search for: greater_than_or_equal_to

In the model I have: validates :square_meters_public_land, :barrier_meters, :numericality => { :greater_than_or_equal_to => 0 }, :allow_nil => true but if, in the field, on create, I don''t insert a value I have the error "field is not a number". -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send em...

Hello, I have this in my spec it { should validate_numericality_of(:amount).greater_than_or_equal_to(0) } but I get error: Failure/Error: it { should validate_numericality_of(:amount).greater_than_or_equal_to(0) } NoMethodError: undefined method `greater_than_or_equal_to'' for #<RSpec::Matchers::Matcher:0xef23150> this page http://remarkable.rubyforge.org/activerecord/...

It seems that the validations for: greater_than greater_than_or_equal_to less_than less_than_or_equal_to equal_to odd even Simply do not work (Rails 2.0.2). I''ve tried every combination I can think of and these never seem to fire. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &q...

...dates_uniqueness end attribute :code_alpha3, :string do |a| a.validates_length :is => 3 a.validates_format :with => /\A[A-Z]+\z/ a.validates_uniqueness end attribute :phone_code, :integer, :allow_nil => true do |a| a.validates_numericality :greater_than_or_equal_to => 1, :less_than_or_equal_to => 9999 end end The advantage of this it DRYs up the validation rules since you don''t have to specify the name of the attribute over and over. Plus it automatically sets validates_presence_of for the attribute unless you set allow_nil as true -...

hello, I would like to assert that an attribute of a model has value among those in an array. How would I do it in rspec? Something like this... describe OptionType do context "shoulda validations" do it { assert_contains :type, [''Type1'', ''Type1'']} end end

...greater than zero." But this doesn''t seem to be catching values set to zero or negative values. Am I using this correctly? NOTE: I have the same problem with the "" option so I assume it is something generally I''m doing wrong. validates_numericality_of :value, :greater_than_or_equal_to => 0, :only_integer => true, :allow_nil => true, :message => "Cannot use a negative or fractional number." --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. T...

...ing "AND" condition to retrieve only the teachers having classes all 3 days rather taking as "OR" condition. Sunspot.search(Teacher) do with(:day, "Monday") with(:day, "Tuesday") with(:day, "Wednesday") with(:start_time).greater_than_or_equal_to("2:00pm") with(:end_time).less_than_or_equal_to("5:00pm") end.results I am using solr version 3.5 and sunspot_rails (2.0.0) and sunspot_solr (2.0.0) gems for solr in rails and my rails version is 3.2.6 -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this...

...# FIXME make this able to be v4 or v6 address diff --git a/src/app/models/nic.rb b/src/app/models/nic.rb index 51425bc..18218a3 100644 --- a/src/app/models/nic.rb +++ b/src/app/models/nic.rb @@ -53,6 +53,8 @@ class Nic < ActiveRecord::Base validates_numericality_of :bandwidth, :greater_than_or_equal_to => 0 + NIC_MODELS = ["ne2k_pci","i82551","i82557b","i82559er","rtl8139","e1000","pcnet","virtio"] + # Returns whether the nic has networking defined. def networking? (network != nil) diff --git a/src/ap...

...ActiveRecord::Base validates_format_of :uuid, :with => %r([a-f0-9]{8}-[a-f0-9]{4}-[a-f0-9]{4}-[a-f0-9]{4}-[a-f0-9]{12}) - FORWARD_VNC_PORT_START = 5901 - - validates_numericality_of :forward_vnc_port, - :message => 'must be >= ' + FORWARD_VNC_PORT_START.to_s, - :greater_than_or_equal_to => FORWARD_VNC_PORT_START, - :if => Proc.new { |vm| vm.forward_vnc && - !vm.forward_vnc_port.nil? && - vm.forward_vnc_port != 0 } - - validates_uniqueness_of :forward_vnc_port, - :message => "is already in use&...

redux patchset permitting a vm to be associated with multiple networks and vice-versa. updated patchset so as to be applicable against current oVirt server HEAD these patches may be applied in any order, they all need to be pushed together

This patchset contains changes to the ovirt server frontend, backend, and tests components, permitting vms to be associated with multiple networks and vice versa. Also included are two patches which are required for the frontend bits; a patch adding collapsable sections to the vm form, which in itself depends on the second patch that provides default values for the cpu and memory vm table fields

...twork.nil? && nic.network.class == Vlan } + + # a vm / host can't have more than one nic on a network + validates_uniqueness_of :network_id, + :scope => [:host_id, :vm_id], + :unless => Proc.new { |nic| nic.network.nil? } validates_numericality_of :bandwidth, :greater_than_or_equal_to => 0 - validates_uniqueness_of :physical_network_id, - :scope => :host_id, - :unless => Proc.new { |nic| nic.physical_network_id.nil? } - # Returns whether the nic has networking defined. def networking? - (physical_network != nil) + (network != nil) end # Re...