search for: graduateinstitut

How about going back to earlier versions if you don't need the latest ones? On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 12:59 PM, Klaus Michael Keller < klaus.keller at graduateinstitute.ch> wrote: > Dear all, > > I just installed the "Short Summer" R update last week. Now, my R Studio > doesn't open anymore! > > --> <p>R encountered a fatal error. </p> The session was terminated. > > and my R terminal doesn't close prop...

...than a problem with R itself. Dave On 26 October 2017 at 12:11, Eric Berger <ericjberger at gmail.com> wrote: > How about going back to earlier versions if you don't need the latest ones? > > > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 12:59 PM, Klaus Michael Keller < > klaus.keller at graduateinstitute.ch> wrote: > > > Dear all, > > > > I just installed the "Short Summer" R update last week. Now, my R Studio > > doesn't open anymore! > > > > --> <p>R encountered a fatal error. </p> The session was terminated. > > > &...

Dear all, I just installed the "Short Summer" R update last week. Now, my R Studio doesn't open anymore! --> <p>R encountered a fatal error. </p> The session was terminated. and my R terminal doesn't close properly --> *** caught illegal operation *** I restarted my Mac OS Sierra 10.12.6 and reinstalled both R 3.4.2 and the latest R studio but the problem

...gt; > On 26 October 2017 at 12:11, Eric Berger <ericjberger at gmail.com> wrote: > >> How about going back to earlier versions if you don't need the latest ones? >> >> >> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 12:59 PM, Klaus Michael Keller < >> klaus.keller at graduateinstitute.ch> wrote: >> >>> Dear all, >>> >>> I just installed the "Short Summer" R update last week. Now, my R Studio >>> doesn't open anymore! >>> >>> --> <p>R encountered a fatal error. </p> The session was ter...

Dear Developers, Having spent time developing and thinking about how data aggregation and summary statistics can be enhanced in R, I would like to present my ideas/efforts in the form of two commands: The first, which for now I called 'collap', is an upgrade of aggregate that accommodates and extends the functionality of aggregate in various respects, most importantly to work with

...R and C should be pretty straightforward. > It would just require a modification to R CMD Check to recognize .[<- as > assignment. > > Best regards, > > Sebastian > - > 2.) > > On Sun, 12 Mar 2023 at 09:42, Sebastian Martin Krantz > <sebastian.krantz at graduateinstitute.ch > <mailto:sebastian.krantz at graduateinstitute.ch>> wrote: > > Thanks Gabriel and Kevin for your inputs, > > regarding your points Gabriel, I think Python and Julia do allow > multiple sub-assignment, but in-line with my earlier suggestion in >...

...gt; It would just require a modification to R CMD Check to recognize .[<- as > > assignment. > > > > Best regards, > > > > Sebastian > > - > > 2.) > > > > On Sun, 12 Mar 2023 at 09:42, Sebastian Martin Krantz > > <sebastian.krantz at graduateinstitute.ch > > <mailto:sebastian.krantz at graduateinstitute.ch>> wrote: > > > > Thanks Gabriel and Kevin for your inputs, > > > > regarding your points Gabriel, I think Python and Julia do allow > > multiple sub-assignment, but in-line with my earl...

...bles for specific data sets, but this would reduce that effort to simply using the right collap() call. Like Inaki, I'm very interested in trying it out if you have the code available somewhere. Cheers Joris On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 9:01 AM Sebastian Martin Krantz < sebastian.krantz at graduateinstitute.ch> wrote: > Dear Developers, > > Having spent time developing and thinking about how data aggregation and > summary statistics can be enhanced in R, I would like to present my > ideas/efforts in the form of two commands: > > The first, which for now I called 'collap...

...full list of results, because that introduces the ambiguity this is trying to avoid right back in. Perhaps just the first thing returned? That is internally consistent, but somewhat strange behavior... Best, ~G On Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 2:15?PM Sebastian Martin Krantz < sebastian.krantz at graduateinstitute.ch> wrote: > Thanks Duncan and Ivan for the careful thoughts. I'm not sure I can follow > all aspects you raised, but to give my limited take on a few: > > > your proposal violates a very basic property of the language, i.e. that > all statements are expressions and have...

...> > > .[<- as > > > assignment. > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > Sebastian > > > - > > > 2.) > > > > > > On Sun, 12 Mar 2023 at 09:42, Sebastian Martin Krantz > > > <sebastian.krantz at graduateinstitute.ch > > > <mailto:sebastian.krantz at graduateinstitute.ch>> wrote: > > > > > > ??? Thanks Gabriel and Kevin for your inputs, > > > > > > ??? regarding your points Gabriel, I think Python and Julia do > > > allow > > > ??? mu...

...[<- as >>>> assignment. >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> >>>> Sebastian >>>> - >>>> 2.) >>>> >>>> On Sun, 12 Mar 2023 at 09:42, Sebastian Martin Krantz >>>> <sebastian.krantz at graduateinstitute.ch >>>> <mailto:sebastian.krantz at graduateinstitute.ch>> wrote: >>>> >>>> ??? Thanks Gabriel and Kevin for your inputs, >>>> >>>> ??? regarding your points Gabriel, I think Python and Julia do >>>> allow >>&...

Thanks Gabriel and Kevin for your inputs, regarding your points Gabriel, I think Python and Julia do allow multiple sub-assignment, but in-line with my earlier suggestion in response to Duncan to make multiple assignment an environment-level operation (like collapse::%=% currently works), this would not be possible in R. Regarding the [a] <- coolest_function() syntax, yeah it would mean do

Dear R Core, working on my dynamic factor modelling package, which requires several subroutines to create and update several system matrices, I come back to the issue of being annoyed by R not supporting multiple assignment out of the box like Matlab, Python and julia. e.g. something like A, C, Q, R = init_matrices(X, Y, Z) would be a great addition to the language. I know there are several

Thanks Duncan and Ivan for the careful thoughts. I'm not sure I can follow all aspects you raised, but to give my limited take on a few: > your proposal violates a very basic property of the language, i.e. that all statements are expressions and have a value. > What's the value of 1 + (A, C = init_matrices()). I'm not sure I see the point here. I evaluated 1 + (d =