search for: glaring

You are correct... No glare on a PRI W. Kevin Hunt CCIE #11841 www.huntbrothers.com -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-admin@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-admin@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Steven Critchfield Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 3:26 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] "Glare" condition - How well does asteriskhandle?

Hi- I have an upcoming application that requires use of PRI channels that are primarily used for high-volume incoming traffic, but that are to be used for outbound calling as well. Of course, one option is to have dedicated outbound channels reserved, but this is an inefficient use of channel resources. Normally PBX's are designed to have the CPE yield to an incoming call if a particular

A thought occurred to me to on how to further quantify the impact of "glare" on a properly dimensioned trunk group and debunk the ground start glare concern. A cursory traffic analysis clarifies: 1. Assume you have a two-way trunk group, dimensioned for average busy hour, average busy season for P01 grade of service, Erlang B or Poison distribution. 2. Further assume that the

How I change my configuration to reduce this issue. I have this setting on my zapata.conf signalling=fxs_ks group=1 callgroup=1 pickupgroup=1 channel=1 signalling=fxs_ks group=2 callgroup=1 pickupgroup=1 channel=2; singalling=fxs_ks group=3 callgroup=1 pickupgroup=1 channel=3; singalling=fxs_ks group=4 callgroup=1 pickupgroup=1 channel=4 and for outbound calls I have this context on my

Darren, yes, I'd be happy to help. I'll contact you off list to sort out the arrangements. I should warn you that it may be a wasted journey for you, as I really dont know if it will exhibit the problem. Tim. "Storer, Darren" <starusers@comgate.tv> wrote: __________ >Hi Tim, > >TP> So it _may_ not be a problem for me as NTL is a patchwork >TP> of

Looks like I have skipped on this, but still - a couple of questions: 1) Why there suddenly is an OrderedHash in ActiveSupport? (this glaring omission from ruby core is present in many apps already) 2) Why it doesn''t match the semantics of Hash respectively? 3) Why it''s #nodoc ? -- Julian ''Julik'' Tarkhanov please send all personal mail to me at julik.nl

Hello, We have a high volume of incoming and outgoing calls that come in via our analog POTS lines connected to FXO cards in an Adtran TA750. This is connected to a T100P. We are using Polycom IP 500's. The problem we are experiencing is, on frequent occasions, when someone dials out, there is another person who has just dialed in. I have had this problem at my house before (without an *

Steven Critchfield <critch@basesys.com> wrote: __________ >On Wed, 2004-05-26 at 14:23, tpanton@attglobal.net wrote: >> On which subject, has anyone else >> got time to work with me on a chan_dialogicGC ? It looks do-able but I am ignorant of how asterisk does threading. > >Do you have GPL drivers for the dialogic card? Follow previous comments >about licensing.

...ere is no (fairly simple) way to make this an >> SMTP service that any email client that supports SMTP can use? > > It already is a normal compliant SMTP submission server. Just the BURL > part is something that requires additional client support. Ok, well, my ignorance is probably glaring here, but what I meant was, the make the BURL/URLAUTH pieces strictly between Dovecot and the backend SMTP server, make it invisible to the Client...

Hello! I've run into a problem where a user is making an outbound call at the same time that an inbound call is being made on the same analog line. It appears that as the zap channel is opened for the outbound call, it is simply answering the inbound call. Obviously, both parties involved in the calling get a bit confused. Previously, it happened only on an occasional basis. However, as this

...st week to do traffic shaping on a production system, object of the exercise was simply to throttle the outgoing traffic. tc qdisc add dev eth4 root tbf rate 300mbit burst 300kb latency 50ms But the server became rather instable, crashing repeatedly without anything in the logs. Can anybody spot glaring mistakes in the tc command above, or tell me what I should have done instead? with kind regards, Bent Terp

Now that's quite interesting - yes, this is a two way span. I thought that the D-channel negotiation that happens before the B-channel is set up would have implicitly avoid the glare condition through signalling the intent-to-use to the resource to the remote end (a-la E&M wink start). So what seems to be happening in my case is my CPE is set for a 'Descending' b channel sequence

Hi all, I''ve been looking at the performance of my fb app and one glaring issue seems to be with the parsing speed of rexml in processing the results. Has anyone looked into porting the facebooker parser from rexml to libxml? If not, any reason I shouldn''t try? Thanks! Yu-Shan. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <...

In doing my testing I''m wondering if maintaining backwards compatability for existing applications is important. The question boils down to this: Are there sufficient applications that are using wxRuby (pre swig) that we should expect to have to support all/most without changes or should we expect that most applications will need to learn the ''new'' ways things

I have to fit a generalized linear model in R, and I have never done this before, so I'm in very much doubt. I have a dataset (of 4036 observations) claims sum grp 1 3852 34570293 1 2 1194 7776468 1 3 3916 26343305 1 4 1258 5502915 1 5 11594 711453346 1 ... there are 4 groups (grp). The task

...’m not completely crazy and didn’t fat finger anything (and to make sure my contact lenses are making me see what I think I’m seeing) and I still get the error. When I do samba-tool spn list web-intranet-macmini, I see the SPN(s) associated with that user, and they are correct. Is there something glaringly obvious I’m missing? Mike

.../reads from the TAP device fail with: "Error while writing to Windows tap device <device ID truncated>: (997) Overlapped I/O operation is in progress" A bit of googling doesn't reveal much except some possible intrusions by a couple of recent Windows KB updates. Is this some glaring failure of my own that I am just not seeing, or have the new updates incapacitated tinc in one way or another? Thanks! -- Adam Del Vecchio -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.tinc-vpn.org/pipermail/tinc/attachments/20141215/80027723...

...> anyway, they're metadata not audio. thanks, josh. i posted without including some obviously useful information... os: osx 10.2.1 fink: latest cvs build apple dev tools: latest (july w/ august patch) i attempted to build flac-1.0.4 via the ./configure; make method. i did not notice any glaring compile time errors and ended up with binaries. those binaries returned, simply "Bus Error" each time I attempted to compress a wav file. Any other information I can provide, I'd be happy to. I'm going to attempt a compile using the osx compile instructions in the readme as soon...

...o/llvmdev > > Hi Devang, Folding a cast is like folding any other operator: If the operand is constant, the cast can be done at compile time. I've made the necessary changes to LLVMFoldingBuilder.h to handle casts and several other operators. I have attached the patch. There is one glaring thing that should be addressed. The #ifdef RICH around code in CreateGEP is there because I'm not familiar with STL enough to figure out how to get an array of pointers out of a vector. :-( If someone could clue me in as to the best way to do this, I'd greatly appreciate it. I've t...

...chocancel=yes echocancelwhenbridged=yes echotraining=600 jitterbuffers=6 amaflags=billing context=from-pstn switchtype=national signalling=pri_cpe channel => 1-23 group=1 channel => 25-47 ; NEW FAX t1 group=3 signaling=em_w context=from-internal channel => 49-72 Thanks for any tips or glaring oversights on my part. JJ __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com