search for: granville

...erence 2008) made a bit of a point by saying that LLVM, unlike GCC has been built from the ground up with tooling in mind. I appreciate that the tools that ship with LLVM use the foundation in place, however, I am curious as to whether there are any IDE projects that are building further upon this. Granville On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 7:47 PM, Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 6:04 AM, Granville > Barnett<granvillebarnett at googlemail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > I seem to remember that a big point of LLVM being built with tooling > suppo...

On Jun 16, 2009, at 1:05 PM, Granville Barnett wrote: > I'm more interested in whether or not there are any projects in the > works that fuse the tools together to build a better IDE experience. > I forget which presentation it was, but one of the developers (I > *think* it was the gentleman that presented somethin...

...t any tools which are actually taking advantage of the foundation LLVM provides. I'm not a Mac user, but I'd assume XCode would be a prime candidate - does/will XCode use LLVMs foundation to create a better IDE experience? Also, anyone know of similar efforts for Linux-based IDEs? Cheers, Granville -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090616/cd6f8b40/attachment.html>

...;t the run-time support etc. to write back ends for the C++ language, or that the compiler IR is also somehow insufficient to write a code generator? --Vikram Associate Professor, Computer Science University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign http://llvm.org/~vadve On Jul 11, 2009, at 3:00 PM, Granville Barnett wrote: > Hi, > > I've not got any experience using ANTLR to parse C++, however, you > will find that there only exists a C code generator for ANTLR and > NOT a C++ one. Over the years numerous people have requested a C++ > code generation template but alas there...

On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 6:04 AM, Granville Barnett<granvillebarnett at googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi, > I seem to remember that a big point of LLVM being built with tooling support > out of the box was a major thing, however, I've not read anything about any > tools which are actually taking advantage of the foundation L...

...ceforge.net/), and Coco/R (http://ssw.jku.at/coco/) rather than ANTLR as my parser generation tool when I needed something that worked well with C++. I take it though that the main reason you are thinking about using ANTLR is because of the availability of a pretty good, and existing C++ grammar? Granville PS. I strongly advise you to post this on the ANTLR mailing list ( http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest), things may have changed since I last looked. 2009/7/11 Vikram S. Adve <vadve at cs.uiuc.edu> > That sounds like a problem. Just so I understand, do you mean there...

Hi, I've not got any experience using ANTLR to parse C++, however, you will find that there only exists a C code generator for ANTLR and NOT a C++ one. Over the years numerous people have requested a C++ code generation template but alas there is still only a C one. Just a heads up. Granville 2009/7/11 Vikram S. Adve <vadve at cs.uiuc.edu> > We are looking for an open source C++ parser other than g++ if possible. > Clang would be great but its C++ support is still some way away and we need > something that works or nearly works now. Does anyone have any experience &g...

We are looking for an open source C++ parser other than g++ if possible. Clang would be great but its C++ support is still some way away and we need something that works or nearly works now. Does anyone have any experience with ANTLR for parsing C++ and for extending their C++ parser? Any other feedback on ANTLR in general would be welcome too. Thanks, --Vikram Associate Professor,

...> Dr Jon Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. > http://www.ffconsultancy.com/?e > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > -- Granville Barnett http://gbarnett.github.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090618/155b0703/attachment.html>

Are there any papers in the works which benchmark some specification suite of C programs on GCC, LLVM-GCC, and CLANG? The only stuff I have seen so far are some bar charts in a few LLVM presentations, would be nice to have something a little more comprehensive. Cheers, Granville On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 6:51 AM, Jon Harrop <jon at ffconsultancy.com> wrote: > On Tuesday 16 June 2009 00:43:58 David Greene wrote: > > But hey, we use LLVM to do it! > > Hello David, > > I just noticed your post and was wondering what Cray are doing with LLVM? > Ar...

On Thursday 18 June 2009 12:28:57 Cory Nelson wrote: > I'm also curious what language uses this and why it is useful :) HLVM is intended to be a general-purpose VM rather than a particular language. > Also, things like this would make lock-free algorithms difficult or > impossible. True. Perhaps that is a good argument for providing both kinds. However, nulls are certainly more

...relevant pointers to the objects' type among other things. It simply means you do a few hops, each of which is a constant operation anyway. Maybe I'm missing something key about the language you are implementing the GC for, also is it really necessary to use an extra word for null types? Granville 2009/6/18 Jon Harrop <jon at ffconsultancy.com> > On Tuesday 16 June 2009 07:37:32 Talin wrote: > > A while back there was a discussion thread about whether an accurate, > > concurrent garbage collector could be "generic" in the sense of being > > able to supp...

...ted in performance, it's best to measure it on the applications you're interested in. You should be suspicious of any one-dimensional analysis of compiler optimization, especially if it's presented by someone with an interest in a particular compiler. Dan On Jun 16, 2009, at 5:59 AM, Granville Barnett wrote: > Are there any papers in the works which benchmark some specification > suite of C programs on GCC, LLVM-GCC, and CLANG? > > The only stuff I have seen so far are some bar charts in a few LLVM > presentations, would be nice to have something a little more >...

On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 3:14 AM, Granville Barnett<granvillebarnett at googlemail.com> wrote: > >> Firstly, rather than using a single 1 word pointer to represent a >> reference I >> chose to use 3 words including a pointer to the type and a pointer to the >> value (as well as metadata). This allows typed nu...

I thought I could create a wiki page if I just entered a new entry in the TOC while I''m logged in. This isn''t working how I would expect it to...what steps need to be taken to get a page started? Mike B. ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

...[2003/01/14 09:18:46, 1] libsmb/cliconnect.c:cli_full_connection(1218) session request to 10.23.1.11 failed (Called name not present) Enumerating domains: Domain name Server name of Browse Master ------------- ---------------------------- STLO-ADMIN GRANVILLE STLO-SMB HONFLEUR Global section of my smb.conf is: [global] netbios name = honfleur workgroup = STLO-SMB domain logons = yes security = user os level = 34 local master = yes preferred master = yes domain master = ye...

...003/01/14 09:18:46, 1] libsmb/cliconnect.c:cli_full_connection(1218) session request to 192.168.25.25 failed (Called name not present) Enumerating domains: Domain name Server name of Browse Master ------------- ---------------------------- STLO-ADMIN GRANVILLE STLO-SMB HONFLEUR In this case, I can see my 2 domains. Global section of my smb.conf is: [global] netbios name = honfleur workgroup = STLO-SMB domain logons = yes security = user os level = 34 local master = yes preferred...

Hi, I had a working puppet setup using version 0.22 until the ruby security patch bit me. I tried upgrading server and clients to 0.24.1 however my old manifests don''t seem to work anymore. When I run puppetd on the client I see lots of messages like: err: //Node[waterbuck]/yumupdater/Remotefile[/etc/cron.hourly/yumupdater]/File[/etc/cron.hourly/yumupdater]/ensure: change from absent

On Tuesday 16 June 2009 00:43:58 David Greene wrote: > But hey, we use LLVM to do it! Hello David, I just noticed your post and was wondering what Cray are doing with LLVM? Are you using it in production? I am trying to keep an eye on the fast moving LLVM project and like to keep up to date with respect to its industrial applications... -- Dr Jon Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd.

On Tuesday 16 June 2009 07:37:32 Talin wrote: > A while back there was a discussion thread about whether an accurate, > concurrent garbage collector could be "generic" in the sense of being > able to support multiple different languages efficiently. After having > done some work on this, I now believe that this is the case - using C++ > policy-based design principles, you