search for: glibc_linux_dns_vulern

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "glibc_linux_dns_vulern".

2016 Feb 17
5
New glibc for CentOS-6 and CentOS-7 and CVE-2015-7547
...E-2015-7547 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293532 Can't stress how important this update is .. here are a couple stories: http://arstechnica.com/security/2016/02/extremely-severe-bug-leaves-dizzying-number-of-apps-and-devices-vulnerable/ http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/02/16/glibc_linux_dns_vulernability/ Please note that the ONLY way this is tested to work is with ALL updates from CentOS-6 or CentOS-7 applied along with the glibc updates. So a yum update with base and updates repo enabled is the ONLY tested scenario. Did I say *ONLY* enough? Thanks, Johnny Hughes -------------- next pa...
2016 Feb 17
0
New glibc for CentOS-6 and CentOS-7 and CVE-2015-7547
...show_bug.cgi?id=1293532 > > Can't stress how important this update is .. here are a couple > stories: > > http://arstechnica.com/security/2016/02/extremely-severe-bug-leaves-dizzying-number-of-apps-and-devices-vulnerable/ > > > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/02/16/glibc_linux_dns_vulernability/ > > Please note that the ONLY way this is tested to work is with ALL > updates from CentOS-6 or CentOS-7 applied along with the glibc > updates. So a yum update with base and updates repo enabled is the > ONLY tested scenario. Did I say *ONLY* enough? > > Thanks, Jo...
2016 Feb 17
0
New glibc for CentOS-6 and CentOS-7 and CVE-2015-7547
...la.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293532 > > Can't stress how important this update is .. here are a couple stories: > > http://arstechnica.com/security/2016/02/extremely-severe-bug-leaves-dizzying-number-of-apps-and-devices-vulnerable/ > > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/02/16/glibc_linux_dns_vulernability/ > > Please note that the ONLY way this is tested to work is with ALL updates > from CentOS-6 or CentOS-7 applied along with the glibc updates. So a > yum update with base and updates repo enabled is the ONLY tested > scenario. Did I say *ONLY* enough? > > Thanks, >...
2016 Feb 17
4
New glibc for CentOS-6 and CentOS-7 and CVE-2015-7547
...t; >> Can't stress how important this update is .. here are a couple >> stories: >> >> http://arstechnica.com/security/2016/02/extremely-severe-bug-leaves-dizzying-number-of-apps-and-devices-vulnerable/ >> >> >> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/02/16/glibc_linux_dns_vulernability/ >> >> Please note that the ONLY way this is tested to work is with ALL >> updates from CentOS-6 or CentOS-7 applied along with the glibc >> updates. So a yum update with base and updates repo enabled is the >> ONLY tested scenario. Did I say *ONLY* enough? &...