search for: gqivpva7brio

On Sun, 2020-10-18 at 19:59 +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 09:09:28AM -0700, trix at redhat.com wrote: > > clang has a number of useful, new warnings see > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://clang.llvm.org/docs/DiagnosticsReference.html__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!Krxz78O3RKcB9JBMVo_F98FupVhj_jxX60ddN6tKGEbv_cnooXc1nnBmchm-e_O9ieGnyQ$ > > Please get your IT department to remove that stupidity. If you > can't, please send email from a non-Red Hat email address. Actually, the problem is at Oracle's end somewhere in the ocfs2 list ... if yo...

On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 09:09:28AM -0700, trix at redhat.com wrote: > clang has a number of useful, new warnings see > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://clang.llvm.org/docs/DiagnosticsReference.html__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!Krxz78O3RKcB9JBMVo_F98FupVhj_jxX60ddN6tKGEbv_cnooXc1nnBmchm-e_O9ieGnyQ$ Please get your IT department to remove that stupidity. If you can't, please send email from a non-Red Hat email address. I don't understand why this is a useful warning to fix. What actual problem is caused by the...

...; On Sun, 2020-10-18 at 19:59 +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 09:09:28AM -0700, trix at redhat.com wrote: > > > clang has a number of useful, new warnings see > > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://clang.llvm.org/docs/DiagnosticsReference.html__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!Krxz78O3RKcB9JBMVo_F98FupVhj_jxX60ddN6tKGEbv_cnooXc1nnBmchm-e_O9ieGnyQ$ > > > > Please get your IT department to remove that stupidity. If you > > can't, please send email from a non-Red Hat email address. > > Actually, the problem is at Oracle's end somewhere in...

...treewide. I am wondering if the change could be one mega patch (see below) or normal patch per file about 100 patches or somewhere half way by collecting early acks. clang has a number of useful, new warnings see https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://clang.llvm.org/docs/DiagnosticsReference.html__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!Krxz78O3RKcB9JBMVo_F98FupVhj_jxX60ddN6tKGEbv_cnooXc1nnBmchm-e_O9ieGnyQ$ This change cleans up -Wunreachable-code-break https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://clang.llvm.org/docs/DiagnosticsReference.html*wunreachable-code-break__;Iw!!GqivPVa7Brio!Krxz78O3RKcB9JBMVo_F98FupVhj_jxX60ddN6tKGEbv_cnooXc1n...

...treewide. I am wondering if the change could be one mega patch (see below) or normal patch per file about 100 patches or somewhere half way by collecting early acks. clang has a number of useful, new warnings see https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://clang.llvm.org/docs/DiagnosticsReference.html__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!Krxz78O3RKcB9JBMVo_F98FupVhj_jxX60ddN6tKGEbv_cnooXc1nnBmchm-e_O9ieGnyQ$ This change cleans up -Wunreachable-code-break https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://clang.llvm.org/docs/DiagnosticsReference.html*wunreachable-code-break__;Iw!!GqivPVa7Brio!Krxz78O3RKcB9JBMVo_F98FupVhj_jxX60ddN6tKGEbv_cnooXc1n...

On Sat, 17 Oct 2020, Joe Perches wrote: > On Sat, 2020-10-17 at 09:09 -0700, trix at redhat.com wrote: > > From: Tom Rix <trix at redhat.com> > > > > This is a upcoming change to clean up a new warning treewide. > > I am wondering if the change could be one mega patch (see below) or > > normal patch per file about 100 patches or somewhere half way by

On Sat, 17 Oct 2020, Joe Perches wrote: > On Sat, 2020-10-17 at 09:09 -0700, trix at redhat.com wrote: > > From: Tom Rix <trix at redhat.com> > > > > This is a upcoming change to clean up a new warning treewide. > > I am wondering if the change could be one mega patch (see below) or > > normal patch per file about 100 patches or somewhere half way by