Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "grafikr".
Did you mean:
grafik
2012 Mar 08
3
"figure margins too large" in RGtk2 drawing area as cairo device - why?
...er the error: "figure margins too large"
Even for the below "getting started" example from http://www.ggobi.org/rgtk2/ this is the case.
> win = gtkWindow()
> da = gtkDrawingArea()
> win$add(da)
> asCairoDevice(da)
[1] TRUE
> plot(1:10)
Fehler in plot.new() : Grafikr?nder zu gro?
>
Also enlarging the drawing area does not help.
> win = gtkWindow()
> da = gtkDrawingArea()
> win$add(da)
> asCairoDevice(da)
[1] TRUE
> da$setSizeRequest(700, 700)
> plot(1:10)
Fehler in plot.new() : Grafikr?nder zu gro?
Any ideas?
Thanks in advance.
--Mar...
2007 Sep 19
3
layout function for several plots
Dear all
I try to print 9 plots on a page, arranged as the code shows below.
nf <- layout(matrix(c(1,0,2,0,0,3,0,4,0,5,0,6,0,0,0,0,7,0,8,9), 10,2))
layout.show(nf)
but when I try to plot, an error message
Fehler in plot.new() : Grafikr?nder zu gro?
appears
to verify p.e. with
plot(runif(10:1))
i tried with plot(runif(10:1), ann=F) to produce more space, but neither.
The second question: how to place a cross in the middle of the plot to delineate in 4 big fields (containing each 5 plots)
Thanks a lot
--
_________________...
2006 Dec 22
0
plot.mids / Error in plot.new() : figure margins too large
.../Manual.pdf
> page 17, if there are many variables (~80) with NAs included?
> mice runs well, but the plot is not possible because it seems that there
> are too many variables.
>
> > imp.temp <- mice(data.withnas, m=5)
> > plot(imp.temp)
> Fehler in plot.new() : Grafikr?nder zu gro?
> = error in plot.new(): boundaries of graphics too big/huge
>
> Is it possible to run the plot() sequentially, so that only a selected
> part of the variables are plotted?
> Of course I can run mice() on a reduced dataset, but then the
> estimations are differe...
2007 Sep 19
1
lmer using quasibinomial family
Dear all, I try to consider overdispersion in a lmer model. But using
family=quasibinomial rather than family=binomial seems to change the fit but
not the result of an anova test. In addition if we specify test="F" as it is
recomanded for glm using quasibinomial, the test remains a Chisq test. Are
all tests scaled for dispersion, or none? Why is there a difference between
glm and lmer