search for: gpp

...duction is either nitrogen (TIN) or Phosphorus limited, and I am trying to investigate this- what is the best way to go about investigating the interaction term. I have some thoughts on the above, but I will withhold them to see what others think. Thanks for your help. d <- (structure(list(d.GPP = c(1.213695235, 3.817313822, 1.267930498, 10.45692825, 3.268295623, 3.505286001, 4.468225245, 0.915653726, 1.635617261, 3.726133898, 1.363453706, 13.99650967, 0.417618143, 0.741080504, 0.412440872, 3.515743675, 8.248491445, 1.537773727, 1.537773727, 3.249103284, 3.249103284, 0.768531626, 2.6331076...

...onnected with psi value, and the error says: Error in seg.glm.fit(y, XREG, Z, PSI, weights, offs, opz) : (Some) estimated psi out of its range This is the code I am using: library("segmented") curva<-read.table("lamintr1.txt", header=T) attach(curva) fit.glm<-glm(gpp~temp, weight=NULL, family=gaussian) plot(temp,gpp,xlab=expression("temp"), ylab="gpp",pch=15,cex=0.8,xlim=c(0,50), ylim=c(0,40)) o1<-glm(gpp ~ temp, weight=NULL, family=gaussian) os1<-segmented(o1, seg.Z=~temp, psi=15, control=seg.control(n.boot=0, display=T, it.max=5)) p...

r <-(structure(list(TSS = c(2.8, 8.4, 11, 1.3, 4.2, 2, 3.4, 14, 8.2, 3.1, 1.4, 0.9, 0.5, 6.1, 9.2, 0.6, 1, 11, 2.4, 1.2, 1.3, 1.3, 0, 1.8, 8, 11, 11, 8.5, 8.5, 1.8, 13, 4.4, 1.4, 2.1, 0.5, 25, 25, 9.3, 6.1, 1.6, 1.5, 19, 19, 24, 9.6, 1.8, 1.4, 1), GPP = c(1.213695235, 3.817313822, 1.267930498, 10.45692825, 3.268295623, 3.505286001, 4.468225245, 0.915653726, 1.635617261, 3.726133898, 1.363453706, 13.99650967, 1.581182762, 0.417618143, 0.741080504, 1.366790205, 0.969326797, 0.412440872, 1.780215366, 3.515743675, 8.248491445, 0.125726306, 13.958807...

...hese particular graphs) argument, but it fits the subsets instead of the entire data set-- should I use a list of regression fits in the order of the arguments in an abline panel to do this? Ok, I think that is all for right now. If I need to clarify please tell me. thanks f <- structure(list(GPP = c(1.213695235, 3.817313822, 1.267930498, 10.45692825, 3.268295623, 3.505286001, 4.468225245, 0.915653726, 1.635617261, 3.726133898, 1.363453706, 13.99650967, 0.417618143, 0.741080504, 0.412440872, 3.515743675, 8.248491445, 1.537773727, 3.249103284, 0.768531626, 2.633107621, 3.113199095, 0.7738240...

..., but here is a quick and dirty version. thanks r <-(structure(list(TSS = c(2.8, 8.4, 11, 1.3, 4.2, 2, 3.4, 14, 8.2, 3.1, 1.4, 0.9, 0.5, 6.1, 9.2, 0.6, 1, 11, 2.4, 1.2, 1.3, 1.3, 0, 1.8, 8, 11, 11, 8.5, 8.5, 1.8, 13, 4.4, 1.4, 2.1, 0.5, 25, 25, 9.3, 6.1, 1.6, 1.5, 19, 19, 24, 9.6, 1.8, 1.4, 1), GPP = c(1.213695235, 3.817313822, 1.267930498, 10.45692825, 3.268295623, 3.505286001, 4.468225245, 0.915653726, 1.635617261, 3.726133898, 1.363453706, 13.99650967, 1.581182762, 0.417618143, 0.741080504, 1.366790205, 0.969326797, 0.412440872, 1.780215366, 3.515743675, 8.248491445, 0.125726306, 13.958807...

