search for: greaters

On 10-Oct-16 06:45, Aki Tuomi wrote: > Does your build end at some particular point? See **** DETAILS **** for in depth (I hope enough!) study/report. > > Aki I would guess this is not "c99" way... Making all in lib-http source='test-http-auth.c' object='test-http-auth.o' libtool=no DEPDIR=.deps depmode=xlc /bin/sh ../../depcomp xlc_r

On 09-Oct-16 22:51, Aki Tuomi wrote: >> >> Michael > > Does the compiler support C99 standard? > > Aki Yes. Plus extended features. Key difference with GCC, e.g., are the flags to the compiler, but autotools general manages those well. Key difference with platform (well, of of) is that it is not GNU, and how shared libraries are built. Again, libtool in particular,

Is there anything mongrel cluster gives you that monit doesn''t? I''ll be using monit to monitor a number of other services anyways, so it seems logical to just use it for everything including mongrel. Chris

Hi, I am a little new in R but I'm finding it extremely useful :) Here's my tiny question: I've got a table with a lot of columns. What I am interested now is to evaluate how many of 4 columns have a value greater than 1. I think it can be done with subset() but it will take a very long condition and become unfeasible if I want to compare more than 4 columns. I put here a small

Hello all, So, I''ve been using monit with mongrel for a while now, since the 0.3.x days (I think it was). It used to work fine, but now I seem to be having some trouble. I''m currently using mongrel 1.0.1 and I am using the same monit configuration I''ve always been using, yet everytime monit should restart mongrel, I get "Execution failed". For the start

Hi. I finally decided it was really time to stop being lazy and really move away from gmail. After I have a server in my basement using power, etc. So I turned on the imap provided - and did not quite cry - it will have to do for now, but imap2 is wanting. A real server yes, but not Linux. (Using linux would require another server AND I would feel I am being lazy again). So, I downloaded

Hi There, Using t.test to test hypothesis about which one is greater, A or B? where A={10,20,30},B={25,30,15}. My question is which of the following conclusions is right? #################hypothesis testing 1 h0: A greater than or equal to B h1: A less than B below is splus code A=c(10,20,30) B=c(25,30,15) t.test(c(10,20,30),c(25,30,15),alternative="less") output: p-value=0.3359

Hi, I'm trying to run a permutation test on paired samples. First I tried the package "exactRankTests": require("exactRankTests") x <- c(1.83,0.50,1.62,2.48,1.68,1.88,1.55,3.06,1.30) y <- c(0.878,0.647,0.598,2.05,1.06,1.29,1.06,3.14,1.29) wilcox.test(x,y,paired = TRUE,alternative = "greater") perm.test(y,x,paired = TRUE,exact = TRUE,alternative =

Hi all, Consider this C code: #include <stdbool.h> bool func(int n1, int n2, bool b) { bool greater = n1 > n2; if (greater && b) { if (n1 == n2) { return false; // unreachable } } return true; } The line marked unreachable cannot be reached, however currently LLVM does not optimize it out. I believe this is because LLVM does not

On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 6:45 PM, Daniel Berlin via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 6:09 PM, Carlos Liam via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Consider this C code: >> >> #include <stdbool.h> >> >> bool func(int n1, int n2, bool b) { >>

Hello r-group I have a question to the ks.test. I would expect different values for less and greater between data1 and data2. Does anybody could explain my point of misunderstanding the function? data1<-c(8,12,43,70) data2<- c(70,43,12,8) ks.test(data1,"pnorm") ks.test(data1,"pnorm",alternative ="less") #expected < 0.001

Some doxygen annotations are attached to the wrong entry, which can be misleading. This patch fixes the mistake everywhere I could find it. --- include/llvm/InstrTypes.h | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- include/llvm/MC/MCDirectives.h | 42 +++++++++++++++--------------- include/llvm/Pass.h | 10 +++--- 3 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-) diff

On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 6:09 PM, Carlos Liam via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi all, > > Consider this C code: > > #include <stdbool.h> > > bool func(int n1, int n2, bool b) { > bool greater = n1 > n2; > if (greater && b) { > if (n1 == n2) { > return false; // unreachable > } >

Whether I like it or not I need to get a version of PHP that is greater than 5.2.1 as the latest SugarCRM version require this and as I am a module developer I need to have one of the later versions of PHP on my machines. Does anyone know of a reliable and good archive for PHP that provides higher versions than the ones supplied by the upstream provider? Thanks Jobst -- 'Two things

Hello, I'm running linear regressions using the following script where I have separated out species using the "IDtotsInLn" identifier x<-read.csv('tbl02TOTSInLn_ENV.csv', header=T) x attach (x) library(lme4) rInLn<-lmList(InLn~pMoist | IDtotsInLn, x, pool=F)

Hello everyone, I want to plot a "greater than" symbol (the "_" under ">") on the x-axis in the labels. Is it possible to do it? Thanks. Bingshan [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

hi all, i have one issue with the greater than operator ,how should i use greater than operator ? i have condition <%if @c_page > 5%> it giving error ''undefined method `>'' for nil:NilClass'' thanks in advanced Regards Sachin -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to

Hey all, first time poster here. I'm new to R and working on my first real programming and forecasting asignment. I'm using unemployment data from 1948-2012. I successfully completed part a and the linear fit for part b, but i am really struggling fitting a polynomial with a power greater than 2 to my forecast. I'll upload my R code at the bottom. Any help is very much appreciated!

The problem occurs when the sample odds ratio is Inf, such as in the following example. Given the fact that both upper bounds of the two 95% confidence intervals are Inf, I would have expected that the two lower bounds be equal, but they aren't. x <- matrix(c(9,4,0,2),2,2) x # [,1] [,2] #[1,] 9 0 #[2,] 4 2 rbind("two.sided.95CI"=fisher.test(x)$conf.int,

PropagateEquality in gvn.cpp However, if you are going to do it, remember the goal is to make the code simpler and easier, not just pile on to the current mess to catch more cases :) On Mon, Jul 4, 2016, 7:51 AM Carlos Liam <carlos at aarzee.me> wrote: > Where would I look to change the equality propagation? > > > - CL > > On Jun 30, 2016, at 11:45 PM, Daniel Berlin