Displaying 16 results from an estimated 16 matches for "globalref".
Did you mean:
global_ref
2013 Sep 25
1
[LLVMdev] arm64 / iOS support
...Fixup = AArch64II::MO_GOT_LO12;
+ Alignment = 8;
+ } else {
+ HiFixup = AArch64II::MO_NO_FLAG;
+ LoFixup = AArch64II::MO_LO12;
+ }
+
+ // AArch64's small model demands the following sequence:
+ // ADRP x0, somewhere
+ // ADD x0, x0, #:lo12:somewhere ; (or LDR directly).
+ SDValue GlobalRef = DAG.getNode(AArch64ISD::WrapperSmall, dl, PtrVT,
+ DAG.getTargetGlobalAddress(GV, dl, PtrVT, 0,
+ HiFixup),
+ DAG.getTargetGlobalAddress(GV, dl, PtrVT, 0,
+...
2014 May 04
12
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Benchmarking subset of the test suite
...ned_cleanup
SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/recursive-throw
SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/simple_rethrow
SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/simple_throw
SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/throw_rethrow_test
SingleSource/Regression/C++/fixups
SingleSource/Regression/C++/global_ctor
SingleSource/Regression/C/globalrefs
SingleSource/Regression/C++/global_type
SingleSource/Regression/C++/ofstream_ctor
SingleSource/Regression/C/pointer_arithmetic
SingleSource/Regression/C++/pointer_member
SingleSource/Regression/C++/pointer_method
SingleSource/Regression/C++/pointer_method2
SingleSource/Regression/C/PR10189
SingleS...
2012 Feb 19
2
[LLVMdev] Problem While Running Test Suite
...ngleSource/Regression/C/2003-05-14-initialize-string | * | * |
SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-05-23-TransparentUnion | * | * |
SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-05-21-UnionBitfields | * | * |
SingleSource/Regression/C/globalrefs | * | * |
SingleSource/Regression/C/PR640 | * | * |
SingleSource/Regression/C/callargs | * | * |
SingleSource/Regression/C/sumarray...
2008 Feb 03
0
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
...0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/casts | 0.0078 4252 0.0194 * 0.0190 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.02 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/globalrefs | 0.0035 1008 0.0042 * 0.0040 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/matrixTranspose | 0.0103 1356 0.0069 * 0....
2007 Sep 18
0
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
...0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/casts | 0.0120 4304 0.0200 * 0.0200 | 0.00 0.01 0.00 * 0.03 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/globalrefs | 0.0080 1008 0.0040 * 0.0040 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/matrixTranspose | 0.0080 1292 0.0040 * 0....
2008 Jan 24
6
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
LLVMers,
The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/
If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following:
1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release
(default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both.
2) Run 'make check'.
3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'.
4) When
2007 Sep 18
0
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
...0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/casts | 0.0076 4296 0.0155 * 0.0173 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.03 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/globalrefs | 0.0038 1000 0.0100 * 0.0032 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/matrixTranspose | 0.0097 1304 0.0066 * 0....
2008 Jan 28
0
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
...0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/casts | 0.0032 4324 0.0122 * * | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * * | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/globalrefs | 0.0014 1052 0.0026 * 0.0026 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/matrixTranspose | 0.0045 1432 0.0030 * 0....
2009 Oct 20
1
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
... 0.01 | - - n/a n/a
> SingleSource/Regression/C/casts |
> 0.0000 3612 0.0100 * 0.0100 | 0.00 0.00
> 0.00 * 0.03 | - - n/a n/a
> SingleSource/Regression/C/globalrefs |
> 0.0000 932 0.0000 * 0.0000 | 0.01 0.00
> 0.01 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a
> SingleSource/Regression/C/matrixTranspose |
> 0.0100 1364 0.0100 * ...
2009 Oct 20
0
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
Hi Tanya,
> 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects
> directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a
> pre-compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself.
I compiled llvm and llvm-gcc with separate objects directories.
Platform is x86_64-linux-gnu.
> 2) Run make check, report any failures (FAIL or unexpected pass). Note
> that you need to
2009 Oct 20
1
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
...- n/a n/a
> SingleSource/Regression/C/
> casts | 0.0000 3612
> 0.0100 * 0.0100 | 0.00 0.00 0.00
> * 0.03 | - - n/a n/a
> SingleSource/Regression/C/
> globalrefs | 0.0000 932
> 0.0000 * 0.0000 | 0.01 0.00 0.01
> * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a
> SingleSource/Regression/C/
> matrixTranspose | 0.0100 1364
> 0...
2007 Sep 15
22
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
LLVMers,
The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/
I'm looking for members of the LLVM community to test the 2.1
release. There are 2 ways you can help:
1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0
binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make
TEST=nightly report).
2) Download
2009 Oct 17
12
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
LLVMers,
2.6 pre-release2 is ready to be tested by the community.
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.6/
If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release.
To test llvm-gcc:
1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects
directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a pre-
compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself.
2) Run make check,
2009 Feb 07
11
[LLVMdev] 2.5 Pre-release1 available for testing
LLVMers,
The 2.5 pre-release is available for testing:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.5/
If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release.
Please do the following:
1) Download/compile llvm source, and either compile llvm-gcc source or
use llvm-gcc binary (please compile llvm-gcc with fortran if you can).
2) Run make check, send me the testrun.log
3) Run "make
2014 Jan 28
3
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
Hi Stepan,
Sorry for the delay. It's great that you are working on MergeFunctions
as well and I agree, we should definitely try to combine our efforts to
improve MergeFunctions.
Just to give you some context, the pass (with the similar function
merging patch) is already being used in a production setting. From my
point of view, it would be better if we focus on improving its
capability
2014 Jan 30
3
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
...1 0.01 87942
gim_contact.ll 46 97523 3 0.01 95999 1 0.02 96837
gim_memory.ll 13 9669 0 0.01 9651 0 0.01 9651
gimpel.ll 1 32442 0 0.01 32412 0 0.01 32412
gim_tri_collision.ll 17 269009 1 0.03 268577 1 0.03 268577
global_ctor.ll 8 5490 0 0.01 5474 0 0.01 5474
global.ll 0 5240 0 0.01 5220 0 0.01 5220
globalrefs.ll 2 7312 0 0.01 7300 0 0.01 7300
globals.ll 0 4538 0 0.01 4505 0 0.01 4505
global_type.ll 1 1090 0 0.01 1074 0 0.01 1074
gmain.ll 1 31824 0 0.01 31791 0 0.01 31791
good.ll 5 53954 0 0.01 53923 0 0.02 53923
goverlapf.ll 1 48177 0 0.01 48144 0 0.01 48144
goverlap.ll 1 45091 0 0.01 45058 0 0.01 4505...