search for: gluster01

...; Brick4: gluster02:/srv/glusterfs/bricks/DATA204/data > Brick5: gluster02:/srv/glusterfs/bricks/DATA205/data > Brick6: gluster02:/srv/glusterfs/bricks/DATA206/data > Brick7: gluster02:/srv/glusterfs/bricks/DATA207/data > Brick8: gluster02:/srv/glusterfs/bricks/DATA208/data > Brick9: gluster01:/srv/glusterfs/bricks/DATA110/data > Brick10: gluster01:/srv/glusterfs/bricks/DATA111/data > Brick11: gluster01:/srv/glusterfs/bricks/DATA112/data > Brick12: gluster01:/srv/glusterfs/bricks/DATA113/data > Brick13: gluster01:/srv/glusterfs/bricks/DATA114/data > Brick14: gluster02:/srv...

Right now the volume is running with readdir-optimize off parallel-readdir off On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 1:29 AM, Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha at redhat.com> wrote: > Hi Serg, > > Do you mean that turning off readdir-optimize did not work? Or did you > mean turning off parallel-readdir did not work? > > > > On 4 April 2018 at 10:48, Serg Gulko <s.gulko at

Hi, What is the output of 'gluster volume info' for this volume? Regards, Nithya On 23 April 2018 at 18:52, Frank Ruehlemann <ruehlemann at itsc.uni-luebeck.de> wrote: > Hi, > > after 2 years running GlusterFS without bigger problems we're facing > some strange errors lately. > > After updating to 3.12.7 some user reported at least 4 broken > directories

...ya This is what i have so far, I have peer both cluster nodes together as replica, from node 1A and 1B , now when i tried to add it , i get the error that it is already part of a volume. when i run the cluster volume info , i see that has switch to distributed-replica. Thanks Jose [root at gluster01 ~]# gluster volume status Status of volume: scratch Gluster process TCP Port RDMA Port Online Pid ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Brick gluster01ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch 49152 49153 Y 3140 Brick gluste...

Hi, I'm trying to create two gluster volumes over two nodes with two seperate networks: The names are in the hosts file of each node: root at gluster01 :~# cat /etc/hosts 127.0.0.1 localhost 127.0.1.1 gluster01.peiker-cee.de gluster01 10.0.2.54 gluster02g1.peiker-cee.de gluster02g1 10.0.7.54 gluster02g2.peiker-cee.de gluster02g2 10.0.2.53 gluster01g1.peiker-cee.de gluster01g1 10.0.7.53 gluste...

...nodes together as > replica, from node 1A and 1B , now when i tried to add it , i get the error > that it is already part of a volume. when i run the cluster volume info , i > see that has switch to distributed-replica. > > Thanks > > Jose > > > > > > [root at gluster01 ~]# gluster volume status > Status of volume: scratch > Gluster process TCP Port RDMA Port Online > Pid > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------ > Brick gluster01ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch 49152 49153...

...buted-Replicated Volume consisting of 4 bricks on 2 servers. # gluster volume create glusterfs replica 2 transport tcp \ gluster0{0..1}:/srv/gluster/exp0 gluster0{0..1}:/srv/gluster/exp1 Now I have the following very nice replication schema: +-------------+ +-------------+ | gluster00 | | gluster01 | +-------------+ +-------------+ | exp0 | exp1 | | exp0 | exp1 | +------+------+ +------+------+ | | | | +------+----------+ | | | +-----------------+ If one HD goes down, I'm backed! I'm even backed if one serve...

Hi, Please let us know what commands you ran so far and the output of the *gluster volume info* command. Thanks, Nithya On 9 January 2018 at 23:06, Jose Sanchez <josesanc at carc.unm.edu> wrote: > Hello > > We are trying to setup Gluster for our project/scratch storage HPC machine > using a replicated mode with 2 nodes, 2 bricks each (14tb each). > > Our goal is to be

Hello We are trying to setup Gluster for our project/scratch storage HPC machine using a replicated mode with 2 nodes, 2 bricks each (14tb each). Our goal is to be able to have a replicated system between node 1 and 2 (A bricks) and add an additional 2 bricks (B bricks) from the 2 nodes. so we can have a total of 28tb replicated mode. Node 1 [ (Brick A) (Brick B) ] Node 2 [ (Brick A) (Brick

Hi Nithya Thanks for helping me with this, I understand now , but I have few questions. When i had it setup in replica (just 2 nodes with 2 bricks) and tried to added , it failed. > [root at gluster01 ~]# gluster volume add-brick scratch replica 2 gluster01ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch gluster02ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch > volume add-brick: failed: /gdata/brick2/scratch is already part of a volume and after that, I ran the status and info in it and on the status i get just the two brikcs > Bri...

