search for: goodmi

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 275 matches for "goodmi".

Did you mean: goodmis
2018 Nov 19
0
Patch "x86/cpu/vmware: Do not trace vmware_sched_clock()" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree
...in the queue-4.14 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable at vger.kernel.org> know about it. >From 15035388439f892017d38b05214d3cda6578af64 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt at goodmis.org> Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 15:22:07 -0500 Subject: x86/cpu/vmware: Do not trace vmware_sched_clock() From: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt at goodmis.org> commit 15035388439f892017d38b05214d3cda6578af64 upstream. When running function tracing on a Linux guest running on VMware Worksta...
2018 Nov 19
0
Patch "x86/cpu/vmware: Do not trace vmware_sched_clock()" has been added to the 4.18-stable tree
...in the queue-4.18 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable at vger.kernel.org> know about it. >From 15035388439f892017d38b05214d3cda6578af64 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt at goodmis.org> Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 15:22:07 -0500 Subject: x86/cpu/vmware: Do not trace vmware_sched_clock() From: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt at goodmis.org> commit 15035388439f892017d38b05214d3cda6578af64 upstream. When running function tracing on a Linux guest running on VMware Worksta...
2018 Nov 19
0
Patch "x86/cpu/vmware: Do not trace vmware_sched_clock()" has been added to the 4.19-stable tree
...in the queue-4.19 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable at vger.kernel.org> know about it. >From 15035388439f892017d38b05214d3cda6578af64 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt at goodmis.org> Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 15:22:07 -0500 Subject: x86/cpu/vmware: Do not trace vmware_sched_clock() From: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt at goodmis.org> commit 15035388439f892017d38b05214d3cda6578af64 upstream. When running function tracing on a Linux guest running on VMware Worksta...
2017 Oct 05
2
[RFC v3 20/27] x86/ftrace: Adapt function tracing for PIE support
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 6:06 AM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt at goodmis.org> wrote: > On Wed, 4 Oct 2017 14:19:56 -0700 > Thomas Garnier <thgarnie at google.com> wrote: > >> When using -fPIE/PIC with function tracing, the compiler generates a >> call through the GOT (call *__fentry__ at GOTPCREL). This instruction >> takes 6 bytes...
2017 Oct 05
2
[RFC v3 20/27] x86/ftrace: Adapt function tracing for PIE support
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 6:06 AM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt at goodmis.org> wrote: > On Wed, 4 Oct 2017 14:19:56 -0700 > Thomas Garnier <thgarnie at google.com> wrote: > >> When using -fPIE/PIC with function tracing, the compiler generates a >> call through the GOT (call *__fentry__ at GOTPCREL). This instruction >> takes 6 bytes...
2016 May 25
3
[PATCH] x86/paravirt: Do not trace _paravirt_ident_*() functions
...0c 83 e8 01 83 e2 30 48 98 48 81 c2 40 6d 01 00 48 03 14 c5 80 6a 5d 82 48 89 0a 8b 41 08 85 c0 75 09 f3 90 8b 41 08 <85> c0 74 f7 4c 8b 09 4d 85 c9 74 08 41 0f 18 09 eb 02 f3 90 8b Reported-by: ?ukasz Daniluk <lukasz.daniluk at intel.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt at goodmis.org> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c b/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c index f08ac28b8136..f975d226be6e 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c @@ -55,12 +55,12 @@ asm (".pushsection .entry.text, \"ax\"\n" ".popsection");...
2016 May 25
3
[PATCH] x86/paravirt: Do not trace _paravirt_ident_*() functions
...0c 83 e8 01 83 e2 30 48 98 48 81 c2 40 6d 01 00 48 03 14 c5 80 6a 5d 82 48 89 0a 8b 41 08 85 c0 75 09 f3 90 8b 41 08 <85> c0 74 f7 4c 8b 09 4d 85 c9 74 08 41 0f 18 09 eb 02 f3 90 8b Reported-by: ?ukasz Daniluk <lukasz.daniluk at intel.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt at goodmis.org> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c b/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c index f08ac28b8136..f975d226be6e 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c @@ -55,12 +55,12 @@ asm (".pushsection .entry.text, \"ax\"\n" ".popsection");...
2019 May 23
2
[RFC][PATCH] kernel.h: Add generic roundup_64() macro
From: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt at goodmis.org> In discussing a build failure on x86_32 due to the use of roundup() on a 64 bit number, I realized that there's no generic equivalent roundup_64(). It is implemented in two separate places in the kernel, but there really should be just one that all can use. Although the other impleme...
