search for: graue

Displaying 14 results from an estimated 14 matches for "graue".

Did you mean: grade
2007 Apr 15
2
While I'm Thinking About metaflac...
While I'm playing around with it, I'd like to ask about something I've noticed. Sometimes when I use metaflac to add tags, it performs it's operation instantly in a split second. Other times the same command causes lot of HDD I/O's and I can see it create a "filename.flac.metadata_edit" temp file. For example - I just added tags to a 25MB file and it took 15 seconds
2007 Apr 15
0
While I'm Thinking About metaflac...
Thanks Graue. That makes sense. Like I said - it's not causing a problem, I was just curious what it was doing. -Brad On 4/15/07, Graue <graue@oceanbase.org> wrote: > > "Brad Leblanc" <brad.leblanc@gmail.com> wrote: > > > While I'm playing around with it, I'd...
2007 Jul 25
1
FLAC 1.2.0 released
Pleas learn how to snip uneeded text from your posts. Version 1.2.0 is a stable release, which had some earlier beta revisions. I'd say it was quite well tested. Furthermore, there's no upgrade risk, as the API is still compatible. FLAC is backwards and forwards compatible. -Ivo
2007 Jul 25
1
Bug: flac --replay-gain thinks that I used --no-padding
Josh Coalson <xflac@yahoo.com> wrote: > --- Scott F <graue@oceanbase.org> wrote: > > > If I use flac to encode with the --replay-gain > > option, I get a warning about the --no-padding > > option... > > > > "NOTE: --replay-gain may leave a small PADDING block even with > > --no-padding" > > > &...
2005 Jun 14
2
Speex hardware support?
...t Speex? (I'm assuming not because they would probably be mentioned on the website if they did, but it can't hurt to ask.) If not, would making such devices be practical? If so, who should I write to and say that I want Speex support, or what else needs to be done? Thanks and nice work, -graue
2007 Jul 25
2
Bug: flac --replay-gain thinks that I used --no-padding
If I use flac to encode with the --replay-gain option, I get a warning about the --no-padding option... "NOTE: --replay-gain may leave a small PADDING block even with --no-padding" ...even though I'm not using --no-padding. And the file does end up with a small padding block, so changing tags is slow. I'd fixed this bug in my own copy of flac 1.1.4, but forgot to submit the
2005 Jun 14
0
Speex hardware support?
...ould probably be mentioned on the website if they did, but > it can't hurt to ask.) > > If not, would making such devices be practical? > > If so, who should I write to and say that I want Speex support, or what > else needs to be done? > > Thanks and nice work, > -graue > > _______________________________________________ > Speex-dev mailing list > Speex-dev@xiph.org > http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev -- Jean-Marc Valin <Jean-Marc.Valin@USherbrooke.ca> Universite de Sherbrooke
2006 Feb 23
1
On the fly enconding with verification?
Well it says: "With this option, Flac will create a parallel decoder that decodes the output of the encoder and compares the result against the original." My question still remains. With "on the fly encoding" it encodes as it rips. It does not create an intermediate WAV file and then converts. So if verification is indeed taking place, does it mean it verifies against the
2007 Feb 01
2
Problem decoding .flac files
On Thursday 01 February 2007 20:32, you wrote: > --- Hal Vaughan <hal@thresholddigital.com> wrote: > > amj.flac: 97% complete > > > > amj.flac: ERROR while decoding data > > state = FLAC__STREAM_DECODER_END_OF_STREAM > > > > The file plays without any problem from Amarok. How can flac > > encode this without any problem and have
2007 Feb 01
0
Problem decoding .flac files
...to be creating problems with the RIAA and their temperamental > people. You could upload it and send the link to Josh privately. Otherwise, if you upload it with no identification of what it is, like for instance calling it file_that_flac_wont_decode.flac, nobody will probably care. Regards, Graue
2007 May 23
1
1.1.4 FLAC's in 1.1.2
Quick question - if I use 1.1.4 to encode some files and send them to a friend who is using 1.1.2 - is it possible he won't be able to decode them? Having some trouble with this, wondering if the above could be related. Thanks, - Brad -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2007 Jun 10
0
Flac woes
...ram that has trouble with these 24-bit files, and no program besides FLAC that warns about them. Other wave file documentation I've seen -- for example, http://www.sonicspot.com/guide/ -- doesn't include that restriction. I guess this warning could be removed without harm. Regards, Scott / Graue
2005 Jun 14
1
Speex hardware support?
...ufacturer's. I transfer the audio in this format using USB. Do Rio, iRiver, and Apple make such things? I know they make mp3 (et al) players, but that's not what I'm talking about. Although I guess I wouldn't mind if the hypothetical Speex recorder had other capabilities. Thanks, -graue
2007 Jun 10
4
Flac woes
Howdy, Flac-1.1.4 is refusing to encode some WAV files (amd64, gentoo): % flac Song\ Name-Track01.wav Song Name-Track01.wav: WARNING: legacy WAVE file has format type 1 but bits-per-sample=24 Song Name-Track01.wav: 100% complete, ratio=0.546Song Name-Track01.wav: ERROR during read of data pad byte % sfinfo Song\ Name-Track01.wav File Name Song Name-Track01.wav File Format Microsoft RIFF