search for: goeman

Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "goeman".

2004 Oct 14
3
is.vector() gives error (PR#7288)
Full_Name: Jelle Goeman Version: 2.0.0 OS: windows Submission from: (NULL) (145.88.209.33) I get a strange error: > is.vector(1:10) Error: recursive default argument reference What's recursive about is.vector? Kind regards, Jelle Goeman My R: platform i386-pc-mingw32 arch i386 os mingw3...
2003 Mar 06
1
Some bugs in Rcmd check ? (PR#2608)
...I have some problems using Rcmd, bacause I get errors I do not understand. I will write down what I did. Perhaps you can help me? I have a small would-be package called "globaltest", containing only the files DESCRIPTION INDEX R/globaltest.R man/globaltest.Rd I say: C:\>Rcmd check C:/Goeman/globaltest In the output it first complains that 'sh', 'make', 'cp' are not recognizable commands, programs or batch files. Later it says *** Installation of globaltest failed *** Then it says: * checking R files for library.dynam ...Error: cannot open file 'C://glob...
2004 Jun 28
2
Problem with hasArg and the ... argument (PR#7027)
Full_Name: Jelle Goeman Version: 1.9.0 OS: mingw32, windows 2000 Submission from: (NULL) (145.88.209.33) Hi Everyone, I get very strange results using the function hasArg with the ... function argument. In my own function: > gt <- globaltest(X,Y) > sampling(gt) works fine, but > sampling(globaltest(X,Y)...
2007 Feb 21
1
avoiding a needless function evaluation in optimize() (PR#9523)
Full_Name: Jelle Goeman Version: 2.4.0 OS: windows XP Submission from: (NULL) (145.88.209.33) Hi, I like to use optimize() to optimize functions whose evaluation is costly in terms of computation time. The Brent algorithm which is implemented in optimize was designed to optimize a function with as few function evaluat...
2009 Feb 06
1
Joint test
...delPG2), Terms= c(19:21), H0=c(-2.9101, 2.4028, -1.6504)) #wald.test(b=coef(modelPG2), Sigma = vcov(modelPG2), Terms= c(19:21), H0=c(0, 2.4028, 0)) wald.test(b=coef(modelPG2), Sigma = vcov(modelPG2), Terms= c(25:27), H0=c(-8.2330,2.3041,-0.2626)) Any help would be very much appreciated. Hein Goemans.
2017 Sep 11
2
No more sessions available' / channels not closing issue
...a way to prevent this "leak"? Is there a way to timeout unused channels (not sessions)? We have MaxSessions raised but those will eventually max out too. Thanks in advance, (apologies if this mail is received twice, seem to have run into an SPF issue) Mickel Daelmans Developer Goeman Borgesiuslaan 77 3515 ET Utrecht T. 030-7551560 W. www.addtofavorites.nl<http://www.addtofavorites.nl/> Alles weten over transactionele e-mail? Volg onze mailroad pagina op LinkedIn<https://www.linkedin.com/company/mailroad> === De inhoud van deze e-mail, inclusief bijlagen, is vertrou...
2007 Nov 30
1
Puzzling message: "no man files in this package"
...manual 'Writing R Extensions'. * checking data for non-ASCII characters ... OK * creating penalized-Ex.R ... OK * checking examples ... OK * checking package vignettes in 'inst/doc' ... OK * creating penalized-manual.tex ... OK * checking penalized-manual.tex ... OK www.msbi.nl/goeman
2009 Oct 30
0
different L2 regularization behavior between lrm, glmnet, and penalized? (original question)
...It seems glmnet uses its own peculiar way of defining the penalty, but some choice of scaling should be able to bring glmnet in line as well. Kind regards, Jelle ________________________________ From: Robert V (Bob) Sasseen [mailto:sasseen@ai.sri.com] Sent: 29 October 2009 19:32 To: Goeman, J.J. (MSTAT) Subject: different L2 regularization behavior between lrm, glmnet, and penalized? (original question) Jelle, Below is the original question. The formatting apparently got a bit messed up when it was parsed by the list server. This may be easier to read. Bob -----------...
2009 Oct 14
1
different L2 regularization behavior between lrm, glmnet, and penalized?
The following R code using different packages gives the same results for a simple logistic regression without regularization, but different results with regularization. This may just be a matter of different scaling of the regularization parameters, but if anyone familiar with these packages has insight into why the results differ, I'd appreciate hearing about it. I'm new to