...'SJava' ... checking for java... /opt/j2sdk1.4.2_06//bin/java Java VM /opt/j2sdk1.4.2_06//bin/java checking for javah... /opt/j2sdk1.4.2_06//bin/javah Looking in /opt/j2sdk1.4.2_06/include Looking in /opt/j2sdk1.4.2_06/include/linux checking for g++... no checking for c++... no checking for gpp... gpp checking for C++ compiler default output... b.out checking whether the C++ compiler works... configure: error: cannot run C++ compiled programs. If you meant to cross compile, use `--host'. See `config.log' for more details. ERROR: configuration failed for package 'SJava'

...programs, excellent! But for > the C++ it was a bit of a shock to see a 100x increase in size. The > execution time is 2-fold, but the programs are to simple and too fast > to make any difference meaningful. with llvm-g++ from subversion, and on x86-64 linux, I also see that virtual.llvm-gpp is larger than virtual.gpp, but by a factor of 3. The sizes of the .o files are: g++: 9704 bytes llvm-g++: 10728 bytes so the size difference comes from linking. If I link them both using g++ then the final executable sizes are: g++: 19881 bytes llvm-g++: 21721 bytes so the actual difference i...

Hello R users, The code below is for loop in R that I want to do to following calculation at each time i and i-1 in 2:75 dataset (Litterfall_Ahmed97). ac = ((LeafBiog at date i -LeafBiog at date i-1, dataset = leafbiom97) + (littperiod at date i, dataset= Litterfall_Ahmed97))/(sum (GPP from date i-1 to date i, dataset=GPP_Ahmed13)/2) . #code for loop GPP_Ahmed13$Date <- as.Date(GPP_Ahmed13$Date, '%Y/%m/%d') Litterfall_Ahmed97$Date <- as.Date(Litterfall_Ahmed97$Date, '%Y/%m/%d') leafbiom97$Date <- as.Date( leafbiom97$Date, '%Y/%m/%d') for (i in 2...

Hi all, Disclaimer: I'm a long time gnu toolchain user for unix and just got interested in llvm this week, so my questions could be *very* naive. I've read lots of the good documentation on the website and wiki, tutorials, reference manual etc. and have been following this list for a few days. But there's still a lot to read, so excuse me if the answers are already on some FAQ,

Hi everyone, I have encountered this problem while using 'segmented' plugin for R i386 2.15.0 (for Windows 32bit OS) and I just cannot find neither explanation nor solution for it. I am trying to run this data gpp temp 1.661 5 5.028 10 9.772 15 8.692 20 5.693 25 6.293 30 7.757 5 4.604 10 8.763 15 8.134 20 4.616 25 8.417 30 3.483 5 5.046 10 8.306 15 9.142 20 4.686 25 7.301 30 and with the 'segmented' I wanted to find the brakepoint for the curve, however I get this error mesasge: Error in 1:ncol(U)...

...to R for colleagues that want a free build of the model with the same type of I/O. The Matlab model reads a text file with the initial parameters specified as: C:\Data\Carluc\Rport>more Params.R # Number of years to simulate nYears = 50; # Initial year for graphing purposes year0 = 1970; # NPP/GPP ratio (cpp0 unitless) fnr = 0.30; # Quantum efficency qe = 0.040; That is, there are four input variables (for this run - there can be many more) written in a way that R can understand them. In R, I can have the model source the parameter text file easily enough and have the objects in the worksp...

...Either I underestimate the amount of floating point math that is done, or you underestimate the problems with dynamic range that will be encountered. I think it will take more than "a few tweaks and a recompile". I admit I am rather ignorant of the ARM. But I do know that it is more of a GPP than a DSP. Why is it popular for MP3 decoding? Is it mainly a case of overall popularity of the chip and availability of tools? Gregory Maxwell said, "There is a specific product based on ARM which vorbis has been ported to. " What is this product? Is the source code available? Is...

