search for: googledevelopers

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "googledevelopers".

2010 May 22
2
The new WebM codec
Hey everyone. If you haven't seen this already, last week was Google I/O the third edition. The event page is : http://code.google.com/events/io/2010/ The youtube channel with the keynotes is : http://www.youtube.com/googledevelopers One of the most interesting things at that conference was the introduction of the WebM codec, which is a combination of On2's VP8 video codec (which is now open sourced) + the Vorbis sound codec with a Matroska (or Matroska derived) container. From what they said, the guys working on the OGG,...
2010 May 22
0
The new WebM codec
...2:06:15PM +0300, Alexandru Ardelean wrote: > Hey everyone. > > If you haven't seen this already, last week was Google I/O the third > edition. > The event page is : http://code.google.com/events/io/2010/ > The youtube channel with the keynotes is : > http://www.youtube.com/googledevelopers > One of the most interesting things at that conference was the introduction > of the WebM codec, which is a combination of On2's VP8 video codec (which is > now open sourced) + the Vorbis sound codec with a Matroska (or Matroska > derived) container. We briefly discussed this on I...
2013 Mar 14
0
Higher compression modes from Flake
...p, still used today in PNG, gzip, zlib, etc). 100% compatible with every web browser that can already decode the data. Not a new format, just the best that gzip/zlib can be. There is a huge increase in CPU requirement for compression, but that only has to be done once for each source file. http://googledevelopers.blogspot.ie/2013/02/compress-data-more-densely-with-zopfli.html "Zopfli is best suited for applications where data is compressed once and sent over a network many times, for example, static content for the web." The compressed output is "only" 3-8% smaller than the best that z...
2013 Mar 14
3
Higher compression modes from Flake
On 14-03-13 20:02, Declan Kelly wrote: > The next official release of the FLAC command line should really have > a "-9" option for absolute maxed-out big-memory CPU-burning compression. No. If you want such things, try TAK, OptimFROG, Monkey's Audio or even LA, you'll lose hardware compatibility anyway and they do much better than FLAC will with a -9 option. FLAC 1.0
2013 Mar 15
3
flac-dev Digest, Vol 100, Issue 36
..., etc). > 100% compatible with every web browser that can already decode the data. > Not a new format, just the best that gzip/zlib can be. > > There is a huge increase in CPU requirement for compression, but that > only has to be done once for each source file. > > > http://googledevelopers.blogspot.ie/2013/02/compress-data-more-densely-with-zopfli.html > > "Zopfli is best suited for applications where data is compressed once > and sent over a network many times, for example, static content for the > web." > > The compressed output is "only" 3-8%...