search for: gluster_dirperf_vault2017_0

All, A github issue on this (tracking mostly DHT stuff) at: https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/117 Slides of the talk on the same topic presented at Vault 2017: https://events.static.linuxfound.org/sites/events/files/slides/Gluster_DirPerf_Vault2017_0.pdf regards, Raghavendra

can you please test parallel-readdir or readdir-ahead gives disconnects? so we know which to disable parallel-readdir doing magic ran on pdf from last year https://events.static.linuxfound.org/sites/events/files/slides/Gluster_DirPerf_Vault2017_0.pdf -v On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 8:20 AM, Alan Orth <alan.orth at gmail.com> wrote: > By the way, on a slightly related note, I'm pretty sure either > parallel-readdir or readdir-ahead has a regression in GlusterFS 3.12.x. We > are running CentOS 7 with kernel-3.10.0-693.11.6.el7...

...Vlad Kopylov <vladkopy at gmail.com> wrote: > can you please test parallel-readdir or readdir-ahead gives > disconnects? so we know which to disable > > parallel-readdir doing magic ran on pdf from last year > > https://events.static.linuxfound.org/sites/events/files/slides/Gluster_DirPerf_Vault2017_0.pdf > > -v > > On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 8:20 AM, Alan Orth <alan.orth at gmail.com> wrote: > > By the way, on a slightly related note, I'm pretty sure either > > parallel-readdir or readdir-ahead has a regression in GlusterFS 3.12.x. > We > > are running Ce...

By the way, on a slightly related note, I'm pretty sure either parallel-readdir or readdir-ahead has a regression in GlusterFS 3.12.x. We are running CentOS 7 with kernel-3.10.0-693.11.6.el7.x86_6. I updated my servers and clients to 3.12.4 and enabled these two options after reading about them in the 3.10.0 and 3.11.0 release notes. In the days after enabling these two options all of my