search for: gpl3

...folks, AFAIK CentOS uses RedHat's source RPMs for building the next CentOS release. I am not sure about the bootstrap procedure and the infra- structure packages, so lets put these corner cases aside. RedHat's "regular" binary and source packages are based on open source (GPL2, GPL3, Apache license, whatever). For building the binary RPMs other open source RPMs with compatible license conditions are used. My question is: Are RedHat's binary RPMs "poisoned" somehow, making it impossible for CentOS to redistribute RedHat's *binary* packages without going to j...

Hi Damjan, > This sounds like a dead end as newer binutils are GPLv3. Unfortunately, you have to live with this. Until recently binutils were quite buggy wrt thumb2 code, so, most probably you will need new binutils in any case. -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University

On 22 June 2011 19:18, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote: > Unfortunately, you have to live with this. Until recently binutils > were quite buggy wrt thumb2 code, so, most probably you will need new > binutils in any case. Hi Anton, It's not so simple. GPL3 can be quite a nuisance to change and even to use. This is why LLVM is becoming to popular for ARM... ;) Jim, how much work would you reckon it'll take to have a working assembler? cheers, --renato

..."%s: expected %zd bytes for %d-level guest, got %d!\n", __func__, sizeof(r->gpl2), h->v->guest_paging_levels, ri->extra_words * 4); dump_unexpected_and_exit(ri); @@ -5754,7 +5754,7 @@ case 3: if(sizeof(r->gpl3) != ri->extra_words * 4) { - fprintf(warn, "%s: expected %d bytes for %d-level guest, got %d!\n", + fprintf(warn, "%s: expected %zd bytes for %d-level guest, got %d!\n", __func__, sizeof(r->gpl3), h->v->guest_paging...

...on Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote: >> Unfortunately, you have to live with this. Until recently binutils >> were quite buggy wrt thumb2 code, so, most probably you will need new >> binutils in any case. > > Hi Anton, > > It's not so simple. GPL3 can be quite a nuisance to change and even to > use. This is why LLVM is becoming to popular for ARM... ;) > > Jim, how much work would you reckon it'll take to have a working assembler? > You mean to patch the old binutils to support this old instruction? Very easy, I'd expe...

A few of you sounded interested in using it. I haven''t explicitly put a software license on it, so I guess it''s not technically FOSS yet. What licenses are good? BSD? Public Domain? ? Jenna -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/camping-list/attachments/20120502/96b87580/attachment.html>

...container. The only two things that you can't do with theoracomment that you can with vorbis comment are: 1. run a command and then enter the tags from console 2. use error codes in the same way If anybody has any suggestions on changes or additions to these scripts, let me know. They are GPL3-ed, so you can use them and pass them along if you like. - Volodya -- http://freedom.libsyn.com/ Echo of Freedom, Radical Podcast "None of us are free until all of us are free." ~ Mihail Bakunin -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspe...

...y contented. That isn’t my impression. Everyone that I have spoken to is in favor of the patent termination clauses (including the FSF: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.en.html#apache2). The only complexity I’ve heard is that it introduces is a potential compatibility issue with GPL2 (GPL3 and other licenses are fine), which is addressed by the exception clause. > I want to make sure that those are the goals used to justify a > (potential) license change. There are additional goals. Our current structure is broken in various ways (which I don’t want to enumerate in public),...

>>> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=llvm_gcc_dragonegg28&num=1 >>> as of version 2.8, LLVM is generating slower code than the newer GCCs >>> but generates the code more quickly. >>> >> >> I would be more concerned about the 'unable to compile', or 'compiled >> code not working correctly' issues. It

...S uses RedHat's source RPMs for building the next CentOS >release. I am not sure about the bootstrap procedure and the infra- >structure packages, so lets put these corner cases aside. > >RedHat's "regular" binary and source packages are based on open source >(GPL2, GPL3, Apache license, whatever). For building the binary RPMs >other open source RPMs with compatible license conditions are used. > >My question is: > >Are RedHat's binary RPMs "poisoned" somehow, making it impossible for >CentOS to redistribute RedHat's *binary* pac...

