search for: gnugo

...2005-05-12-Int64ToFP: llc,jit Regressions MultiSource: Applications/d/make_dparser: llc, cbe, jit Applications/hexxagon/hexxagon: llc, cbe, jit Benchmarks/MallocBench/gs/gs: llc, cbe Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/cdecl/cdecl: llc, cbe, jit Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/football/football: cbe Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/gnugo/gnugo: llc, cbe, jit Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/agrep/agrep: llc Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/fixoutput/fixoutput: llc, cbe Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/gnugo/gnugo: llc, cbe, jit (looks like ld hung) Benchmarks/mediabench/gsm/toast/toast: llc Benchmarks/mediabench/jpeg/jpeg-6a/cjpeg: jit Benchmarks/mediabench/mpeg2/...

Tanya Lattner wrote: > >> 1. I'm still looking for volunteers to test MacOS X and Solaris. >> If you'd like to volunteer, please email the list to let us know. > > > I'll do minimal testing on Sparc. I'm not going to look into any > regressions though since no one has been really watching Sparc since I > graduated and I am sure there are

...Regressions MultiSource: > Applications/d/make_dparser: llc, cbe, jit > Applications/hexxagon/hexxagon: llc, cbe, jit > Benchmarks/MallocBench/gs/gs: llc, cbe > Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/cdecl/cdecl: llc, cbe, jit > Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/football/football: cbe > Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/gnugo/gnugo: llc, cbe, jit > Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/agrep/agrep: llc > Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/fixoutput/fixoutput: llc, cbe > Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/gnugo/gnugo: llc, cbe, jit (looks like ld hung) > Benchmarks/mediabench/gsm/toast/toast: llc > Benchmarks/mediabench/jpeg/jpeg-6a/cjpeg: jit &gt...

...: >> Applications/d/make_dparser: llc, cbe, jit >> Applications/hexxagon/hexxagon: llc, cbe, jit >> Benchmarks/MallocBench/gs/gs: llc, cbe >> Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/cdecl/cdecl: llc, cbe, jit >> Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/football/football: cbe >> Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/gnugo/gnugo: llc, cbe, jit >> Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/agrep/agrep: llc >> Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/fixoutput/fixoutput: llc, cbe >> Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/gnugo/gnugo: llc, cbe, jit (looks like ld hung) >> Benchmarks/mediabench/gsm/toast/toast: llc >> Benchmarks/mediabench/jpeg/jp...

...8241 0.0102 > SingleSource/UnitTests/ObjC++/property-reference.compile 7.39% 0.9252 0.9936 0.0064 > SingleSource/UnitTests/ObjC++/Hello.compile 7.33% 0.7822 0.8395 0.0015 > MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/dbms/dbms.compile 7.21% 1.1218 1.2027 0.0173 > MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/gnugo/gnugo.compile 6.93% 0.8243 0.8814 0.0106 > MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/office-ispell/office-ispell.compile 6.48% 1.7091 > 1.8199 0.0047 > MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/cfrac/cfrac.compile 6.45% 1.0109 1.0761 0.0116 > MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASCI_Purple/SMG2000/smg2000.compile 6.4...

...Output/office-ispell +1.2% SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++-EH/Output/spirit +1.4% SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/Output/oourafft +1.4% MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/assembler/Output/assembler +2.1% MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/unix-tbl/Output/unix-tbl +2.3% MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/gnugo/Output/gnugo +2.4% External/SPEC/CFP2000/179.art/Output/179.art +2.5% SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/Output/functionobjects +3.3% SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/Output/simple_types_constant_folding +3.3% External/SPEC/CINT2006/471.omnetpp/Output/471.omnetpp +7.1% MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolan...

...> SingleSource/UnitTests/ObjC++/property-reference.compile 7.39% 0.9252 0.9936 0.0064 >> SingleSource/UnitTests/ObjC++/Hello.compile 7.33% 0.7822 0.8395 0.0015 >> MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/dbms/dbms.compile 7.21% 1.1218 1.2027 0.0173 >> MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/gnugo/gnugo.compile 6.93% 0.8243 0.8814 0.0106 >> MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/office-ispell/office-ispell.compile 6.48% 1.7091 >> 1.8199 0.0047 >> MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/cfrac/cfrac.compile 6.45% 1.0109 1.0761 0.0116 >> MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASCI_Purple/SMG2000/smg...

No, seriously: I've had more than one person at work wonder what math toolset could be loaded onto iOS. So, before Matlab, FreeMat, Mathematia, SciLab, Octave, or numpy (:-) ) produces a version for iPad, any chance someone is working on R for iPad?

