search for: gmv

...We think is something with the vsz_limit parameter. How can we tune it? Thank you very much in advanced. Kind regards. ________________________________ [cid:image001.gif at 01CCE647.65B8FB30] H?ctor Moreno Blanco Divisi?n de Seguridad e Infraestructuras / Security and Infrastructures Division GMV Isaac Newton, 11 P.T.M. Tres Cantos E-28760 Madrid Tel. +34 91 807 21 00 Fax +34 91 807 21 99 www.gmv.com <http://www.gmv.com/> [cid:image002.gif at 01CCE647.65B8FB30]<http://www.gmv.com/b2_gmv> [cid:image003.gif at 01CCE647.65B8FB30]<http://www.facebook.com/infoGMV> [cid:im...

...e wiki of dovecot2 without success. Could anyone give us a clue please? If additional information is needed, please let me know. Thank you very much in advanced. Kind regards. ________________________________ [Descripci?n: C:\Documents and Settings\hhmb\Datos de programa\Microsoft\Firmas\logo_gmv.gif] H?ctor Moreno Blanco Divisi?n de Seguridad e Infraestructuras / Security and Infrastructures Division GMV Isaac Newton, 11 P.T.M. Tres Cantos E-28760 Madrid Tel. +34 91 807 21 00 Fax +34 91 807 21 99 www.gmv.com <http://www.gmv.com/> [Descripci?n: C:\Documents and Settings\hhmb\Datos d...

...ime only, and it seems that the pending function system inherently uses stubs. Anyway I'm sure my understanding will get fixed soon enough. :-) The new code is NOT commented. This patch was NOT attached to 2606. Rather I feel this patch is experimental in nature. As before I tried to use "GMV Mod" as comments to mark my modifications as long as they did not involve introducing new files. If one is interested and wants to use this patch, one should use the test cases found in 2606 and modify them in the following ways. 1) Add: #include "llvm/ExecutionEngine/CrossModuleJIT.h...

...ision) instead of Real*8. R works only with double precision and I got absurd results when calling the routine. Is it possible to make it work properly without changing the source code? I am running V0.64.1 of R for Unix. Thanks -------------------------- Carlos Corral van Damme GNSS Unit, GMV S.A. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Email: cfcorral at gmv.es Calle de Isaac Newton 11, PTM Tres Cantos, 28760 Madrid, SPAIN ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: cfcorral.vcf Type: tex...

Hello everyone, I've trying to configure shared folders in dovecot 2.1.6 without success. My configuration is: mail_plugins = quota autocreate mail_log notify acl ... plugin { ... acl_shared_dict = file:/etc/dovecot/shared-mailboxes.db ... } Protocol imap { ... mail_plugins = imap_quota imap_acl ... } When I try to set acl to a folder: a02 setacl inbox.test1 user1 lr a02 BAD Error

Dear all; I wish to create a graphic object combing an xyplot() and an mtext(). My code looks like following, gmv <- { trellis.device("windows", bg="white", width = 7, height = 7) xyplot(Mvol ~ Age | Nl * Th , data = Hft1, prepanel = function(x, y) prepanel.loess(x, y, span = 1), xlab =list(label = "Age (Years)", font = 2), ylab = &q...

...hat the pending function > system inherently uses stubs. Anyway > I'm sure my understanding will get fixed soon enough. :-) The new code is > NOT commented. > This patch was NOT attached to 2606. Rather I feel this patch > is experimental in nature. As before I tried to use "GMV Mod" > as comments to mark my modifications as long as they did not > involve introducing new files. If one is interested and wants > to use this patch, one should use the test cases found in  2606 and modify > them in the following ways. > 1) Add: #include "llvm/ExecutionE...

Please, any help with this issue. Thanks. H?ctor Moreno Blanco. -----Mensaje original----- De: dovecot-bounces+hmoreno=gmv.es at dovecot.org [mailto:dovecot-bounces+hmoreno=gmv.es at dovecot.org] En nombre de H?ctor Moreno Blanco Enviado el: mi?rcoles, 15 de diciembre de 2010 12:48 Para: dovecot at dovecot.org Asunto: [Dovecot] Quota ignore subfolders Hello, We have dovecot 2.0.8 in our servers with Scientific Linux...

...hat the pending function > system inherently uses stubs. Anyway > I'm sure my understanding will get fixed soon enough. :-) The new code is > NOT commented. > This patch was NOT attached to 2606. Rather I feel this patch > is experimental in nature. As before I tried to use "GMV Mod" > as comments to mark my modifications as long as they did not > involve introducing new files. If one is interested and wants > to use this patch, one should use the test cases found in  2606 and modify > them in the following ways. > 1) Add: #include "llvm/ExecutionE...

