search for: gratuitiously

> What's the current status of the test suite. After putting everything > in the llvm namespace and getting everything to link, I am getting=20 > only about 75% of the tests passing. Is this to be expected or have > I broken something? I think that you broke something, specifically the C backend. See this comment for details: http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=109#c12

On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Corinna Vinschen <vinschen at redhat.com> wrote: [...] > Hmm. If that only affects Cygwin, and if defines.h is not synced anyway, > what about getting rid of the configure stuff entirely? > > Tested counterproposal: Looks reasonable. It's late here so I'm going to look at it tomorrow. > As for the comment preceeding the definition,

Hii All, I'm really a linux newbie, I managed to run into a problem with rsync. I want to conduct backups of various files and directories over about miles of Internet, so I chose ssh and rsync for the job. Earlier it used to work fine, but suddenly donno what happened it started to show the following errors sync: mkstemp

I am currently using shorewall on leaf-bering. I have set it up with keepalived to create a high availabilty firewall cluster. I have an odd question in regards to shorewall. Currently in production I have keepalived controlling shorewall starts and stops. If I remove this and leave shorewall running on the backup firewall, will I run into any problems with having the nat tables built out and

On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 12:05:53PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: [...] > This version doesn't build on Cygwin anymore. The reason is that > various configure tests fail. > > The culprit is the new definition of IPPORT_RESERVED to 0 in configure.ac. Sigh. How about putting it in defines.h instead? includes.h includes netinet/in.h from whence the definition of IPPORT_RESERVED

a friend of mine sent me the following and I'm thinking that there are people on this list that might be interested and could also hit the 10% improvement mark possibly ? i don't know any more about it than the article says so, if someone is interested, I guess you would have to contact netflix. a "thank you for telling me about it" gratuity on the prize money is of course

Hi All, I recently had an incident where a conf bridge was left open due to improper disconnection. I've read about the meetme options and marked callers closing the bridge when they exit. This is OK for meetme, but I'm really interested in a call timer that can be set on inbound and outbound calls within the dial plan, per call. I have another customer who wants to offer free calls,

> On Fri, 3 Aug 2007, JR Richardson wrote: > > > Can anyone point me int he right direction? > > At the risk of coming off in a gratuitiously self-aggrandising manner > quoting myself: > > http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2007-May/188438.html > > -- > Alex Balashov Thank you, Alex. As I've said many times, this community has the smartest people in the world. It is with great humbleness, I off...

Gimp on Centos 5 has somehow lost its ability to load a pdf file on three (i386) different computers. I'm pretty sure that this used to work. When I try to load a PDF file I get the initial box titled "Load Postscript" with rendering and antialiasing options, but when I hit OK I get an error message: Opening "filename" failed: Plug-In could not open image."

Okay, I'll fix that. But something *WILL* have to change, its not gratuitious. The "-c" option is in an enum which also has a "llvm" value which conflicts with the namespace name and caused a compilation error. To avoid the error, I changed "llvm" to "llvm_code". To be consistent, I changed the "c" enumeration to also have the same suffix,

Albert Graef wrote: > The broken mingw support (as pointed out by Stuart) [...] s/Stuart/Kenneth/ Sorry. -- Dr. Albert Gr"af Dept. of Music-Informatics, University of Mainz, Germany Email: Dr.Graef at t-online.de, ag at muwiinfa.geschichte.uni-mainz.de WWW: http://www.musikinformatik.uni-mainz.de/ag

On Sat, Apr 10, 2004 at 03:35:36AM +0400, "Valery A.Khamenya" wrote: > Hi Grzegorz, > > > Hard to say. What is "second breath"? Are you proposing a solution that > > integrates OpenC++ with LLVM? Please elaborate. > > let's separate "what" and "how". > > I do not speak abot "how" right now, because it is rather

Hi Grzegorz, > Hard to say. What is "second breath"? Are you proposing a solution that > integrates OpenC++ with LLVM? Please elaborate. let's separate "what" and "how". I do not speak abot "how" right now, because it is rather a second step (if any). I do believe that reflections without interpreter or JITing can't be any powerfull.

Óscar Fuentes wrote: > Some points you mention on your web page are solved. Which ones? (Just curious.) > Others are not applicable to LLVM. That might be the case now, but the lack of even basic functionality in some areas (in particular, no advanced feature checks, no make dist/distcheck, no make uninstall, lack of useful trace options when something goes wrong during a build, arcane

I sent this report sometime ago to l-k and to the preempt-patch maintainer, but omitted to send a copy here, where some people could have clues about the problem - so here it is: ----- Forwarded message ----- To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Robert Love <rml@tech9.net> Subject: oops with 2.4.18 and preempt patch, on SMP + ext3 machine Coming back home tonight, I found my machine in a bad

Vuoi Davvero Guadagnare con Internet? Bene, salva su disco questa pagina per averla a portata di mano anche se il tuo PC non ? connesso a Internet, poi copia quanto segue in Word o in Blocco Note e stampalo, cos? lo potrai leggere con pi? attenzione. Questo Sistema ? diverso da tutti gli altri, quindi non essere precipitoso nel valutarlo senza averlo compreso a fondo, ma ti assicuro che

In blkback driver, after I/O requests are submitted to Dom-0 block I/O subsystem, blkback goes to ''sleep'' effectively without letting blkfront know about it (req_event isn''t set appropriately). Hence blkfront doesn''t notify blkback when it submits a new I/O thus delaying the ''dispatch'' of the new I/O to Dom-0 block I/O subsystem. The new I/O is

The first release candidate of the 9.1-RELEASE release cycle is now available on the FTP servers for amd64, i386, and powerpc64. The MD5/SHA256 checksums are at the bottom of this message. The ISO images and, for architectures that support it, the memory stick images are available here: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/ISO-IMAGES/9.1/ (or any of the FreeBSD mirror sites). Current