Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "global1".
Did you mean:
global
2015 Mar 04
2
[LLVMdev] Google Summer of Code
Please provide a patch to Open Projects list.
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 8:25 PM, Vassil Vassilev <vvasilev at cern.ch> wrote:
> On 17/02/15 09:47, Anton Korobeynikov wrote:
>>
>> John,
>>
>> Yes, I'm taking care about application as usual.
>
> I saw the the LLVM mentoring org was accepted. Congrats!
> Anton, could you tell me what is the procedure of
2002 Oct 06
0
[LLVMdev] Minor change in LLVM semantics
I just updated the linux "llvm-gcc" to work with a new, correct, model for
global variable initialization. This does not change the LLVM api in any
way, but it does change the "meaning" of some programs.
Before, if you compiled the following C code:
int global1;
extern int global2;
int global3 = 0;
You would get LLVM code that looked like this:
%global1 = uninitialized global int
%global2 = uninitialized global int
%global3 = global int 0
This is obviously bad, because there was no way to know whether or not a
variable was uninitialized or external, and...
2009 Mar 31
2
scope of variables in R
I need to allocate (using C nomenclature) a set of "global" variables, some integer scalars and some double vectors.
I have placed the name of such variables in the file containing the main script and the called functions:
# ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
# --------------------------- GLOBAL DATA & CONSTANTS ----------------------
2015 Mar 09
2
[LLVMdev] Google Summer of Code
+Easily, some of the code snippets end up being copied dozens of
+times, which leads to worse maintainability, understandability and logical
+design.
The project description stresses code maintainability and logical design more than bug finding due to omissions in copy and pasted code. Reading this made me think of a check that would suggest people to replace copy and pasted code with a function
2015 Mar 11
2
[LLVMdev] Google Summer of Code
> On Mar 11, 2015, at 2:14 AM, Vassil Vassilev <vvasilev at cern.ch> wrote:
>
> On 10/03/15 19:13, Anna Zaks wrote:
>>
>>> On Mar 10, 2015, at 1:03 AM, Vassil Vassilev <vvasilev at cern.ch <mailto:vvasilev at cern.ch>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 09/03/15 21:52, Anna Zaks wrote:
>>>>
>>>> +Easily, some of the code
2015 Jan 29
5
[LLVMdev] RFC: Proposal for Poison Semantics
On 01/28/2015 07:02 AM, Sean Silva wrote:
> Could you maybe provide an example where replacing `%always_poison`
> with `undef` will change the meaning? At least for me, the thing that
> I'm most unclear about is how poison differs from undef.
I will second this request for much the same reason.
>
> -- Sean Silva
>
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 2:50 AM, David Majnemer
>