2007 Aug 08
19
Introducing paravirt_ops for x86_64
Hi folks, After some time away from it, and a big rebase as a consequence, here is the updated version of paravirt_ops for x86_64, heading to inclusion. Your criticism is of course, very welcome. Have fun -- arch/x86_64/Kconfig | 11 arch/x86_64/ia32/syscall32.c | 2 arch/x86_64/kernel/Makefile | 1 arch/x86_64/kernel/apic.c | 2
2007 Aug 08
19
Introducing paravirt_ops for x86_64
Hi folks, After some time away from it, and a big rebase as a consequence, here is the updated version of paravirt_ops for x86_64, heading to inclusion. Your criticism is of course, very welcome. Have fun -- arch/x86_64/Kconfig | 11 arch/x86_64/ia32/syscall32.c | 2 arch/x86_64/kernel/Makefile | 1 arch/x86_64/kernel/apic.c | 2
2007 Aug 10
9
[PATCH 0/25 -v2] paravirt_ops for x86_64, second round
Here is an slightly updated version of the paravirt_ops patch. If your comments and criticism were welcome before, now it's even more! There are some issues that are _not_ addressed in this revision, and here are the causes: * split debugreg into multiple functions, suggested by Andi: - Me and jsfg agree that introducing more pvops (specially 14!) is not worthwhile. So, although we do
2007 Aug 10
9
[PATCH 0/25 -v2] paravirt_ops for x86_64, second round
Here is an slightly updated version of the paravirt_ops patch. If your comments and criticism were welcome before, now it's even more! There are some issues that are _not_ addressed in this revision, and here are the causes: * split debugreg into multiple functions, suggested by Andi: - Me and jsfg agree that introducing more pvops (specially 14!) is not worthwhile. So, although we do
2007 Dec 12
5
[PATCH 0/6] paravirt patches - the non-integration part
Hi, This series corresponds do older patches in the paravirt series that was neither already applied, nor I will touch again. In general, they do not touch code that can be unified (at least, without being the unification a big problem on its own). They passed through this list a lot of times, so I feel them ready for inclusion, unless someone opposes. As with the other patches, they apply to
2007 Dec 12
5
[PATCH 0/6] paravirt patches - the non-integration part
Hi, This series corresponds do older patches in the paravirt series that was neither already applied, nor I will touch again. In general, they do not touch code that can be unified (at least, without being the unification a big problem on its own). They passed through this list a lot of times, so I feel them ready for inclusion, unless someone opposes. As with the other patches, they apply to
2007 Aug 15
13
[PATCH 0/25][V3] pvops_64 last round (hopefully)
This is hopefully the last iteration of the pvops64 patch. >From the last version, we have only one change, which is include/asm-x86_64/processor.h: There were still one survivor in raw asm. Also, git screwed me up for some reason, and the 25th patch was missing the new files, paravirt.{c,h}. (although I do remember having git-add'ed it, but who knows...) Andrew, could you please push it
2007 Aug 15
13
[PATCH 0/25][V3] pvops_64 last round (hopefully)
This is hopefully the last iteration of the pvops64 patch. >From the last version, we have only one change, which is include/asm-x86_64/processor.h: There were still one survivor in raw asm. Also, git screwed me up for some reason, and the 25th patch was missing the new files, paravirt.{c,h}. (although I do remember having git-add'ed it, but who knows...) Andrew, could you please push it
2007 Nov 09
11
[PATCH 0/24] paravirt_ops for unified x86 - that's me again!
Hey folks, Here's a new spin of the pvops64 patch series. We didn't get that many comments from the last time, so it should be probably almost ready to get in. Heya! >From the last version, the most notable changes are: * consolidation of system.h, merging jeremy's comments about ordering concerns * consolidation of smp functions that goes through smp_ops. They're sharing
2007 Nov 09
11
[PATCH 0/24] paravirt_ops for unified x86 - that's me again!
Hey folks, Here's a new spin of the pvops64 patch series. We didn't get that many comments from the last time, so it should be probably almost ready to get in. Heya! >From the last version, the most notable changes are: * consolidation of system.h, merging jeremy's comments about ordering concerns * consolidation of smp functions that goes through smp_ops. They're sharing
2018 Nov 09
0
[PATCH] x86/vmware: Do not trace vmware_sched_clock()
From: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt at goodmis.org> When running function tracing on a Linux guest running on VMware Workstation, the guest would crash. This is due to tracing of the sched_clock internal call of the VMware vmware_sched_clock(), which causes an infinite recursion within the tracing code (clock calls must not be traced). Ma...
2018 Nov 19
0
[PATCH 4.19 118/205] x86/cpu/vmware: Do not trace vmware_sched_clock()
4.19-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt at goodmis.org> commit 15035388439f892017d38b05214d3cda6578af64 upstream. When running function tracing on a Linux guest running on VMware Workstation, the guest would crash. This is due to tracing of the sched_clock internal call of the VMware vmware_sched_clock(), which causes an infinite recursion wi...