search for: gramamr

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "gramamr".

2016 Sep 01
2
RFC: FileCheck Enhancements
...hancements > At first I thought that `register(n)` was some sort of macro, but if it is suppose to be equivalent to the example above of what we do “today”, then using “register(“1”)” is supposed to “capture” the ‘r’ part of the register on the first match. This is a problem with my suggested gramamr (specifically: it doesn't provide a way to use defined patterns to capture text for later reference). Fred brought up that he was confused by this too. One way to fix it is to use '@' before using patterns. I'll recap the suggested grammar and work through another example. Here...
2016 Sep 01
2
RFC: FileCheck Enhancements
...hancements > At first I thought that `register(n)` was some sort of macro, but if it is suppose to be equivalent to the example above of what we do “today”, then using “register(“1”)” is supposed to “capture” the ‘r’ part of the register on the first match. This is a problem with my suggested gramamr (specifically: it doesn't provide a way to use defined patterns to capture text for later reference). Fred brought up that he was confused by this too. One way to fix it is to use '@' before using patterns. I'll recap the suggested grammar and work through another example. Here...
2016 Sep 05
2
RFC: FileCheck Enhancements
...; At first I thought that `register(n)` was some sort of macro, but if it is suppose to be equivalent to the example above of what we do “today”, then using “register(“1”)” is supposed to “capture” the ‘r’ part of the register on the first match. > > > This is a problem with my suggested gramamr (specifically: it doesn't provide a way to use defined patterns to capture text for later reference). Fred brought up that he was confused by this too. > > One way to fix it is to use '@' before using patterns. I'll recap the suggested grammar and work through another exampl...
2016 Aug 31
6
RFC: FileCheck Enhancements
> On Aug 24, 2016, at 4:46 PM, Vedant Kumar via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> >> On Aug 24, 2016, at 2:04 AM, Elena Lepilkina <Elena.Lepilkina at synopsys.com> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> Some discussions and comments were made in reviews. Much time has already passed since last comment and uploading changed patches. I