...Cc: gluster-users <gluster-users at gluster.org> > > > Hi Nithya > > Thanks for helping me with this, I understand now , but I have few > questions. > > When i had it setup in replica (just 2 nodes with 2 bricks) and tried to > added , it failed. > > [root at gluster01 ~]# gluster volume add-brick scratch replica 2 >> gluster01ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch gluster02ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch >> volume add-brick: failed: /gdata/brick2/scratch is already part of a >> volume >> > > Did you try the add brick operation several times with the sam...

Hi, we have 4 test machines (gluster01 to gluster04). I've created a replicated volume with the 4 machines. Then on the client machine i've executed: mount -t glusterfs gluster01:/volume01 /mnt/gluster And everything works ok. The main problem occurs in every client machine that I do: umount /mnt/gluster and the mount -t...

Hi, after 2 years running GlusterFS without bigger problems we're facing some strange errors lately. After updating to 3.12.7 some user reported at least 4 broken directories with some invisible files. The files are at the bricks and don't start with a dot, but aren't visible in "ls". Clients still can interact with them by using the explicit path. More information:

...ithya Balachandran <nbalacha at redhat.com> Cc: gluster-users <gluster-users at gluster.org> Hi Nithya Thanks for helping me with this, I understand now , but I have few questions. When i had it setup in replica (just 2 nodes with 2 bricks) and tried to added , it failed. [root at gluster01 ~]# gluster volume add-brick scratch replica 2 > gluster01ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch gluster02ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch > volume add-brick: failed: /gdata/brick2/scratch is already part of a volume > Did you try the add brick operation several times with the same bricks? If yes, that could b...

Hi all Question 1: I follow this instruction https://github.com/gluster/gluster-block, I use 2 gluster01 (192.168.101.110), gluster02 (192.168.101.111) and create one gluster volume (block-storage). And use gluster-block to create block storage (block-store/win) [root at gluster01 ~]# gluster-block create block-store/win ha 2 192.168.101.110,192.168.101.111 40GiB IQN: iqn.2016-12.org.gluster-block:5b...

Hello Karthik Im having trouble adding the two bricks back online. Any help is appreciated thanks when i try to add-brick command this is what i get [root at gluster01 ~]# gluster volume add-brick scratch gluster02ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch/ volume add-brick: failed: Pre Validation failed on gluster02ib. Brick: gluster02ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch not available. Brick may be containing or be contained by an existing brick I have run the following commands and remove...

...t before removing it. i >> believe the same copy of data is on all 4 bricks, we would like to keep one >> of them, and add the other bricks as extra space >> >> Thanks for your help on this >> >> Jose >> >> >> >> >> >> [root at gluster01 ~]# gluster volume info scratch >> >> Volume Name: scratch >> Type: Distributed-Replicate >> Volume ID: 23f1e4b1-b8e0-46c3-874a-58b4728ea106 >> Status: Started >> Snapshot Count: 0 >> Number of Bricks: 2 x 2 = 4 >> Transport-type: tcp,rdma >> Br...

Looking at the logs , it seems that it is trying to add using the same port was assigned for gluster01ib: Any Ideas?? Jose [2018-04-25 22:08:55.169302] I [MSGID: 106482] [glusterd-brick-ops.c:447:__glusterd_handle_add_brick] 0-management: Received add brick req [2018-04-25 22:08:55.186037] I [run.c:191:runner_log] (-->/usr/lib64/glusterfs/3.8.15/xlator/mgmt/glusterd.so(+0x33045) [0x7f5464b9...

...ssages. Also I need to know what are the bricks that were actually removed, the command used and its output. On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 3:47 AM, Jose Sanchez <josesanc at carc.unm.edu> wrote: > Looking at the logs , it seems that it is trying to add using the same port > was assigned for gluster01ib: > > > Any Ideas?? > > Jose > > > > [2018-04-25 22:08:55.169302] I [MSGID: 106482] > [glusterd-brick-ops.c:447:__glusterd_handle_add_brick] 0-management: > Received add brick req > [2018-04-25 22:08:55.186037] I [run.c:191:runner_log] > (-->/usr/lib64/glu...

...know what are the bricks that were actually removed, > the command used and its output. > > On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 3:47 AM, Jose Sanchez <josesanc at carc.unm.edu> wrote: >> Looking at the logs , it seems that it is trying to add using the same port >> was assigned for gluster01ib: >> >> >> Any Ideas?? >> >> Jose >> >> >> >> [2018-04-25 22:08:55.169302] I [MSGID: 106482] >> [glusterd-brick-ops.c:447:__glusterd_handle_add_brick] 0-management: >> Received add brick req >> [2018-04-25 22:08:55.18603...