search for: glibc_post_upgrade

On 12/15/2015 08:51 AM, Greg Lindahl wrote: > The change was made years ago. From the lack of screaming, you can > tell that rpm is being reasonably clever about it. I can find no evidence that rpm does anything of the sort. httpd restarts on upgrade because its maintainers included a command to do so in the %posttrans scriptlet. > Apache, for example, checks its config syntax before

From: Ralph Angenendt <ra+centos at br-online.de> > If you can read binary :) > The script section of the glibc RPM is a very simple one: > [angenenr at shutdown dict]$rpm -q --scripts glibc > postinstall program: /usr/sbin/glibc_post_upgrade.i686 > postuninstall program: /sbin/ldconfig > And I cannot find Documentation for glibc_post_upgrade at the moment, a > "strings" on that binary doesn't really help either. I'll look through the source. Looks like it may be a bit more involved than just a simple SIGHUP...

From: Simon Perreault <nomis80 at lqt.ca> > Sure, theoretically it would be possible, but how would you restart this one? > [nomis80 at poste10-153 ~]$ sudo lsof | grep libc | grep init > init 1 root mem REG 253,0 1521500 999437 /lib/tls/libc-2.3.5.so I need to verify the post-install script for the glibc RPM, but I believe it SIGHUPs the process -- and

...Transaction Test Transaction Test Succeeded Running Transaction Updating : libgcc ####################### [ 1/12] Updating : glibc-common ####################### [ 2/12] Updating : glibc ####################### [ 3/12] /usr/sbin/glibc_post_upgrade: While trying to execute /usr/sbin/iconvconfig.i686 child terminated abnormally error: %post(glibc-2.5-18.fc6.i686) scriptlet failed, exit status 115 Installing: cpp ####################### [ 4/12] error: %post(cpp-4.1.2-13.fc6.i386) scriptlet failed, signal 11 error: %pr...

On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 09:40:44PM +0530, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: > Hm..it's been 10 mins..I don't see anything more in the file where I > redirected stdout of 'febootstrap' cmd. > > Roughly, can you guess how much time this takes? For me it has so far taken a lot longer. The problem is that the number of dependent packages is probably 100s. If you want something

Main reason for refactor is no ovirt-node-image binary image allowed in fedora. Removed ks files, now in ovirt-node-recipe, which is subpackage of ovirt-node. Removed tools, these are now in ovirt-node-recipe which is subpackage of ovirt-node.

Main reason for refactor is no ovirt-node-image binary image allowed in fedora. Moves tools and kickstart files form ovirt-node-image to subpackage ovirt-node-recipe. Removes old sub packages form ovirt-node, stateless, logos, selinux. Modifies init scripts to meet Fedora packaging guidelines: added status, reload, and lockfile, rhbz: 514221 Added License file.

This introduces support to run P2V without X server. Runtime parameters are specified via kernel command line making it hopefully suitable for automated migration with a little help of PXE boot. Patchset is not squashed and represents dev. history.