...p://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/LangRef.html#i_store The existing LLVM optimizations have been updated to honor volatile loads and stores. 7. Misha compiled a ton of random programs with LLVM and ran them with the X86 JIT (finding several bugs). This includes GNU coreutils, bison, ed, gawk, gnugo, xboard, nano, gnuchess, screen, grep, sed, etc. We, uhh, invested some time "testing" xboard (an X windows chess client) to make sure it worked properly. :) 8. Brian refactored the Interpreter and the JIT (collectively known as "execution engines") out of the LLI too...

...e/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/allroots/allroots | * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/assembler/assembler | * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/unix-tbl/unix-tbl | * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/gnugo/gnugo | * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/loader/loader | * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/unix-smail/unix-smail | * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/compiler/compiler...

...-2.1601016518424 Benchmarks/TSVC/ControlFlow-flt/ControlFlow 2.351 2.3012 -2.1182475542322 Benchmarks/MiBench/network-dijkstra/network 0.0296 0.029 -2.0270270270270 Benchmarks/Ptrdist/bc/bc 0.4764 0.4674 -1.8891687657430 Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/gnugo/gnugo 0.028 0.0275 -1.7857142857142 Benchmarks/VersaBench/dbms/dbms 0.8088 0.7949 -1.7185954500494 Benchmarks/ASC_Sequoia/CrystalMk/CrystalMk 3.7015 3.6379 -1.7182223422936 Benchmarks/Olden/health/health 0.1787 0.1757...

...* 0.05 | - - n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/football/football | 0.4918 97860 0.5812 * 0.0488 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.06 | - - n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/gnugo/gnugo | 0.2251 50244 0.2824 * 0.1260 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.14 | - - n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/loader/loader | 0.1275 32456 0.1768 * 0.1199...

...* 0.10 | - - n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/football/football | 0.6080 104088 0.9160 * 0.0600 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.08 | - - n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/gnugo/gnugo | 0.2760 51912 0.3640 * 0.1680 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.19 | - - n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/loader/loader | 0.1440 32264 0.2280 * 0.1440...

Andy and I briefly discussed this the other day, we have not yet got chance to list a detailed pass order for the pre- and post- IPO scalar optimizations. This is wish-list in our mind: pre-IPO: based on the ordering he propose, get rid of the inlining (or just inline tiny func), get rid of all loop xforms... post-IPO: get rid of inlining, or maybe we still need it, only

LLVMers, The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/ If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following: 1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release (default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both. 2) Run 'make check'. 3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'. 4) When

...* 0.08 | - - n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/football/football | 0.4132 105344 0.6047 * 0.0492 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.07 | - - n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/gnugo/gnugo | 0.1975 53024 0.2709 * 0.1200 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.14 | - - n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/loader/loader | 0.1207 33160 0.1680 * 0.1030...

...* 0.03 | - - n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/football/football | 0.2766 101836 0.3663 * 0.0242 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.03 | - - n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/gnugo/gnugo | 0.1633 52472 0.1853 * 0.0983 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.10 | - - n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/loader/loader | 0.0970 33560 0.1300 * 0.0705...

...0.002880781| 0.18| 35432240| 0| 0.00289412| -0.28| 35432240| 0| |MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/agrep/agrep.test | 551|0.001939458| 10466411|0.001957115| -0.9| 10466414| 0|0.001939551| 0| 10466414| 0| |MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/gnugo/gnugo.test | 409|0.021872206| 180503585|0.021904266| -0.15| 180503589| 0| 0.02196555| -0.42| 180503589| 0| |MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/anagram/anagram.test | 200|0.547015945| 3731701775|0.464701347| 17.71| 4461177826|-16.35| 0....

...04 | -       -       n/a          n/a > MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/football/football                      | > 0.3500 85712    0.5500      *                0.0400      |    0.00    0.00 >  0.01 *           0.05 | -       -       n/a          n/a > MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/gnugo/gnugo                            | > 0.1400 35692    0.2100      *                0.2200      |    0.07    0.07 >  0.07 *           0.30 | -       -       n/a          n/a > MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/loader/loader                          | > 0.0899 28276    0.1400      *      ...

Hi Tanya, > 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects > directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a > pre-compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself. I compiled llvm and llvm-gcc with separate objects directories. Platform is x86_64-linux-gnu. > 2) Run make check, report any failures (FAIL or unexpected pass). Note > that you need to