search for: gnawing

Hello! I would really appreciate any hints to a little puzzle that has been gnawing at me about remote sessions with ssh... (and likely all connectivity programs...) Because network connections can only talk in ASCII, there is no way to tell the difference between TAB and "Ctrl-i" (i.e. pressing Ctrl and i keys together). BOTH are transmitted as same ASCII code. Like...

...toint+arithmetic+inttoptr would still be legal? > > Yes, subject to constraints in the bullet point quoted at the > top of this email, which effectively just spelling out rules that > are already assumed today. Those rules are ok, I think. It's the computed-integer problem that is gnawing at me. I *think* the C standard says there can't be an alias and I assume the Fortran standard does as well. But even so, we all know that users often ignore standards when convenient. -Dave

...the whole thing)? Thanks! -- Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on Ubuntu 11.10 (oneiric) X 11.0.11004000 http://www.childpsy.net/ http://openvotingconsortium.org http://iris.org.il http://www.PetitionOnline.com/tap12009/ http://dhimmi.com Conscience is like a hamster: it is either asleep or gnawing.

Finally it''s here :) The Rails app to do battle with the likes of Miva Merchant and OS Commerce! I''m releasing Substruct 0.051 into the wild. More information here: http://dev.subimage.com/projects/substruct Please check it out! I''d love to hear all of your thoughts - and I''m looking for contributors! -- seth at subimage interactive

Hello learned ogg folks, and welcome to 2007. Sadly I am back at work already, and I'd like to seek your advice. We need to store raw RTP packets on disk as they are received from the network. There will be multiple streams of media--at least one audio and one video--that all need to go in the same file. We have decided to use ogg because it is the simplest container format that meets our

On Jul 22, 2009, at 12:33 PM, David Greene wrote: > On Wednesday 22 July 2009 13:30, Dan Gohman wrote: > > >> - A pointer value formed by a ptrtoint is associated with all >> address >> >> ranges of all pointer values that contribute (directly or >> >> indirectly) to the computation of the pointer's value. >> > > Do you mean

On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 03:47:38PM +1300, Andrew Donkin wrote: > My original plan was to store one RTP packet per ogg packet, one packet > per page, with the granule position of the page to the arrival time > of the RTP packet, and metadata in a custom format in the BOS packet. That's fine. SSRC as stream serialno? Note that by using arrival time as the granulepos you're making

http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc17.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc17.tar.gz.sig - MySQL authentication caused username to show up as "OK" in rc16. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: PGP.sig Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 186 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url :

http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc17.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc17.tar.gz.sig - MySQL authentication caused username to show up as "OK" in rc16. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: PGP.sig Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 186 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url :

Hi Something that''s gnawing at me... to avoid using the SQLite3 gem I''m stubbing it out like this: before(:each) do @database = mock("SQLite3 database") SQLite3 = Module.new SQLite3::Database = Class.new SQLite3::Database.stub!(:new).and_return(@database) end But t...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I''ve been unable to find anything definitive about what happens if I use RAID0 to join an SSD and HDD together with respect to performance (latency, throughput). The future is obvious (hot data tracking, using most appropriate device for the data, data migration). In my specific case I have a 250GB SSD and a 500GB HDD, and about 250GB of

Alright folks, after nearly a month of pounding and beating up the Mongrel 1.0 RC1 release we''re putting out the official 1.0.1 release. Read all about it at the (much funnier) news posting: http://mongrel.rubyforge.org/news.html For those people in a hurry, the gems should hit the mirrors and you can install using your usual commands. Refer the the above page for more help.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, this is a new attempt to improve the output of the command "btrfs fi df". The previous attempt received a good reception. However there was no a general consensus about the wording. Moreover I still didn''t understand how btrfs was using the disks. A my first attempt was to develop a new command which shows how the disks