Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "gpdfit".
Did you mean:
gpdf
2007 May 02
0
KS test pvalue estimation using mctest (library truncgof)
...truncated sample.
>From an empirical sample I've estimated a generalized pareto
distribution parameters (xi, beta, threshold) (I've used fExtremes pkg).
I'm in doubt on what of the following command is the most appropriate:
Let:
x<-sample
t<-threshold
xt<-x[x>t]
xihat<-gpdFit(x, threshold=t, type = "pwm")$par.ests[1]
betahat<-gpdFit(x, threshold=t, type = "pwm")$par.ests[2]
(1)
ks.test(xt,"pgpd",list(xi=xihat,beta=betahat),H=t,estfun =
"as.list(gpdFit(x, 0)$par.ests)", tol = 1e-02)
(2)
ks.test(xt,"pgpd",list(xi=xihat,...
2006 Jan 30
1
fExtreme packages
...Extremes:
data(danish)
xmpExtremes("\nStart: Simulate a GPD Distributed Sample > ")
x = gpdSim(model = list(shape = 0.25, location = 0, scale = 1), n = 1000)
Error in rgpd(n = n, xi = model$shape, mu = model$location, beta =
model$scale) : unused argument(s) (mu ...)
fit = gpdFit(danish, threshold = 10, type = "mle")
> par(mfrow = c(1, 1))
> gpdtailPlot(fit, main = "Danish Fire: GPD Tail Estimate", col =
"steelblue4")
Error in as.numeric(gpd.obj$upper.exceed) :
argument "gpd.obj" is missing, with no default
2007 Jul 19
1
Questions regarding R and fitting GARCH models
Dear all,
I've recently switched from EViews to R with RMetrics/fSeries (newest
version of july 10) for my analysis because of the much bigger
flexibility it offers. So far my experiences had been great -prior I
had already worked extensively with S-Plus so was already kind of
familiar with the language- until I got to the fSeries package.
My problem with the documentation of fSeries is that