On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Duncan Sands<baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > with llvm-g++ from subversion, and on x86-64 linux, I also see that > virtual.llvm-gpp is larger than virtual.gpp, but by a factor of 3. Hi Duncan, I'm using mainstream 2.5 (from Ubuntu repo). I should be compiling the svn tree this weekend, though. > The sizes of the .o files are: >  g++: 9704 bytes >  llvm-g++: 10728 bytes > so the size difference comes from lin...

...between *people*. It gives me the same weird feeling as if an > e-postcard service were to automatically add "Love you mom" when I > choose to send an e-postcard to my mom; it is just something which the > software doesn't seem entitled to write on my behalf. A bit like the GPP components installed by Sirius Cybernetics on the Heart of Gold... - Chuck THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its...

Found my answer for those who would like to know: Profile Rule: [--key $A]http://your.addre.ss/$B/$MAC.cfg GPP A: urtopsecretultrasecureaesencryptionkey GPP B: OddBallDirectory123098 Hope that helps someone! Curt -----Original Message----- From: Curt Shaffer [mailto:cshaffer@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 11:35 AM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subje...

...2, complexity=1, perceptual_enh=0) on the DSP C64+ side without any issues; the voice sounds very good for such a low bandwidth requirement. However, recently, I tried out the 4kbps mode (changing quality to 1) on the DSP and it sounds robotic; if I ported the same 4kbps code to use on the ARM926 (GPP) side of the DaVinci, it sounds fine (no robotic artifacts). So this leads me to think somehow the Speex code is not working properly for 4kbps (and lower) on the DSP C64+ processor side (6kbps sounds good as mentioned above). I followed the ti speex_C64_test trunk example packaged with the Speex...

...edu/R/CRAN/src/contrib/rimage_0.5-7.tar.gz' Content type 'application/x-gzip' length 331029 bytes opened URL ================================================== downloaded 323Kb * Installing *source* package 'rimage' ... checking for g++... no checking for c++... no checking for gpp... no checking for aCC... no checking for CC... no checking for cxx... no checking for cc++... no checking for cl... no checking for FCC... no checking for KCC... no checking for RCC... no checking for xlC_r... no checking for xlC... no checking for C++ compiler default output... configure: error:...

...know where to go from here. More importantly, I need to have a workable solution - My question to the A@H gang was whether oh323 works (before I actually tried to install it). Here's the error (or where it starts). vpwlib/ChangeLog checking for g++... no checking for c++... no checking for gpp... no checking for aCC... no checking for CC... no checking for cxx... no checking for cc++... no checking for cl... no checking for FCC... no checking for KCC... no checking for RCC... no checking for xlC_r... no checking for xlC... no checking for C++ compiler default output... configure: error:...

...ceptual_enh=0) on the > DSP C64+ side without any issues; the voice sounds very good for such > a low bandwidth requirement. However, recently, I tried out the > 4kbps mode (changing quality to 1) on the DSP and it sounds robotic; > if I ported the same 4kbps code to use on the ARM926 (GPP) side of > the DaVinci, it sounds fine (no robotic artifacts). I assume both builds had fixed-point enabled, right? > So this leads me > to think somehow the Speex code is not working properly for 4kbps > (and lower) on the DSP C64+ processor side (6kbps sounds good as > mentioned...

...Unfortunately I can not even compile with default (no 3dnow) options. ./configure goes fine including this part: checking whether to build static libraries... yes checking whether -lc should be explicitly linked in... no creating libtool checking for g++... no checking for c++... no checking for gpp... no but the when I make it bombs out with: Making all in libFLAC++ make[2]: Entering directory `/home/robin/flac-1.0.4/src/libFLAC++' source='file_decoder.cc' object='file_decoder.lo' libtool=yes \ depfile='.deps/file_decoder.Plo' tmpdepfile='.deps/file_decoder.T...