search for: gm20b_secboot_new

...(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/gm20b.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/gm20b.c index df8b919dcf09..ace6fefba428 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/gm20b.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/gm20b.c @@ -108,6 +108,7 @@ gm20b_secboot_new(struct nvkm_device *device, int index, struct gm200_secboot *gsb; struct nvkm_acr *acr; + *psb = NULL; acr = acr_r352_new(BIT(NVKM_SECBOOT_FALCON_FECS) | BIT(NVKM_SECBOOT_FALCON_PMU)); if (IS_ERR(acr)) @@ -116,10 +117,8 @@ gm20b_secboot_new(struct nvkm_device *device, int index,...

...) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/gm20b.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/gm20b.c index df8b919dcf09b..ace6fefba4280 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/gm20b.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/gm20b.c @@ -108,6 +108,7 @@ gm20b_secboot_new(struct nvkm_device *device, int index, struct gm200_secboot *gsb; struct nvkm_acr *acr; + *psb = NULL; acr = acr_r352_new(BIT(NVKM_SECBOOT_FALCON_FECS) | BIT(NVKM_SECBOOT_FALCON_PMU)); if (IS_ERR(acr)) @@ -116,10 +117,8 @@ gm20b_secboot_new(struct nvkm_device *device, int index,...

...) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/gm20b.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/gm20b.c index df8b919dcf09b..ace6fefba4280 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/gm20b.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/gm20b.c @@ -108,6 +108,7 @@ gm20b_secboot_new(struct nvkm_device *device, int index, struct gm200_secboot *gsb; struct nvkm_acr *acr; + *psb = NULL; acr = acr_r352_new(BIT(NVKM_SECBOOT_FALCON_FECS) | BIT(NVKM_SECBOOT_FALCON_PMU)); if (IS_ERR(acr)) @@ -116,10 +117,8 @@ gm20b_secboot_new(struct nvkm_device *device, int index,...

...) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/gm20b.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/gm20b.c index df8b919dcf09b..ace6fefba4280 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/gm20b.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/gm20b.c @@ -108,6 +108,7 @@ gm20b_secboot_new(struct nvkm_device *device, int index, struct gm200_secboot *gsb; struct nvkm_acr *acr; + *psb = NULL; acr = acr_r352_new(BIT(NVKM_SECBOOT_FALCON_FECS) | BIT(NVKM_SECBOOT_FALCON_PMU)); if (IS_ERR(acr)) @@ -116,10 +117,8 @@ gm20b_secboot_new(struct nvkm_device *device, int index,...

...) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/gm20b.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/gm20b.c index 30491d132d59c..fbd10a67c6c6a 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/gm20b.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/gm20b.c @@ -108,6 +108,7 @@ gm20b_secboot_new(struct nvkm_device *device, int index, struct gm200_secboot *gsb; struct nvkm_acr *acr; + *psb = NULL; acr = acr_r352_new(BIT(NVKM_SECBOOT_FALCON_FECS) | BIT(NVKM_SECBOOT_FALCON_PMU)); if (IS_ERR(acr)) @@ -116,10 +117,8 @@ gm20b_secboot_new(struct nvkm_device *device, int index,...

Hello Alexandre Courbot, The patch 923f1bd27bf1: "drm/nouveau/secboot/gm20b: add secure boot support" from Feb 24, 2016, leads to the following static checker warning: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/gm20b.c:129 gm20b_secboot_new() warn: did you mean to set '*psb' instead of 'psb' drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/gm20b.c 103 int 104 gm20b_secboot_new(struct nvkm_device *device, int index, 105 struct nvkm_secboot **psb) 106 { 107 int ret; 108...

...(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/gm20b.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/gm20b.c index 30491d132d59..df8b919dcf09 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/gm20b.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/gm20b.c @@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ gm20b_secboot_new(struct nvkm_device *device, int index, return 0; } +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_210_SOC) MODULE_FIRMWARE("nvidia/gm20b/acr/bl.bin"); MODULE_FIRMWARE("nvidia/gm20b/acr/ucode_load.bin"); MODULE_FIRMWARE("nvidia/gm20b/gr/fecs_bl.bin"); @@ -144,3 +145,4 @@ MOD...

...uveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/gm20b.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/gm20b.c >> index 30491d132d59..df8b919dcf09 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/gm20b.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/gm20b.c >> @@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ gm20b_secboot_new(struct nvkm_device *device, int index, >> return 0; >> } >> >> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_210_SOC) >> MODULE_FIRMWARE("nvidia/gm20b/acr/bl.bin"); >> MODULE_FIRMWARE("nvidia/gm20b/acr/ucode_load.bin"); >> MODULE_FIRMWARE(...

...ivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/gm20b.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/gm20b.c > index 30491d132d59..df8b919dcf09 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/gm20b.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/gm20b.c > @@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ gm20b_secboot_new(struct nvkm_device *device, int index, > return 0; > } > > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_210_SOC) > MODULE_FIRMWARE("nvidia/gm20b/acr/bl.bin"); > MODULE_FIRMWARE("nvidia/gm20b/acr/ucode_load.bin"); > MODULE_FIRMWARE("nvidia/gm20b/gr/fecs_bl....

....boot_falcon = NVKM_FALCON_PMU, }; +static const secboot_ls_func +gm20b_ls_func = { + [NVKM_FALCON_FECS] = &(struct secboot_ls_single_func) { + .load = gm200_ls_load_fecs, + .generate_bl_desc = gm20b_secboot_ls_bl_desc, + .bl_desc_size = sizeof(struct gm20b_flcn_bl_desc), + }, +}; + int gm20b_secboot_new(struct nvkm_device *device, int index, struct nvkm_secboot **psb) @@ -204,6 +232,7 @@ gm20b_secboot_new(struct nvkm_device *device, int index, return ret; gsb->func = &gm20b_secboot_func; + gsb->ls_func = &gm20b_ls_func; return 0; } diff --git a/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subde...

This was the first step of the secure boot refactoring - as Ben asked for some fixes, I now submit it as its own series to make it easier to review (and also because rebasing secure boot on top of this takes time and I don't want to do it until this is validated!). This series attempts to factorize the duplicate falcon-related code into a single library, using the existing nvkm_falcon

This is a highly changed revision of the first patch series that adds secure boot support to Nouveau. This code still depends on NVIDIA releasing official firmware files, but the files released with SHIELD TV and Pixel C can already be used on a Jetson TX1. As you know we are working hard to release the official firmware files, however in the meantime it doesn't hurt to review the code so it

New version of the secure boot code that works with the blobs just merged into linux-firmware. Since the required Mesa patches are also merged, this set is the last piece of the puzzle to get out-of-the-box accelerated Maxwell 2. The basic code remains the same, with a few improvements with respect to how secure falcons are started. Hopefully the patchset is better split too. I have a

GP10B is the chip used in Tegra X2 SoCs. This patchset adds support for its base engines after reworking secboot a bit to accomodate its calling convention better. This patchset has been tested rendering simple off-screen buffers using Mesa and yielded the expected result. Alexandre Courbot (15): secboot: allow to boot multiple falcons secboot: pass instance to LS firmware loaders secboot:

This revision includes initial signed PMU firmware support for GM20B (Tegra X1). This PMU code will also be used as a basis for dGPU signed PMU firmware support. With the PMU code, the refactoring of secure boot should also make more sense. ACR (secure boot) support is now separated by the driver version it originates from. This separation allows to run any version of the ACR on any chip,

This is a rework of the secure boot code that moves the building of the blob into its own set of source files (and own hooks), making the code more flexible and (hopefully) easier to understand as well. This rework is needed to support more signed firmware for existing and new chips. Since the firmwares in question are not available yet I cannot send the code to manage then, but hopefully the

This is a rework of the secure boot code that moves the building of the blob into its own set of source files (and own hooks), making the code more flexible and (hopefully) easier to understand as well. This rework is needed to support more signed firmware for existing and new chips. Since the firmwares in question are not available yet I cannot send the code to manage then, but hopefully the

Sending things in a smaller chunks since it makes their reviewing easier. This part part 2/3 of the secboot refactoring/PMU command support patch series. Part 1 was the new falcon library which should be merged soon now. This series is mainly a refactoring/sanitization of the existing secure boot code. It does not add new features (part 3 will). Secure boot handling is now separated by NVIDIA

This series does some refactoring in the GK20A's volt and clk drivers (fixing a few things while we are at it) to let GM20B benefit from the GK20A's logic with which it is compatible. GM20B is capable of more sophisticated (and power-efficient) reclocking which will follow later. Even after this more fancy reclocking is merged, the present logic will remain used in the lowest speedo of

Hi everyone, Apologies for the big patchset. This is a rework of the secure boot code that moves the building of the blob into its own set of source files (and own hooks), making the code more flexible and (hopefully) easier to understand as well. This rework is needed to support more signed firmware for existing and new chips. Since the firmwares in question are not available yet I cannot send