Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "graned".
Did you mean:
granted
2000 Jul 06
1
PAM on OPenBSD for OpenSSH?
I know this is slightly off-topic.
I'm looking at a way to use PAM with OpenSSH, on OpenBSD 2.7 (which
at the moment as far as I can tell has no PAM support).
I wonder how hard it would be to spoof the config of the portable
OpenSSH into thinking it was on something that supported PAM, and
then having a wrapper of some sort to connect to a PAM module?
Some background: I have a requirement
2003 Jun 22
1
0.99.10-rc1
...out locking.. If we want to share indexes
between many clients, lock contention will become a problem. For example
a "FETCH 1:* BODY[]" could take a long time and index can't be modified
while it's being done. I'm not really sure what to do about this..
Probably some more fine graned locking and maybe some kind of
transaction log where changes are written if you couldn't get exclusive
lock.
2013 Mar 15
4
[PATCHv3 vringh] caif_virtio: Introduce caif over virtio
...gen_pool_free(cfv->genpool, cfv->reserved_mem,
+ cfv->reserved_size);
+ gen_pool_destroy(cfv->genpool);
+ cfv->genpool = NULL;
+}
+
+static int cfv_create_genpool(struct cfv_info *cfv)
+{
+ int err;
+
+ /* dma_alloc can only allocate whole pages, and we need a more
+ * fine graned allocation so we use genpool. We ask for space needed
+ * by IP and a full ring. If the dma allcoation fails we retry with a
+ * smaller allocation size.
+ */
+ err = -ENOMEM;
+ cfv->allocsz = (virtqueue_get_vring_size(cfv->vq_tx) *
+ (ETH_DATA_LEN + cfv->tx_hr + cfv->tx_tr) * 11)/...
2013 Mar 15
4
[PATCHv3 vringh] caif_virtio: Introduce caif over virtio
...gen_pool_free(cfv->genpool, cfv->reserved_mem,
+ cfv->reserved_size);
+ gen_pool_destroy(cfv->genpool);
+ cfv->genpool = NULL;
+}
+
+static int cfv_create_genpool(struct cfv_info *cfv)
+{
+ int err;
+
+ /* dma_alloc can only allocate whole pages, and we need a more
+ * fine graned allocation so we use genpool. We ask for space needed
+ * by IP and a full ring. If the dma allcoation fails we retry with a
+ * smaller allocation size.
+ */
+ err = -ENOMEM;
+ cfv->allocsz = (virtqueue_get_vring_size(cfv->vq_tx) *
+ (ETH_DATA_LEN + cfv->tx_hr + cfv->tx_tr) * 11)/...