FROM:mailman-bounces at dovecot.org DATE:27. hein?kuuta 2012 16.58.35 UTC+3.00 TO:dovecot-owner at dovecot.org SUBJECT:CONTENT FILTERED MESSAGE NOTIFICATION The attached message matched the dovecot mailing list's content filtering rules and was prevented from being forwarded on to the list membership. ?You are receiving the only remaining copy of the discarded message. FROM:Asier Cidon

...a found "external" GlobalVariable. 2) To solve the foreign Module Function problem, I modified JIT.{h,cpp} to emit a stub for a found "external" Function instance, when that foreign Module defined Function has not yet been compiled. All areas of interest are marked with // GMV Mod: Again I invite those members of the list that have time, to review this proposal for comments/changes. Major mods: JIT.{h,cpp}: 1) I included Module.h. 2) JIT::getPointerToFunction(...) was modified to search for a non-mapped function in all "other" modules. If found a stub is...

...ternal" GlobalVariable. To solve the foreign Module Function problem, I modified both JIT.{h,cpp} and JITEmitter.cpp to emit a stub for a found "external" Function instance, when that foreign Module defined Function has not yet been compiled. All areas of interest are marked with // GMV Mod: As I've taken liberties with existing code, and thereby may have touched test cases that will fail, I would like to have those members of the list that have time, review this proposal for comments/changes. Major mods: JIT.{h,cpp}: 1) I included Module.h. 2) JIT::getPointerToFunction(....

...uot; GlobalVariable. > 2) To solve the foreign Module Function problem, > I modified JIT.{h,cpp} to emit a stub for a found "external" Function > instance, when that foreign Module > defined Function has not yet been compiled. > > All areas of interest are marked with // GMV Mod: > > Again I invite those members of the list that have time, to review this > proposal for comments/changes. > > Major mods: > > JIT.{h,cpp}: > > 1) I included Module.h. > > 2) JIT::getPointerToFunction(...) was modified to search for a non-mapped > function...

Dear friends. Is there any way to ignore the error produced when the function scan(file="...") cannot open the file (due to, e.g., the file does not exist)? I am also very interested in ways to label a contour plot. Yours. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/19990818/6b89481a/attachment.html

...le. > To solve the foreign Module Function problem, I modified both JIT.{h,cpp} and JITEmitter.cpp to emit > a stub for a found "external" Function instance, when that foreign Module defined Function has not > yet been compiled. > > All areas of interest are marked with // GMV Mod: > > As I've taken liberties with existing code, and thereby may have touched test cases that will fail, I would like > to have those members of the list that have time, review this proposal for comments/changes. > [snip] > Thanks for any time spent on this > > Gar...

On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 4:52 AM, Garrison Venn <gvenn.cfe.dev at gmail.com> wrote: > I do have one question though. After having done the fix and the appropriate unit tests, > does one still need to add to the tests suite for the testing bots, and add to test for make > check (for this kind of bug fix)? Do the unittests somehow get invoked by make check? I > guess I don't

...To solve the foreign Module Function problem, I modified both JIT.{h,cpp} > and JITEmitter.cpp to emit > a stub for a found "external" Function instance, when that foreign Module > defined Function has not > yet been compiled. > > All areas of interest are marked with // GMV Mod: > > As I've taken liberties with existing code, and thereby may have touched > test cases that will fail, I would like > to have those members of the list that have time, review this proposal for > comments/changes. > > Major mods: > > JIT.{h,cpp}: > > 1) I...

...tion >> system inherently uses stubs. Anyway >> I'm sure my understanding will get fixed soon enough. :-) The new code is >> NOT commented. >> This patch was NOT attached to 2606. Rather I feel this patch >> is experimental in nature. As before I tried to use "GMV Mod" >> as comments to mark my modifications as long as they did not >> involve introducing new files. If one is interested and wants >> to use this patch, one should use the test cases found in 2606 and modify >> them in the following ways. >> 1) Add: #include &...

...e the foreign Module Function problem, I modified both JIT.{h,cpp} and JITEmitter.cpp to emit >> a stub for a found "external" Function instance, when that foreign Module defined Function has not >> yet been compiled. >> >> All areas of interest are marked with // GMV Mod: >> >> As I've taken liberties with existing code, and thereby may have touched test cases that will fail, I would like >> to have those members of the list that have time, review this proposal for comments/changes. >> > > [snip] > >> Thanks for an...

...ot; GlobalVariable. > 2) To solve the foreign Module Function problem, > I modified JIT.{h,cpp} to emit a stub for a found "external" Function instance, when that foreign Module > defined Function has not yet been compiled. > > All areas of interest are marked with // GMV Mod: > > Again I invite those members of the list that have time, to review this proposal for comments/changes. > > Major mods: > > JIT.{h,cpp}: > > 1) I included Module.h. > > 2) JIT::getPointerToFunction(...) was modified to search for a non-mapped function in a...