search for: gokhale

Dear Kailas Gokhale, The negative individual variance is not a problem with your code or plm. It a property of your data. Please check the posts of Giovanni Millo on this topic: [R] R: plm random effect: the estimated variance of the individual effect is negative Millo Giovanni Giovanni_Millo at Generali.com Sat...

I have a database with a couple of tables. One table called spares has foreign keys in another called equipment. When I create a new record, it is added to the spares table however the list action does not show all the columns in the table. It only shows those columns that are not foreign keys. I am using the default action generated by scaffold for list. Why is that so? Do i need to re-write my

...f the new pass > manager: The legacy pass manager could have been modified to not free > all analyses, but like the NPM keep a global map of all analyses run > so far that have not been invalidated yet. > > Michael > > > > Am Mo., 9. Nov. 2020 um 05:28 Uhr schrieb sushant gokhale via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>: > > > > Hi, > > > > In following link: > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?reload=9&v=6X12D46sRFw > > > > They have specified that the inliner can't use > DomTree/LoopInfo/MemorySSA analysis. &g...

Hi, In following link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?reload=9&v=6X12D46sRFw They have specified that the inliner can't use DomTree/LoopInfo/MemorySSA analysis. 1. What's the reason for this? 2. Why can't we do it using getAnalysisUsage() construct? 3. Can inline use this information in the new Pass Manager? 4. What all information can we derive from DomTree to be of help to

...the primary reason for the introduction of the new pass manager: The legacy pass manager could have been modified to not free all analyses, but like the NPM keep a global map of all analyses run so far that have not been invalidated yet. Michael Am Mo., 9. Nov. 2020 um 05:28 Uhr schrieb sushant gokhale via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>: > > Hi, > > In following link: > https://www.youtube.com/watch?reload=9&v=6X12D46sRFw > > They have specified that the inliner can't use DomTree/LoopInfo/MemorySSA analysis. > 1. What's the reason for this? > 2....

...es: 0 ?***? 0.001 ?**? 0.01 ?*? 0.05 ?.? 0.1 ? ? 1 Total Sum of Squares: 5548.4 Residual Sum of Squares: 5382.1 R-Squared: 0.037133 Adj. R-Squared: 0.033856 F-statistic: 0.479037 on 2 and 31 DF, p-value: 0.62389Warning message:In sqrt(sigma2) : NaNs produced with warm regards kailas D. Gokhale

...amp on Ruby and Ruby on Rails at Pune,India. Seating is limited to 15 people. Seat allocation will be strictly on a first-come-first-serve basis. Details below: Date: 21st June thru 25th June 2006 Time: 9:00 am to 6:00 pm Place: SICSR,Pune Address: SICSR,Atur Center,Gokhale Cross Road,Model Colony. Pune - 411016,India Cost: Rs. 6,000.00 per person per day (group discounts available) Facilities: Computers (Windows OS) with broadband Internet access/Wifi Instructor/Trainer: Dibya Prakash Lab Assistant: Vikrant Chaudhari Contact: Va...

Chris Lattner wrote: > On Fri, 19 Dec 2003, Yueqiang wrote: > > >>In high level languge there are usually have time and sync instruction, >>to handle async and sync operation. >>I want to know how LLVM take an count of these. > > > I'm not sure exactly what 'time' and 'sync' operations you're talking > about, or what languages

On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 13:01, Vipin Gokhale wrote: > While on the subject of annotating bytecode with analysis info, could I > entice someone to also think about carrying other types of source-level > annotations through into bytecode ? This is particularly useful for > situations where one wants to use LLVM infrastructure for...

I''ve got a User model, which holds the following (excerpt): def try_to_authenticate User.authenticate(self.username, self.password) end .. private def self.hash_password(password) Digest::SHA1.hexdigest(password) end def self.authenticate(username, password) @user = User.find(:all, :conditions => ["username = ? AND password = ?",

Chris Lattner wrote: > On Sun, 16 Nov 2003, Reid Spencer wrote: > > >>On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 11:17, Chris Lattner wrote: >> >> >>>No, it's all or nothing. Once linked, they cannot be seperated (easily). >>>However, especially when using the JIT, there is little overhead for >>>running a gigantic program that only has 1% of the functions

Hi, I have 4 questions: 1. In legacy pass manager, we have following sequence of code in PassManagerBuilder.cpp PM.add( some_function_pass_1() ) PM.add( some_function_pass_2() ) why is it that we add function pass to a module pass manager? And does these 2 statements create 2 function pass managers ? 2. In new pass manager, the above code would look something like this. FunctionPassManager

Hello, I am planning to develop a management application for managing Redhat Xen and Redhat KVM hypervisors. I am evaluating the Java bindings versus the C++ version of libvirt. As part of evaluation, I could not find meaningful answers to the questions below. Hence, I thought that people on this mailing list would be the most appropriate to comment on them. Can you please let me know your views?

I am trying to do a similar thing for some spares that I am trying to manage... My spare.rb file is as under class Spare < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :department, :class_name => ''department'', :foreign_key => ''department_id'' belongs_to :subequipment, class_name => ''subequipment'', :foreign_key =>