search for: googletestadvancedguide

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "googletestadvancedguide".

2008 Dec 28
1
[LLVMdev] [Patch] Adding unit tests to LLVM
.... > > Gtest is much more lightweight, no comparison there. I know that llvm is > not very good with exceptions, but should a test case system support that? > GTest allows testing for exceptions, it just doesn't require them to work properly: http://code.google.com/p/googletest/wiki/GoogleTestAdvancedGuide#Exception_Assertions > Sample usage of GTest: > http://code.google.com/p/googletest/source/browse/trunk/samples/sample5_unittest.cc > GTest-specific LOC besides the #include statement: 0. > > I think it links to a library as well. > Yes, that's true -- just about any unittes...
2008 Dec 28
0
[LLVMdev] [Patch] Adding unit tests to LLVM
On Dec 27, 2008, at 7:41 PM, Misha Brukman wrote: > 2008/12/27 Mark Kromis <greybird at mac.com> > Just a curiosity question, why push for gtest vs Boost Test or a > different test suite? > I normally use Boost, and their test suite, so I'm more familiar > with that. So I was wondering is one better then the other, or is it > just that someone makes a patch for
2008 Dec 28
5
[LLVMdev] [Patch] Adding unit tests to LLVM
2008/12/27 Mark Kromis <greybird at mac.com> > Just a curiosity question, why push for gtest vs Boost Test or > a different test suite? > I normally use Boost, and their test suite, so I'm more familiar with that. > So I was wondering is one better then the other, or is it just that someone > makes a patch for it? > I looked more into Boost.Test to see what's in