search for: grandparents

hi, i have this in my code Article.find_by_contents("#{searchstring} +city:#{passedincity}") well that returns to me only articles that belong to whatever the user selected in city. now is it possible to search the grandparent? for example class country has_many states class states has_many cities belongs_to country class city belongs_to states ...... i would like to search

...e user directories with the appropriate owners, and to do so, it requires root rights. I am trying to investigate getting rid of this need?. Since Dovecot quite happily creates ~/Maildir when necessary, couldn't it also create parents? The home directory should be trivial (same EUID/EGID), but grandparents etc. might need a different policy (e.g. 0/EGID for the grandparent, 0/0 for great-grandparents, etc.). Is this something that could fall within the realm of Dovecot's lmtp? Or is the lmtp invoked as the user and doesn't actually drop root? If so, might there be another way? ?) http://vmm...

Hello! I note the following in the serial console: if (is_rproc_serial(vdev)) { /* * Allocate DMA memory from ancestor. When a virtio * device is created by remoteproc, the DMA memory is * associated with the grandparent device: * vdev => rproc => platform-dev. */ if

Hello! I note the following in the serial console: if (is_rproc_serial(vdev)) { /* * Allocate DMA memory from ancestor. When a virtio * device is created by remoteproc, the DMA memory is * associated with the grandparent device: * vdev => rproc => platform-dev. */ if

I have a register hierarchy that looks like a binary tree. v4 -> {v2, v2} -> {s, s}{s, s}(or, {x, y}, {z, w}) I have an instruction that can access the 2nd and/or 4th scalar and an instruction that can access the 1st and/or 3rd scalar. What I need to do is that given the first scalar, I need to be able to select the 2nd scalar, or/and given the 3rd, select the 4th. I define a sibling

Given a function that calls itself, what's the best way to detect the entry point? The best I came up with is: IsEntryPoint <- function(){ par <- sys.call(-1L)[[1]] grandpar <- sys.call(-2L)[[1]] !identical(par, grandpar) } but this won't work for functions that don't directly call themselves; for example, in this one the paste gets inserted in the

> -----Original Message----- > From: linux-remoteproc-owner at vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-remoteproc- > owner at vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Anup Patel > Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2018 6:08 AM > To: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> > Cc: linux-remoteproc at vger.kernel.org; Ohad Ben-Cohen > <ohad at wizery.com>; Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson at

> -----Original Message----- > From: linux-remoteproc-owner at vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-remoteproc- > owner at vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Anup Patel > Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2018 6:08 AM > To: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> > Cc: linux-remoteproc at vger.kernel.org; Ohad Ben-Cohen > <ohad at wizery.com>; Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson at

Hi Micah, This sounds somewhat similar to what ARM uses for the stride-by-two vector load instructions. For example, Tuples2DSpc. While not exactly what you're looking for, perhaps something along those lines would work? -Jim On Jul 17, 2012, at 3:24 PM, "Villmow, Micah" <Micah.Villmow at amd.com> wrote: > I have a register hierarchy that looks like a binary tree. >

I''m sure this is really obvious but I''m feeling my way here with rails (and Ruby) and have tried a couple of things without success. So, can anyone tell me the best way to reverse order the retuen list of ancestors. In the controller I have: @ancestors = @category.ancestors which returns an array starting at the parent and ending with the root. When I then loop through the

Hello, We have installed a brand new Dovecot because it seems very interesting as an IMAP server. We created a mailbox for a test user and we succeeded in copying some mails into it. However making subfolders does not work. The only folders we can create are in the root, next to the INBOX that is. We thought Maildir does support subfolders (as opposed to mbox), are we wrong here? Our Dovecot

One of the things that have been annoying me with both Splus and R is that the "simple tests" are inconsistent with the lm/glm/dataframe conventions, and that they become quite awkward to use when data have to be extracted from a dataframe: t.test(data$bp[data$sex=="F" & data$age>25], data$bp[data$sex=="M" & data$age>25]) OK, so it's better to do

> -----Original Message----- > From: Michael S. Tsirkin [mailto:mst at redhat.com] > Sent: Monday, April 23, 2018 9:41 PM > To: Loic PALLARDY <loic.pallardy at st.com> > Cc: Anup Patel <anup at brainfault.org>; linux-remoteproc at vger.kernel.org; > Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad at wizery.com>; Bjorn Andersson > <bjorn.andersson at linaro.org>; virtualization at

Nipun Arora wrote: > Hi, > > How can one extract the operand of an instruction in an LLVM pass? > Like I can get the opcode bt I'd like to get the operands as well > Use the getOperand() method of class Instruction (which I think is inherited from Value or User or some other LLVM class). It takes a single parameter that is an index specifying which operand to return. The

On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 10:23 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > Hello! > I note the following in the serial console: > > if (is_rproc_serial(vdev)) { > /* > * Allocate DMA memory from ancestor. When a virtio > * device is created by remoteproc, the DMA memory is > * associated

Hello Not sure how I'm meant to go about requesting a Maintainer, but I'll try this method. I am trying to get my grandparents to switch from Windows XP to Linux (Ubuntu). First step, would of course be including all programs they currently have on there computer. So I need Legacy Family Tree 7. Any chance of a maintainer? Thanks in advance, Panarchy

Hi, How can one extract the operand of an instruction in an LLVM pass? Like I can get the opcode bt I'd like to get the operands as well Thanks Nipun -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090211/3a073512/attachment.html>

On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 08:55:57AM +0000, Loic PALLARDY wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: linux-remoteproc-owner at vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-remoteproc- > > owner at vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Anup Patel > > Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2018 6:08 AM > > To: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> > > Cc: linux-remoteproc at

Hello everyone, I'm a student at the Universtiy of Delaware, and will be soon starting some research on the effects of lossy audio compression on speech sounds. I will be preforming test with both mp3 and vorbis. First of all, if I use the '--ogg' switch to lame, does lame use GPSYCHO to encode the wave, or some other psychoacoustic model (perhaps one designed for

Hi Hal, > My rationale for proposing the self-consistent metadata solution was > that it seemed to be the safest option. If we simply insist that all > relevant passes use the ParallizationMetadata pass, without any > verification, then we could end up with parallelization-unaware passes > silently miscompiling code when parallelization is enabled. Do you have > a way of