search for: glustervolum

...he time of the failures We?ve searched the inter web but can not find anyone else having the same problem in mid flight The clients have four mounts of volumes from the same server, all mounts fail simultaneously Peer status looks ok Volume status looks ok Volume info looks like this: Volume Name: GLUSTERVOLUME Type: Replicate Volume ID: ca7af017-4f0f-44cc-baf6-43168eed0748 Status: Started Snapshot Count: 0 Number of Bricks: 1 x 2 = 2 Transport-type: tcp Bricks: Brick1: GLUSTERSERVER1:/gluster/GLUSTERVOLUME/brick Brick2: GLUSTERSERVER2:/gluster/GLUSTERVOLUME/brick Options Reconfigured: transport.address-...

Hello GlusterFS users, can anybody give me please his opinion about the following facts and questions: 4 storage server with 16 SATA bays, connected by GigE: Q1: Volume will be set up as distributed-replicated. Maildir, FTP Dir, htdocs, file store directory => as sub dir's in one big GlusterVolume or each dir in it's own GlusterVolume? Q2: Set up the bricks as a collection of JBOD's or underlay it with a RAID-5 array? Q3: A client mounted the GlusterFS from a nfs export of node 1. What if the server is down - would be a set up with virtual IP triggered by heartbeat a solution to p...

...for the first time and have the following problem: I want to have two nodes. On node1 I have a raid1-sytem running in /raid/storage Both nodes see the other and now I try to create a volume. While I create the first volume on a fresh system (node1) for the first time, gluster said: volume create: glustervolume: failed: /raid/storage/ or a prefix of it is already part of a volume How can it be? It is possible, that the mdadm-raid1-sytem is the reason? Regards, Tito

Hi, I run a proxmox system with a glustervolume over three nodes. I think about setup a second volume, but want to use the other interfaces on the nodes. Is this recommended or possible? Bye Gregor

..._reduced_name) ? check_reduced_name: check_reduced_name [hildner/.config/menus] [/data/ho] [2019/08/23 11:29:56.944070, 10, pid=1246, effective(101776, 513), real(101776, 0), class=vfs] ../source3/smbd/vfs.c:1260(check_reduced_name) ? check_reduced_name realpath [<user>/.config/menus] -> [/glustervolume/<user>/.config/menus] [2019/08/23 11:29:56.944092,? 5, pid=1246, effective(101776, 513), real(101776, 0), class=vfs] ../source3/smbd/vfs.c:1371(check_reduced_name) ? check_reduced_name: <user>/.config/menus reduced to /glustervolume/<user>/.config/menus [2019/08/23 11:29:56.94411...

...unning NFS directly from zfs pool gives me a far better performance. 4. Tried various performance related options for glusterfs, but with only small performance increase (( 5. Clients perform horribly when additing new bricks to the cluser. By that I mean over 2 hours to run "time ls -lhR /glustervolume" which contains just 10 files. Basically, mounted fs is completely unusable during this time! 6. Virtual machines with volumes stored on the glusterfs mounted filesystem have an extremely slow performance. I've not managed to get speeds over 50MB/s using cache=none option. If any of y...

Hi, I run a proxmox system with a glustervolume over three nodes. I think about setup a second volume, but want to use the other interfaces on the nodes. Is this recommended or possible? Bye Gregor

Hi, I have a ctdb cluster with 3 nodes and 3 glusterfs (version 6) nodes up and running. I observe plenty of these situations: A connected Windows-10 client doesn't react anymore. I use forder redirections.? - Smbstatus shows up some (auth in progress) processes. - In the logs of a ctdb node I get: Aug 23 10:12:29 ctdb-1 ctdbd[2167]: Ending traverse on DB locking.tdb (id 568831), records

...arate disk) Volume Name: d1 Type: Replicate Status: Started Number of Bricks: 4 Transport-type: tcp Bricks: Brick1: glusterdev:/b1 Brick2: glusterdev:/b2 Brick3: glusterdev:/b3 Brick4: glusterdev:/b4 Options Reconfigured: diagnostics.brick-log-level: DEBUG diagnostics.client-log-level: DEBUG * My glustervolume is mountet as glusterfs on /d1 glusterdev:/d1 52403200 33024 52370176 1% /d1 1) I put a file on the glusterfs date >/d1/data.txt 2) Checking the storage on the bricks: ls -l /b1 /b2 /b3 /b4 /b1: total 8 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 29 Feb 5 21:40 data.txt /b2: total 8 -rw-r--r--...

...he time of the failures We?ve searched the inter web but can not find anyone else having the same problem in mid flight The clients have four mounts of volumes from the same server, all mounts fail simultaneously Peer status looks ok Volume status looks ok Volume info looks like this: Volume Name: GLUSTERVOLUME Type: Replicate Volume ID: ca7af017-4f0f-44cc-baf6-43168eed0748 Status: Started Snapshot Count: 0 Number of Bricks: 1 x 2 = 2 Transport-type: tcp Bricks: Brick1: GLUSTERSERVER1:/gluster/GLUSTERVOLUME/brick Brick2: GLUSTERSERVER2:/gluster/GLUSTERVOLUME/brick Options Reconfigured: transport.address-...

...he time of the failures We?ve searched the inter web but can not find anyone else having the same problem in mid flight The clients have four mounts of volumes from the same server, all mounts fail simultaneously Peer status looks ok Volume status looks ok Volume info looks like this: Volume Name: GLUSTERVOLUME Type: Replicate Volume ID: ca7af017-4f0f-44cc-baf6-43168eed0748 Status: Started Snapshot Count: 0 Number of Bricks: 1 x 2 = 2 Transport-type: tcp Bricks: Brick1: GLUSTERSERVER1:/gluster/GLUSTERVOLUME/brick Brick2: GLUSTERSERVER2:/gluster/GLUSTERVOLUME/brick Options Reconfigured: transport.address-...

...searched the inter web but can not find anyone else having the same problem in mid flight > > The clients have four mounts of volumes from the same server, all mounts fail simultaneously > Peer status looks ok > Volume status looks ok > Volume info looks like this: > Volume Name: GLUSTERVOLUME > Type: Replicate > Volume ID: ca7af017-4f0f-44cc-baf6-43168eed0748 > Status: Started > Snapshot Count: 0 > Number of Bricks: 1 x 2 = 2 > Transport-type: tcp > Bricks: > Brick1: GLUSTERSERVER1:/gluster/GLUSTERVOLUME/brick > Brick2: GLUSTERSERVER2:/gluster/GLUSTERVOLUME/b...