search for: grains

Can you explain why you need them as 'integer', A floating point representation can hold a value upto ~4.5e15 as an "integer" keeping the precision that you might need. Jim Holtman Data Munger Guru What is the problem that you are trying to solve? Tell me what you want to do, not how you want to do it. On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 1:11 PM, Andr? Luis Neves <andrluis at

Hello all, A quick question concerning a behavior of reshape I fail tu understand, probably something obvious but I just can't see it. With the following data frame further referred to as tab :

Ok. I`m trying to run a Poisson glmm with an observation-level random intercept. But I`m getting the following error for the 'Baci' variable: 'Error: (maxstephalfit) PIRLS step-halvings failed to reduce deviance in pwrssUpdate'. I guess this message is because the baci variable is not a an integer, and cannot be transformed into an integer as R has a threshold of 2x10^9 even in

Dear all: I converted the columns (Baci, Meti, Fungii, Protozoai) into integers (using excel) and then imported the data (.txt) into R. Interestingly, the other three variables were loaded as INT, but the 'Baci' one continued as Num. I imported the data using the following command line: X <- read.delim(file.choose(), header = TRUE, dec =

Dear useRs I have uploaded a new package, gRain, for propability propagation in graphical independence networks; sometimes also called probabilistic expertsystems and Bayesian networks. Regards S?ren H?jsgaard _______________________________________________ R-packages mailing list R-packages at r-project.org https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-packages

Dear useRs I have uploaded a new package, gRain, for propability propagation in graphical independence networks; sometimes also called probabilistic expertsystems and Bayesian networks. Regards S?ren H?jsgaard _______________________________________________ R-packages mailing list R-packages at r-project.org https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-packages

Hi, In following link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?reload=9&v=6X12D46sRFw They have specified that the inliner can't use DomTree/LoopInfo/MemorySSA analysis. 1. What's the reason for this? 2. Why can't we do it using getAnalysisUsage() construct? 3. Can inline use this information in the new Pass Manager? 4. What all information can we derive from DomTree to be of help to

Hi. Dovecot 2.2, with the zlib plugin, I think we're getting bad index entries on IMAP COPY. On copying a message to an empty folder, in the dovecot error log I see: Sep 19 20:34:25 imap01 dovecot: imap(grain at rp-auth-test.com): Error: Cached message size smaller than expected (615 < 971) Sep 19 20:34:25 imap01 dovecot: imap(grain at rp-auth-test.com): Error: Corrupted index cache file

On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 10:22:14AM +0200, Karol Herbst wrote: > On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 6:06 AM Ben Skeggs <skeggsb at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, 13 Aug 2020 at 06:50, Jeremy Cline <jcline at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > Commit d32656373857 ("drm/nouveau/therm/gp100: initial implementation of > > > new gp1xx temperature

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1180 Summary: Add finer-grained controls to sshd Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org ReportedBy: dtucker at

On Thu, 13 Aug 2020 at 06:50, Jeremy Cline <jcline at redhat.com> wrote: > > Commit d32656373857 ("drm/nouveau/therm/gp100: initial implementation of > new gp1xx temperature sensor") added support for reading finer-grain > temperatures, but continued to report temperatures in 1 degree Celsius > increments via nvkm_therm_temp_get(). > > Rather than altering

I ran our test suite with grain of 8 and 32, and more tests were able to avoid running out of memory with grain of 32 than 8. The ones that run out of memory on 8 but not 32 all failed trying to allocate a large region from the heap (350M). I haven't had any tests that run out of memory for other reasons. Given that, I will check in the current selected granularity of 32. I will try grain

On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 6:06 AM Ben Skeggs <skeggsb at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, 13 Aug 2020 at 06:50, Jeremy Cline <jcline at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > Commit d32656373857 ("drm/nouveau/therm/gp100: initial implementation of > > new gp1xx temperature sensor") added support for reading finer-grain > > temperatures, but continued to report

Hello, I found some code within the pool allocation project to identify parallelizable function calls. Unfortunately the functionality isn't part of the current release of poolalloc (in release 14 it was). My intention is to estimate the parallelization-potential of sequential applications concerning coarse-grained parallelism. Can you tell me... 1. Why are classes of pollalloc, like

Hi, I'm not sure how interested anybody here is in this, but I've been working lately on getting rid of the horror that is SunSSH for some distros of Illumos (mostly SmartOS). One of the patches we're carrying around at the moment is one that simply drops fine-grained privileges in sshd, ssh-agent and sftp-server. Since the privilege dropping here is roughly equivalent to a more

On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 12:52:55PM -0700, Chris Lattner wrote: > I think the problem here is that these lead to natural and inescapable > tensions, and Alex summarized how Camp B has been steering LLD away > from what Camp A people want. This isn’t bad in and of itself, because > what Camp B wants is clearly and unarguably good for LLVM. However, > it is also not sufficient, and

Hi I try to implement a coarse-grained CFI in LLVM (CFI = Contorl Flow Integrity) I want to collect all address after call instructions address after a call equals to a valid return site in coarse-grained CFI I want to add a new section and write all the possible return address in the new section (and then, add the integrity check) I have some quetions: (1) Which part of LLVM code should

Am 22.04.2011 um 18:03 schrieb Tobias Grosser: > On 04/20/2011 08:05 AM, Andreas Wilhelm wrote: >> Am 19.04.2011 um 16:44 schrieb John Criswell: >> >>> On 4/19/11 5:57 AM, Andreas Wilhelm wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I found some code within the pool allocation project to identify >>>> parallelizable function calls.

On 4/19/11 5:57 AM, Andreas Wilhelm wrote: > Hello, > > I found some code within the pool allocation project to identify > parallelizable function calls. > Unfortunately the functionality isn't part of the current release of > poolalloc (in release 14 it was). Can you tell me in what file(s) this is implemented? I wasn't aware that the poolalloc project had such an

On May 4, 2015, at 1:16 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg at britannica.bec.de> wrote: > It has been said in this thread before, but I fail to see how the atom > model is an actual improvement over the fine grained section model. It > seems to be artifically restricted for no good reasons. Sections come with a huge amount of bloat and overhead that atoms do not. >> Lets stop