search for: glibc2.1

sean@compu-aid.com wrote: > > To any one who is using Red Hat Linux 6.0 (or, presumably, any glibc2.1 > system) > > I recently installed a new RH 6.0 system on Intel. After installing my > samba and my network application I noticed that I was experiencing oplock > problems that were not present with the same version of Samba on my RH 5.2 > systems and caused my

Hi all, I have made a RedHat 6.0 i386 binary rpm of 2.0.4b with the glibc2.1 configuration fix available at : ftp:<samba.org mirror>/pub/samba/Binary_Packages/redhat/RPMS/6.0/samba-2.0.4b-19990527.i386.rpm This rpm is to be preferred over the one on the RedHat 6.0 cd as it contains an autoconf configuration test to work around the glibc2.1 bug w.r.t. 64 bit locking (the one that

To any one who is using Red Hat Linux 6.0 (or, presumably, any glibc2.1 system) I recently installed a new RH 6.0 system on Intel. After installing my samba and my network application I noticed that I was experiencing oplock problems that were not present with the same version of Samba on my RH 5.2 systems and caused my application to not function. Since the problem seems to be with oplocks I

On 04/21/2017 12:11 PM, Lamar Owen wrote: > ... > The latest version of libc5 I know of that was shipped by Red Hat is > in RHL 6.2, libc-5.3.12. (There is a 5.4, but not sure of stability > or compatibility). > ... > I've successfully set up the bridging; a CentOS 7 VM on the same host > has full connectivity. So it's something about the rtl8139 and the >

fhsmith@logicsouth.com wrote: > > This is a follow up to an item placed on the comp.protocols.smb newsgroup. I have tried tweaking all of the settings until my face turns blue, so here goes: > > System is RedHat 6.0 - Linux Kernel 2.2.5-1. Samba 2.0.4b. > > Here is the gist of the problem (also posted on newsgroup). > > have a Samba server and about 10 Win95 machines

Jim@Morris.net wrote: > I have finally tracked down the reason I am experiencing problems with > DBase files on Samba file servers - initially Redhat 6, and now on > Caldera OpenLinux 2.2 as well. Great debugging work ! > The DOS client code uses a DBase library called CodeBase to access the > DBase files. When a record is appended to a file, the underlying C > code does the

This is great news since I too have this problem. One question please. Could this be causing a problem where a win98 machine cannot write new files to the samba share (but can read and edit a file just fine)? Other win95 machines can write just fine to this share. Rehat 6.0 w/ stock samba (sorry don't know it and don't have access right now) thanks charles >Someone else has

I have an application with is binary-only, does its job well, and is only available for either libc5 (!) or early early glibc2.0 (!!). It has been running on a Red Hat Linux 5.2 (NOT RHEL; RHL) server for a really long time, and it honestly does its job and it's not easily replaced by an open-source solution at the moment. So, I need to do one of the following things: 1.) Run Red Hat

Hello there, I have a serious file locking problem with samba on a RH6 based Linux machine. >From the exported share a database files are being requested. Problem is, only one client can access these - and even only one client can initialize the database query engine, which is btrieve 6.15 workstation engine. The same problem affects .doc files. If one client has an open document, the file is

I have downloaded samba-3.0.0.tar.bz2 (and samba-latest.tar.gz) and attempted to run "./configure --with-ldapsam --with-winbind --with-pam_smbpass --with-smbmount --with-ads --with-ldap" Only to find that ./configure complains of a missing ldap.h file. Does anyone else have this issue? I'm trying to do a simple setup to having a Linux box communicate to my Windows 2000 Server PDC,

Mattc@genesis2000.com wrote: > > The program is the one our comany makes, called Genesis 2000 for windows. I > am currently engaged on testing for this on the Samba server platofrm. I am > using the built-in samba package on Linux Mandrake 6.0. Smbd ver 2.0.3. > > We experience problems with file locking. Our program is based on dbase > technology, running clipper command

Hi there all, I am trying to compile samba-2.0.6 in Solaris 2.6 on a SPARC processor. Running configure gives the following error: checking for fcntl locking... no checking for broken (glibc2.1/x86) 64 bit fcntl locking... no checking for 64 bit fcntl locking... no . . . checking configure summary ERROR: No locking available.

In trying to install samba 2.0.6 on my mklinux system, I'm running into a lot of compiler messages about redifinitions while compiling any of the smbfs utils. The current state of mklinux is back several versions from the "regular" linux kernel, but is using glibc2.1. I understand smbsh is the preferred way to go instead of smbfs, but I also understand that smbsh is broken under

Hello, we are trying to upgrade from 2.0.5a to 2.0.6 (under Digital Unix and Windows 95 clients). After the upgrade we get a lot of errors like these: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Log <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< Jan 4 16:18:35 fissio smbd[31799]: [2000/01/04 16:18:35, 0] smbd/service.c:make

The Samba Team is pleased to announce Samba 2.0.5. This is the latest stable release of Samba. This is the version that all production Samba servers should be running for all current bug-fixes. Please read the "IMPORTANT NOTE" section of the release notes as this explains three security bugfixes which have been added in this release. It is vital that Samba admins understand these

The Samba Team is pleased to announce Samba 2.0.6. This is the latest stable release of Samba. This is the version that all production Samba servers should be running for all current bug-fixes. It may be fetched via ftp from : ftp://ftp.samba.org/pub/samba/samba-2.0.6.tar.gz Or just follow the link on the main page of your nearest http://samba.org mirror. Binary packages for supported systems

We recently committed to replacing our Netware server with a Samba server running on an old SPARC box (using RedHat 6.0). This seemed like a good idea at the time, but now I'm wondering... We have two labs of PCs (each of 16 machines, all running Windows 95) and we use PC-Rdist to ensure that the hard disk images on the PCs are kept fairly clean and up-to-date. The master disk images are

The Samba Team is pleased to announce Samba 2.0.7. This is the latest stable release of Samba. This is the version that all production Samba servers should be running for all current bug-fixes. This version has been tested against Windows 2000 and has no *known* issues with that release of Windows. It may be fetched via ftp from : ftp://ftp.samba.org/pub/samba/samba-2.0.7.tar.gz Or just follow

Hi, I'm trying to build samba 2.0.5a on Red Hat 5.2. It originally came with 1.9something, which seemed to have some bugs accessing large mounted directories. I downloaded Red Hat's updates package, but unfortunately it only comes with smbclient and smbd, and what I need is smbmount and smbumount. My binaries from my more recent systems (RH6 and OL2.2) won't run due to

The Samba Team is pleased to announce Samba 2.0.4. This is the latest stable release of Samba. This is the version that all production Samba servers should be running for all current bug-fixes. Samba 2.0.4 now supports the viewing and modification of UNIX security ownership and permissions from the standard Windows NT client security dialog. More details may be found in the NT_Security document