search for: godsend

Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> writes: >> There's a big reason to keep it. It's a godsend when trying to bugpoint >> something where no working llc is available. I've used it quite a lot >> during AVX development, for example. It's useful for developing any >> new target. > > an alternative is to make the interpreter more powerful and have bugpoint >...

We need to resell systems that run commercial software on Linux. We were using Red Hat ES 3 originally. But we later realize that we cannot redistribute RHES without paying them huge subscription fee because of the trademark. I came across CentOS from WBEL mailing list. This looks like a godsend to me. I have some questions regarding CentOS. I would appreciate it if someone can provide me the answers: 1. Can I use your package to install a machine for resell? Is there fee involved? Do you have any EULA that I can get? 2. I believe it is RHES based, what is the version matrix correspon...

Dear List, I'm using Sweave to produce a series of class handouts for a course I am running. The students in previous years have commented about wanting output within the handouts so they can see what to expect the output to look like. So Sweave is a godsend for producing this type of handout - with one exception: Is there a way to suppress some rows of printed output so as to save space in the printed documentation? E.g rnorm(100) produces about 20 lines of output (depending on options("width")). I'd prefer something like: rnorm(10...

...certificates. I think the PKI system has way way way to many root certificates as it is. I want a world where DANE validates most certificates, and only a few root certificates are needed for things like banks where EV certificates are a must. DANE as a way to validate S/MIME I think will be a godsend to e-mail security, I hope clients implement it.

...ently generates aligned vector loads of unaligned data. > In short, I don't see a compelling reason to rip it out anytime soon. > If it ends up being completely broken for simple programs, it might > make sense to remove in the future. There's a big reason to keep it. It's a godsend when trying to bugpoint something where no working llc is available. I've used it quite a lot during AVX development, for example. It's useful for developing any new target. -Dave

...we're contemplating switching to ZFS. As of last spring, it appears that ZFS On Linux http://zfsonlinux.org/ calls itself production ready despite a version number of 0.6.2, and being acknowledged as unstable on 32 bit systems. However, given the need to do backups, zfs send sounds like a godsend over rsync which is running into scaling problems of its own. (EG: Nightly backups are being threatened by the possibility of taking over 24 hours per backup) Was wondering if anybody here could weigh in with real-life experience? Performance/scalability? -Ben PS: I joined their mailing list...

...loads of > unaligned data. > >> In short, I don't see a compelling reason to rip it out anytime soon. >> If it ends up being completely broken for simple programs, it might >> make sense to remove in the future. > > There's a big reason to keep it. It's a godsend when trying to bugpoint > something where no working llc is available. I've used it quite a lot > during AVX development, for example. It's useful for developing any > new target. an alternative is to make the interpreter more powerful and have bugpoint use it rather than the C...

On 11/15/10 11:17 AM, David A. Greene wrote: > Duncan Sands<baldrick at free.fr> writes: > >>> There's a big reason to keep it. It's a godsend when trying to bugpoint >>> something where no working llc is available. I've used it quite a lot >>> during AVX development, for example. It's useful for developing any >>> new target. >> an alternative is to make the interpreter more powerful and have bu...

...way way way to many root certificates as it >> is. I want a world where DANE validates most certificates, and only a >> few root certificates are needed for things like banks where EV >> certificates are a must. >> >> DANE as a way to validate S/MIME I think will be a godsend to e-mail >> security, I hope clients implement it. >> _______________________________________________ >> CentOS mailing list >> CentOS at centos.org >> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > _______________________________________________ > Cent...

On Nov 15, 2010, at 9:22 AM, John Criswell wrote: > On 11/15/10 11:17 AM, David A. Greene wrote: >> Duncan Sands<baldrick at free.fr> writes: >> >>>> There's a big reason to keep it. It's a godsend when trying to bugpoint >>>> something where no working llc is available. I've used it quite a lot >>>> during AVX development, for example. It's useful for developing any >>>> new target. >>> an alternative is to make the interpreter more powe...

...on. This is a complex topic though, and > there are multiple considerations, and not everyone agrees with me > here. It's true that a target-independent predicated IR isn't going to translate well to a target that doesn't have predication. However, for targets that do it's a godsend. > One thing that's initially counter-intuitive is that SIMD predication > cannot be done in the same way as scalar or VLIW predication, where > the majority of the compiler works as if it's on a "normal" scalar > machine and predication happens during codegen, where...

Hi, First off, thanks Ezra for showing the way with BackgrounDrb. It''s a real godsend. I wanted to add a bit of job control to the system so that I could cancel DRB processes and so on. I thought I''d share how I did it in case anyone should find it useful or have feedback. I wanted to be able to put checkpoints into the drb job so that I could let the job do whatever need...

...s it >>>> is. I want a world where DANE validates most certificates, and only a >>>> few root certificates are needed for things like banks where EV >>>> certificates are a must. >>>> >>>> DANE as a way to validate S/MIME I think will be a godsend to e-mail >>>> security, I hope clients implement it. >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> CentOS mailing list >>>> CentOS at centos.org >>>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >>> >>> _...

...s that git can provide over SVN for the preferred llvm > development workflow. You need to separate "what is good for Chris" from "what is good for the project" :-) Offline commits are useful for Chris when he is on a place without internet access. But offline commits are a godsend for people who still have no commit rights or for developers who are conducting a series of "what if" experiments. But whatever. Evaluating one feature at a time from our personal experiences or prejudices is wrong, wrong, wrong. What matters is the big picture and how it fits the whole...

I'm wondering what the longer term plans are for the C Backend. I understand it's not actively developed, even deprecated. What I'm not clear about is whether it's something that is viewed as non-vital and should just as well go away, or if it's just a low priority. Basically: it's not improving, but is it likely to disappear? Thanks, Kirk

On Nov 5, 2010, at 7:11 AM, Kirk Kelsey wrote: > I'm wondering what the longer term plans are for the C Backend. I understand it's not actively developed, even deprecated. What I'm not clear about is whether it's something that is viewed as non-vital and should just as well go away, or if it's just a low priority. Basically: it's not improving, but is it likely to

On Oct 22, 2012, at 10:15 AM, dag at cray.com wrote: > > It's true that a target-independent predicated IR isn't going to > translate well to a target that doesn't have predication. However, for > targets that do it's a godsend. Even for MIC (Xeon Phi), the predicated IR is not necessary. The instructions that really benefit from predication are loads and stores. MIC masks are write masks, but even if they were to help the performance of predicated instructions, there are other ways to do this. One way would be to imp...

...k the PKI system has way way way to many root certificates as it > is. I want a world where DANE validates most certificates, and only a > few root certificates are needed for things like banks where EV > certificates are a must. > > DANE as a way to validate S/MIME I think will be a godsend to e-mail > security, I hope clients implement it. > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

...root certificates as it >>> is. I want a world where DANE validates most certificates, and only a >>> few root certificates are needed for things like banks where EV >>> certificates are a must. >>> >>> DANE as a way to validate S/MIME I think will be a godsend to e-mail >>> security, I hope clients implement it. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> CentOS mailing list >>> CentOS at centos.org >>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >> >> _____________________________...

Hello folks!!! I'm happy, i do it! I've broadcast mpeg4 and i choose following method ffmpeg2theora -v 10 -a -1 -x 384 -y 256 /mnt/hdc/movie/godsend.avi -o /dev/stdout | oggfwd xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx 8899 hackme /video.ogg But ffmpeg2theora have very big CPU load average and if use source package of oggfwd and compile, oggfwd crashes with Segmentation fault, but if you download binary of oggfwd it works correct. Big thanks ALL! On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 0...