...gt; copy_ccache_48.o} gmake: *** [all] Error 1 Looking on the system for com_err.h I find: new103# cd / new103# find ./ -name 'com_err.h' -print ./usr/include/krb5/com_err.h ./usr/src/crypto/external/bsd/heimdal/dist/lib/com_err/com_err.h ./usr/src/external/gpl3/gcc/dist/fixincludes/tests/base/com_err.h ./usr/src/gnu/dist/gcc4/fixincludes/tests/base/com_err.h ./usr/local/samba-4.1.7/source4/heimdal/lib/com_err/com_err.h new103# Can someone point me in the right direction to determining how to get past this issue? I have tried ./configure -...

Hi Edwin, >> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=llvm_gcc_dragonegg28&num=1 >> as of version 2.8, LLVM is generating slower code than the newer GCCs >> but generates the code more quickly. >> > > I would be more concerned about the 'unable to compile', or 'compiled > code not working correctly' issues. It would help if they

Thanks everyone, a set of wrapper routines it will be then. Dustin, are the routines you wrote open source or do you know if there is already a project that provides such a portable interface to libc for LLVM? If not, I'll write my own routines, but if there is a way to adopt a common standard or avoid reinventing the wheel I'm all for it. Mike

...50? for a year for the hosting at OVH, so of course I won't display some advertising area on this site. (Some people think that TS is not free because they think I host videos and because there no mention about any licence or "term of use", but Pligg is on GPL2, ITheora will be on GPL3 (I didn't know if it was compatible with Cortado license, but now yes) and all the vid?os are licensed by their owner. (I have try to explain in the "Host a video" page but it's seem to be not enough)) The third step is the hosting, as the model of developpement is a little b...

...korobeynikov.info> wrote: >>> Unfortunately, you have to live with this. Until recently binutils >>> were quite buggy wrt thumb2 code, so, most probably you will need new >>> binutils in any case. >> >> Hi Anton, >> >> It's not so simple. GPL3 can be quite a nuisance to change and even to >> use. This is why LLVM is becoming to popular for ARM... ;) >> >> Jim, how much work would you reckon it'll take to have a working assembler? >> > > You mean to patch the old binutils to support this old instructio...

...korobeynikov.info> wrote: >>> Unfortunately, you have to live with this. Until recently binutils >>> were quite buggy wrt thumb2 code, so, most probably you will need new >>> binutils in any case. >> >> Hi Anton, >> >> It's not so simple. GPL3 can be quite a nuisance to change and even to >> use. This is why LLVM is becoming to popular for ARM... ;) >> >> Jim, how much work would you reckon it'll take to have a working assembler? >> > > You mean to patch the old binutils to support this old instructio...

I have been building R-devel daily for years. In the last week or so, R-devel has failed make check with the error in tests/Examples/parallel-Ex.R The specific error is > pkgname <- "parallel" > source(file.path(R.home("share"), "R", "examples-header.R")) > options(warn = 1) > library('parallel') Error in dyn.load(file, DLLpath =

On 02/12/2010 09:51 AM, Chris Lattner wrote: > I think that the point is that you can define your own standard runtime interfaces: > > void *myopen(const char*path) { > return fopen(path, ...); > } Maybe my experience hand-coding LLVM will actually be of some help. What I did for this case is what I think Chris is suggesting--I have a .c file with functions that return

Hi! I've seen many new standards on the Xiph page. Have you thought about creating something like "OggDisk", that would correspond to CD, DVD, BD... disks? I mean data structure (propably on any filesystem) that could be used for audio and video (and perhaps for images too?). Desired features: - Ogg centric - designed to be filesystem/disk type independant (so that you can use

...e than give. Obviously a long answer to the GPL point of licensing. Please consider the long term and how it will effect people that use opensource, and especially Xorg drivers. Honestly, I can't believe I'm defending the GPL after close to 20 years when it started to change with GPL2 and GPL3, but I now believe it is for all of or good. I see better why Stallman changed the conditions of the GPL now. Alan