search for: gluter

... or in other words - can samba break (on Centos 7.3) if one goes with gluster version to high? hi fellas. I wonder because I see: smbd[4088153]: Unknown gluster ACL version: -847736808 smbd[4088153]: [2017/07/27 13:12:54.047332, 0] ../source3/modules/vfs_glusterfs.c:1365(gluster_to_smb_acl) smbd[4088153]: Unknown gluster ACL version: 0 smbd[4088153]: [2017/07/27 13:12:54.162658, 0]

On 27/07/17 14:13, lejeczek wrote: > ... or in other words - can samba break (on Centos 7.3) if > one goes with gluster version to high? > > hi fellas. > > I wonder because I see: > > smbd[4088153]: Unknown gluster ACL version: -847736808 > smbd[4088153]: [2017/07/27 13:12:54.047332, 0] > ../source3/modules/vfs_glusterfs.c:1365(gluster_to_smb_acl) >

Hi All, I have created a distributed volume on one server which is also a DHCP server I am booting another blade which gets its kernel image from the DHCP server via the NFS mount which is a gluter distributed volumed This volume is successfully getting NFS mounted on the client side, I can even do cd to the directories contained in the NFS mount, touch, cat and cp operations on a file in the NFS mount, but when I give ls command on the NFS mount, it gives "input/error " on the...

...kers equally busy - Github Label check is now enforced: - Need help from others to identify the needs for going to give the flag. - As ?ndevos? asked, we need to highlight this in Developer Guide and other places in documentation. - Can we fix the ?gluter spec? format and ask people to fill the github issues in that format? So that it becomes easier to give the flags. - [Handled Already]Regression failures - trash.t and nfs-mount-auth.t are failing frequently - git bisect shows https://review.gluster.org/19837 as possible...

...with the > recommended 3 node setup to avoid this which would include a proper > quorum?? Or is there more to this and it really doesn't matter if I have > a 2 node gluster cluster without a quorum and this is due to something > else still? > > Again, anytime I check the gluter volumes, everything checks out.? The > results of both 'gluster volume info' and 'gluster volume status' is > always as I pasted above, fully working. > > I'm also using the Linux KDC Free IPA with this solution as well. >

...need to do here? Should I go with the recommended 3 node setup to avoid this which would include a proper quorum? Or is there more to this and it really doesn't matter if I have a 2 node gluster cluster without a quorum and this is due to something else still? Again, anytime I check the gluter volumes, everything checks out. The results of both 'gluster volume info' and 'gluster volume status' is always as I pasted above, fully working. I'm also using the Linux KDC Free IPA with this solution as well. -- Cheers, Tom K. -------------------------------------------...

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 4:35 AM, TomK <tomkcpr at mdevsys.com> wrote: > On 4/9/2018 2:45 AM, Alex K wrote: > Hey Alex, > > With two nodes, the setup works but both sides go down when one node is > missing. Still I set the below two params to none and that solved my issue: > > cluster.quorum-type: none > cluster.server-quorum-type: none > > yes this disables

On 4/9/2018 2:45 AM, Alex K wrote: Hey Alex, With two nodes, the setup works but both sides go down when one node is missing. Still I set the below two params to none and that solved my issue: cluster.quorum-type: none cluster.server-quorum-type: none Thank you for that. Cheers, Tom > Hi, > > You need 3 nodes at least to have quorum enabled. In 2 node setup you > need to