search for: goldweb

Hi again! Tomasz Ciolek <tmc@goldweb.com.au> on 13.11.2001 01:21:27 An: Thomas Schweikle <tschweikle@fiducia.de> Kopie: Thema: Re: rsync exclude/include [FIDUCIA virengepr?ft - ohne Gew?hr, da? alle bekannten Viren und deren Varianten erkannt wurden.] > Try dumoping the whole file list into a text file, prefi...

Tomasz Ciolek <tmc@goldweb.com.au> on 13.11.2001 01:51:25 An: Thomas Schweikle <tschweikle@fiducia.de> Kopie: "Tomasz Ciolek <tmc" Thema: Re: rsync exclude/include [FIDUCIA virengepr?ft - ohne Gew?hr, da? alle bekannten Viren und deren Varianten erkannt wurden.] > Umm loose the spac...

Hi, I've got a Debian 3.0 machine from which I initiate rsync connections over ssh to winNT/2k boxen, where sshd is running as a service, to grab files from the windows machines. I don't get any error from either side of the connection. The directory I indicate is transferred as well as every sub directory, just not any of the files in the sub directories. The process seems to be running

There's nothing in rsync to do that. How about making the files and directories all belong to another user, set the sticky bit and write for your rsync user on the directories, unset write for the files, and rsync that way, then chown afterwards? the updates to existing files will fail, leaving you only with new. Tim Conway tim.conway@philips.com 303.682.4917 Philips Semiconductor -

...globbing functions (if rsync uses them) on solaris or some such... Any isnights or pointers would be appreceated. Regards Tomasz Ciolek -- Tomasz M. Ciolek * * Everything falls under the law of change; <tmc@dreamcraft.com.au> * Like a dream, a phantom, a bubble, a shadow, <tmc@goldweb.com.au> * like dew of flash of lightning. * You should contemplate like this. ******************************************************************************* GPG Key ID: 0x7A18E49D * Available on www.pgp.net *******************************************************************************...

describe "should_not == vs. should !=" it do 5.should_not == 6 end # passes it do 5.should != 6 end # fails end # I''m running the rspec 1.1.2 gem with the corresponding Textmate bundle # The second failure surprises me. # Is != not supported? # I''d like to hear what you all think. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

Hi Folks, I'm running rsync between an NT client and a Solaris 7 Server (Ver 2.4.6). I'd like to be able to exclude the following directory: /opt/IBMHTTPDLOG/archivelogs but retrieve /opt/IBMHTTPDLOG My setup is: rsync -av -p -e rsync@server1.cna.com:/opt/IBMHTTPDLOG/ F:/opt/IBMHTTDLOG (client) rsync --daemon --exclude-from=/etc/rsync.exclude (server) What I get is

I'm running rsync via ssh on two machines connected with 100 Mbit/s Ethernet cards (at high speed) via a Linksys switch. It's all right here in a single closet. I'm sending large files (initial transfer, nothing preexists on the destination machine) and seeing transfer rates in the 2 Mbit/s range. The CPUs on both machines are more than 90% idle, and I upped the --block-size to 256

I'm not sure what broke my samba server, but I *used* to be able to distribute patches for software to my guests from my Samba server. Some time in between, I've upgraded Linux from 2.0.30 to 2.0.32, and I've upgraded the Samba RPM from whatever to 1.9.18p7. Now, I can't even browse the share list without logging on. Any idea what gives? Does anyone have this configuration working

Just wondering if the decisions in the bnetd case might affect Samba at all? http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/doc/2004/bnetd_30sep.pdf From my reading, the judge is claiming that because the bnetd authors didn't have permission to reverse engineer the Battle.Net protocol, they breached copyright by reverse engineering it. Apparently in the USA you can waive your legal rights through