introduce lgpu as DRM cgroup resource
On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 8:52 PM Greathouse, Joseph
<Joseph.Greathouse at amd.com> wrote:
>
> > From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch> On Behalf Of Daniel Vetter
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 9, 2019 11:07 AM
> > On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 03:53:42PM +0000, Kuehling, Felix wrote:
> > > On 2019-1...
2008 Nov 12
1
different results with plot.lm vs. plot.lm(which=c(2))
I am running GLM models using the gamma family. For example:
model <-glm(y ~ x, family=Gamma(link="identity"))
I am getting different results for the normal Q-Q plot and the
Scale-Location plot if I run the diagnostic plots without specifying the
plot vs. if I specify the plot ... e.g., "plot(model)" gives me a different
Normal Q-Q graph than "plot(model,
2008 Dec 22
0
R 2.8.1 is released
...Pmy_printer").
Informative error messages are given if running latex or dvips
fail.
o Using plot.lm() on a "glm" object since 2.7.1 with which=5
caused the Pearson rather than deviance residuals to be used
in which=2 or 3 (including in the default case). (Thanks to
Effie Greathouse and Greg Snow.)
plot.lm() did not report on omitting observations with
leverage one if they also had residual exactly zero. This was
seen in example(occupationalStatus).
o deparse(nlines=) no longer pads short results with blank
lines. (PR#13299)
o legend(xpd=) now restores 'x...
2008 Dec 22
0
R 2.8.1 is released
...Pmy_printer").
Informative error messages are given if running latex or dvips
fail.
o Using plot.lm() on a "glm" object since 2.7.1 with which=5
caused the Pearson rather than deviance residuals to be used
in which=2 or 3 (including in the default case). (Thanks to
Effie Greathouse and Greg Snow.)
plot.lm() did not report on omitting observations with
leverage one if they also had residual exactly zero. This was
seen in example(occupationalStatus).
o deparse(nlines=) no longer pads short results with blank
lines. (PR#13299)
o legend(xpd=) now restores 'x...
2008 Nov 12
0
different results with plot.glm vs. plot.glm(which=c(2))
I am running GLM models using the gamma family. For example:
model <-glm(y ~ x, family=Gamma(link="identity"))
I am getting different results for the normal Q-Q plot and the
Scale-Location plot if I run the diagnostic plots without specifying the
plot vs. specifying the plot ... e.g., "plot(model)" gives me a different
Normal Q-Q graph than "plot(model,