Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "goeman".
2004 Oct 14
3
is.vector() gives error (PR#7288)
Full_Name: Jelle Goeman
Version: 2.0.0
OS: windows
Submission from: (NULL) (145.88.209.33)
I get a strange error:
> is.vector(1:10)
Error: recursive default argument reference
What's recursive about is.vector?
Kind regards,
Jelle Goeman
My R:
platform i386-pc-mingw32
arch i386
os mingw3...
2003 Mar 06
1
Some bugs in Rcmd check ? (PR#2608)
...I have some problems using Rcmd, bacause I get errors I do not understand. I
will write down what I did. Perhaps you can help me?
I have a small would-be package called "globaltest", containing only the
files
DESCRIPTION
INDEX
R/globaltest.R
man/globaltest.Rd
I say:
C:\>Rcmd check C:/Goeman/globaltest
In the output it first complains that 'sh', 'make', 'cp' are not
recognizable commands, programs or batch files.
Later it says
*** Installation of globaltest failed ***
Then it says:
* checking R files for library.dynam ...Error: cannot open file
'C://glob...
2004 Jun 28
2
Problem with hasArg and the ... argument (PR#7027)
Full_Name: Jelle Goeman
Version: 1.9.0
OS: mingw32, windows 2000
Submission from: (NULL) (145.88.209.33)
Hi Everyone,
I get very strange results using the function hasArg with the ... function
argument. In my own function:
> gt <- globaltest(X,Y)
> sampling(gt)
works fine, but
> sampling(globaltest(X,Y)...
2007 Feb 21
1
avoiding a needless function evaluation in optimize() (PR#9523)
Full_Name: Jelle Goeman
Version: 2.4.0
OS: windows XP
Submission from: (NULL) (145.88.209.33)
Hi,
I like to use optimize() to optimize functions whose evaluation is costly in
terms of computation time. The Brent algorithm which is implemented in optimize
was designed to optimize a function with as few function evaluat...
2009 Feb 06
1
Joint test
...delPG2), Terms= c(19:21),
H0=c(-2.9101, 2.4028, -1.6504))
#wald.test(b=coef(modelPG2), Sigma = vcov(modelPG2), Terms= c(19:21),
H0=c(0, 2.4028, 0))
wald.test(b=coef(modelPG2), Sigma = vcov(modelPG2), Terms= c(25:27),
H0=c(-8.2330,2.3041,-0.2626))
Any help would be very much appreciated.
Hein Goemans.
2017 Sep 11
2
No more sessions available' / channels not closing issue
...a way to prevent this "leak"? Is there a way to timeout unused channels (not sessions)? We have MaxSessions raised but those will eventually max out too.
Thanks in advance,
(apologies if this mail is received twice, seem to have run into an SPF issue)
Mickel Daelmans
Developer
Goeman Borgesiuslaan 77
3515 ET Utrecht
T. 030-7551560
W. www.addtofavorites.nl<http://www.addtofavorites.nl/>
Alles weten over transactionele e-mail?
Volg onze mailroad pagina op LinkedIn<https://www.linkedin.com/company/mailroad>
===
De inhoud van deze e-mail, inclusief bijlagen, is vertrou...
2007 Nov 30
1
Puzzling message: "no man files in this package"
...manual 'Writing R
Extensions'.
* checking data for non-ASCII characters ... OK
* creating penalized-Ex.R ... OK
* checking examples ... OK
* checking package vignettes in 'inst/doc' ... OK
* creating penalized-manual.tex ... OK
* checking penalized-manual.tex ... OK
www.msbi.nl/goeman
2009 Oct 30
0
different L2 regularization behavior between lrm, glmnet, and penalized? (original question)
...It
seems glmnet uses its own peculiar way of defining the penalty, but some
choice of scaling should be able to bring glmnet in line as well.
Kind regards,
Jelle
________________________________
From: Robert V (Bob) Sasseen [mailto:sasseen@ai.sri.com]
Sent: 29 October 2009 19:32
To: Goeman, J.J. (MSTAT)
Subject: different L2 regularization behavior between lrm,
glmnet, and penalized? (original question)
Jelle,
Below is the original question. The formatting apparently got a
bit messed up when it was parsed by the list server. This may be easier
to read.
Bob
-----------...
2009 Oct 14
1
different L2 regularization behavior between lrm, glmnet, and penalized?
The following R code using different packages gives the same results for a
simple logistic regression without regularization, but different results
with regularization. This may just be a matter of different scaling of the
regularization parameters, but if anyone familiar with these packages has
insight into why the results differ, I'd appreciate hearing about it. I'm
new to