Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "gmux_detect".
Did you mean:
gmux_detected
2015 Jan 17
0
[PATCH RFC] nouveau: Add support for Gmux _DSM method
...U_DSM_OPTIMUS_FLAGS_CHANGED)
+#define NOUVEAU_DSM_GMUX_UNK7 0x7
+
/* result of the optimus caps function */
#define OPTIMUS_ENABLED (1 << 0)
#define OPTIMUS_STATUS_MASK (3 << 3)
@@ -45,6 +47,7 @@
static struct nouveau_dsm_priv {
bool dsm_detected;
bool optimus_detected;
+ bool gmux_detected;
acpi_handle dhandle;
acpi_handle rom_handle;
} nouveau_dsm_priv;
@@ -57,8 +60,13 @@ bool nouveau_is_v1_dsm(void) {
return nouveau_dsm_priv.dsm_detected;
}
-#define NOUVEAU_DSM_HAS_MUX 0x1
-#define NOUVEAU_DSM_HAS_OPT 0x2
+bool nouveau_has_gmux_dsm(void) {
+ return nouveau_dsm_priv.gmux...
2015 May 25
15
[PATCH 1/8] acpi: Rename v1 DSM to mux to avoid ambiguity
This is especially true when variables or functions are just called dsm without
precising the v1.
Signed-off-by: Pierre Moreau <pierre.morrow at free.fr>
---
drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.h | 4 +--
drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c | 4 +--
drm/nouveau/nouveau_vga.c | 10 ++++----
4 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 41
2015 May 28
12
[PATCH v2 1/9] acpi: Rename v1 DSM to mux to avoid ambiguity
This is especially true when variables or functions are just called dsm without
specifying the v1.
Changes since v1:
* Fix typo in commit explanation
* Change has_dsm to has_mux in nouveau_dsm_detect
Signed-off-by: Pierre Moreau <pierre.morrow at free.fr>
---
drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.h | 4 +--