search for: gmessmer

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "gmessmer".

Did you mean: messmer
2006 Feb 14
1
domain member with LDAP nss
...SS info currently comes from ldap, and the PDC is another samba 3 host. The PDC is also using the ldap server for its data. I'm not clear on how winbind is used in this configuration. When I look at the owner/group of files from a Windows workstation, I see names of the form "MYHOST\gmessmer" rather than "MYDOMAIN\gmessmer". I presume that this is so because samba can map my domain login (MYDOMAIN\gmessmer) to the unix user "gmessmer", but can't do the reverse without winbind. What is the minimum amount of configuration needed to provide this reverse...
2016 Apr 07
5
Suddenly increased my hard disk
Hi John, Am currently running dos mode not graphical mode. Could you have any other method. Hi Ashish, You are correct. qmailtoaster backup file which was around 184 GB in backup.gz type and i have removed .bz2 type file with the same backup/mailbkup directory. After removed .bz2 file it's gone backup.gz also which was 184 GB file. I have run this command locate .gz but couldn't find out
2016 Apr 07
0
Suddenly increased my hard disk
...ied the culprit. The backup file consumed your space, and some process still has it open so that it's not being freed on the filesystem. As root, look for deleted files: # ls -l /proc/*/fd/* | grep '(deleted)' For instance, among the output on my system, I see this: l-wx------. 1 gmessmer gmessmer 64 Apr 7 09:41 /proc/28087/fd/1 -> /home/gmessmer/tmp.1 (deleted) The file /proc/28087/fd/1 appears as a symlink to a deleted file. In that case, the process with PID 28087 has the file open. I can use "ps" to determine what the process is, and terminate it appropriately...
2016 Apr 18
2
Suddenly increased my hard disk
...med your space, and some process still has it open so > that it's not being freed on the filesystem. > > As root, look for deleted files: > > # ls -l /proc/*/fd/* | grep '(deleted)' > > For instance, among the output on my system, I see this: > > l-wx------. 1 gmessmer gmessmer 64 Apr 7 09:41 /proc/28087/fd/1 -> > /home/gmessmer/tmp.1 (deleted) > > The file /proc/28087/fd/1 appears as a symlink to a deleted file. In that > case, the process with PID 28087 has the file open. I can use "ps" to > determine what the process is, and termi...
2015 Apr 24
1
Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts
On 04/24/2015 09:59 AM, Steve Lindemann wrote: > > A script with no shebang will run in the environment of the account > running the script. Bad test on my part, apparently. $ python >>> import os >>> os.execv('/home/gmessmer/test', ('test',)) Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> OSError: [Errno 8] Exec format error So a script with no shebang will fail when the shell calls exec(). If that's so, then starting the executable script with an inte...
2015 Apr 24
9
Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts
On 04/24/2015 03:57 AM, Pete Geenhuizen wrote: > if you leave it out the script will run in whatever environment it > currently is in. I'm reasonably certain that a script with no shebang will run with /bin/sh. I interpret your statement to mean that if a user is using ksh and enters the path to such a script, it would also run in ksh. That would only be true if you