Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "googledevelopers".
2010 May 22
2
The new WebM codec
Hey everyone.
If you haven't seen this already, last week was Google I/O the third
edition.
The event page is : http://code.google.com/events/io/2010/
The youtube channel with the keynotes is :
http://www.youtube.com/googledevelopers
One of the most interesting things at that conference was the introduction
of the WebM codec, which is a combination of On2's VP8 video codec (which is
now open sourced) + the Vorbis sound codec with a Matroska (or Matroska
derived) container. From what they said, the guys working on the OGG,...
2010 May 22
0
The new WebM codec
...2:06:15PM +0300, Alexandru Ardelean wrote:
> Hey everyone.
>
> If you haven't seen this already, last week was Google I/O the third
> edition.
> The event page is : http://code.google.com/events/io/2010/
> The youtube channel with the keynotes is :
> http://www.youtube.com/googledevelopers
> One of the most interesting things at that conference was the introduction
> of the WebM codec, which is a combination of On2's VP8 video codec (which is
> now open sourced) + the Vorbis sound codec with a Matroska (or Matroska
> derived) container.
We briefly discussed this on I...
2013 Mar 14
0
Higher compression modes from Flake
...p, still used
today in PNG, gzip, zlib, etc).
100% compatible with every web browser that can already decode the data.
Not a new format, just the best that gzip/zlib can be.
There is a huge increase in CPU requirement for compression, but that
only has to be done once for each source file.
http://googledevelopers.blogspot.ie/2013/02/compress-data-more-densely-with-zopfli.html
"Zopfli is best suited for applications where data is compressed once
and sent over a network many times, for example, static content for the
web."
The compressed output is "only" 3-8% smaller than the best that z...
2013 Mar 14
3
Higher compression modes from Flake
On 14-03-13 20:02, Declan Kelly wrote:
> The next official release of the FLAC command line should really have
> a "-9" option for absolute maxed-out big-memory CPU-burning compression.
No. If you want such things, try TAK, OptimFROG, Monkey's Audio or even
LA, you'll lose hardware compatibility anyway and they do much better
than FLAC will with a -9 option. FLAC 1.0
2013 Mar 15
3
flac-dev Digest, Vol 100, Issue 36
..., etc).
> 100% compatible with every web browser that can already decode the data.
> Not a new format, just the best that gzip/zlib can be.
>
> There is a huge increase in CPU requirement for compression, but that
> only has to be done once for each source file.
>
>
> http://googledevelopers.blogspot.ie/2013/02/compress-data-more-densely-with-zopfli.html
>
> "Zopfli is best suited for applications where data is compressed once
> and sent over a network many times, for example, static content for the
> web."
>
> The compressed output is "only" 3-8%...