search for: glusterds

Hi again, I'm having trouble testing the add-brick feature. I'm using a replicate 2 setup with currently 2 nodes in and am trying to add 2 more. The command blocks for a bit until i get an "Add Brick unsuccessful" message. According to etc-glusterfs-glusterd.vol.log below i can't seem to find anything : [2011-04-20 12:55:06.944593] I

Hi, I have a problem joining four Gluster 3.10 nodes to an existing Gluster 3.8 nodes. My understanding that this should work and not be too much of a problem. Peer robe is successful but the node is rejected: gluster> peer detach elkpinfglt07 peer detach: success gluster> peer probe elkpinfglt07 peer probe: success. gluster> peer status Number of Peers: 6 Hostname: elkpinfglt02

Hello, i installed glusterfs 3.11.3 version 3 nodes ubuntu 16.04 machine. All machines have same /etc/hosts. node1 hostname pri.ostechnix.lan node2 hostname sec.ostechnix.lan node2 hostname third.ostechnix.lan 51.15.77.14 pri.ostechnix.lan pri 51.15.90.60 sec.ostechnix.lan sec 163.172.151.120 third.ostechnix.lan third volume create command is root at

All, I currently have 2 bricks running Gluster 3.10.1. This is a Centos installation. On Friday last week, I enabled the trashcan feature on one of my volumes: gluster volume set date01 features.trash on I also limited the max file size to 500MB: gluster volume set data01 features.trash-max-filesize 500MB 3 hours after that I enabled this, this specific gluster volume went down: [2017-06-16

On 8/02/2018 4:45 AM, Gaurav Yadav wrote: > After seeing command history, I could see that you have 3 nodes, and > firstly you are peer probing 51.15.90.60? and 163.172.151.120 from? > 51.15.77.14 > So here itself you have 3 node cluster, after all this you are going > on node 2 and again peer probing 51.15.77.14. > ?Ideally it should work, with above steps, but due to some

I'm guessing there's something wrong w.r.t address resolution on node 1. >From the logs it's quite clear to me that node 1 is unable to resolve the address configured in /etc/hosts where as the other nodes do. Could you paste the gluster peer status output from all the nodes? Also can you please check if you're able to ping "pri.ostechnix.lan" from node1 only? Does

Hi all, our systems have suffered a host failure in a replica three setup. The host needed a complete reinstall. I followed the RH guide to 'replace a host with the same hostname' (https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_gluster_storage/3/html/administration_guide/sect-replacing_hosts). The machine has the same OS (CentOS 7). The new machine got a minor version number newer

On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 1:55 AM, Ziemowit Pierzycki <ziemowit at pierzycki.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I have a problem joining four Gluster 3.10 nodes to an existing > Gluster 3.8 nodes. My understanding that this should work and not be > too much of a problem. > > Peer robe is successful but the node is rejected: > > gluster> peer detach elkpinfglt07 > peer

Hi,we have use glusterfs for two years. After upgraded to 3.2.5,we discover that when one of replicate node reboot and startup the glusterd daemon,the gluster will crash cause by the other replicate node cpu usage reach 100%. Our gluster info: Type: Distributed-Replicate Status: Started Number of Bricks: 5 x 2 = 10 Transport-type: tcp Options Reconfigured: performance.cache-size: 3GB

On Tue, 2017-06-20 at 08:52 -0400, Ludwig Gamache wrote: > All, > > I currently have 2 bricks running Gluster 3.10.1. This is a Centos installation. On Friday last > week, I enabled the trashcan feature on one of my volumes: > gluster volume set date01 features.trash on I think you misspelled the volume name. Is it data01 or date01? > I also limited the max file size to 500MB:

Could you share the following information: 1. gluster --version 2. output of gluster volume status 3. glusterd log and all brick log files from the node where bricks didn't come up. On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 12:35 PM, Richard Neuboeck <hawk at tbi.univie.ac.at> wrote: > Hi all, > > our systems have suffered a host failure in a replica three setup. > The host needed a

Did you do gluster peer probe? Check out the documentation: http://docs.gluster.org/en/latest/Administrator%20Guide/Storage%20Pools/ On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 5:01 PM, Ercan Aydo?an <ercan.aydogan at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > i installed glusterfs 3.11.3 version 3 nodes ubuntu 16.04 machine. All > machines have same /etc/hosts. > > node1 hostname > pri.ostechnix.lan

Hi list, recently I've noted a strange behaviour of my gluster storage, sometimes while executing a simple command like "gluster volume status vm-images-repo" as a response I got "Another transaction is in progress for vm-images-repo. Please try again after sometime.". This situation does not get solved simply waiting for but I've to restart glusterd on the node that

Hi all, our systems have suffered a node failure in a replica three setup. The node needed a complete reinstall. I followed the RH guide to replace a host with the same hostname (https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_gluster_storage/3/html/administration_guide/sect-replacing_hosts). The machine has the same OS (CentOS 7). The new machine got a minor version number newer gluster

Hi Team, I noticed that glusterd is never starting when i reboot my Redhat 7.1 server. Service is enabled but don't works. I tested with gluster 3.10.4 & gluster 3.10.5 and the problem still exists. When i started the service manually this works. I'va also tested on Redhat 6.6 server and gluster 3.10.4 and this works fine. The problem seems to be related to Redhat 7.1 This is

Hi, we'd like to use glusterfs for Proxmox and virtual machines with qcow2 disk images. We have a three node glusterfs setup with one volume and Proxmox is attached and VMs are created, but after some time, and I think after much i/o is going on for a VM, the data inside the virtual machine gets corrupted. When I copy files from or to our glusterfs directly everything is OK, I've

Hello, So I'm seeing a rejected peer with 3.12.6. This is with a replica 3 volume. It actually began as the same problem with a different peer. I noticed with (call it) gluster-2, when I couldn't make a new volume. I compared /var/lib/glusterd between them, and found that somehow the options in one of the vols differed. (I suspect this was due to attempting to create the volume via the

In attachment the requested logs for all the three nodes. thanks, Paolo Il 20/07/2017 11:38, Atin Mukherjee ha scritto: > Please share the cmd_history.log file from all the storage nodes. > > On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Paolo Margara > <paolo.margara at polito.it <mailto:paolo.margara at polito.it>> wrote: > > Hi list, > > recently I've

I changed /etc/hosts 127.0.0.1 pri.ostechnix.lan pri 51.15.90.60 sec.ostechnix.lan sec 163.172.151.120 third.ostechnix.lan third on every node matching hostname to 127.0.0.1 then root at pri:~# apt-get purge glusterfs-server root at pri:~# rm -rf /var/lib/glusterd/ root at pri:~# rm -rf /var/log/glusterfs/ root at pri:~# apt-get install glusterfs-server root at pri:~#

You're hitting a race here. By the time glusterd tries to resolve the address of one of the remote bricks of a particular volume, the n/w interface is not up by that time. We have fixed this issue in mainline and 3.12 branch through the following commit: commit 1477fa442a733d7b1a5ea74884cac8f29fbe7e6a Author: Gaurav Yadav <gyadav at redhat.com> Date: Tue Jul 18 16:23:18 2017 +0530