search for: glares

You are correct... No glare on a PRI W. Kevin Hunt CCIE #11841 www.huntbrothers.com -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-admin@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-admin@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Steven Critchfield Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 3:26 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] "Glare" condition - How well does asteriskhandle?

Hi- I have an upcoming application that requires use of PRI channels that are primarily used for high-volume incoming traffic, but that are to be used for outbound calling as well. Of course, one option is to have dedicated outbound channels reserved, but this is an inefficient use of channel resources. Normally PBX's are designed to have the CPE yield to an incoming call if a particular

A thought occurred to me to on how to further quantify the impact of "glare" on a properly dimensioned trunk group and debunk the ground start glare concern. A cursory traffic analysis clarifies: 1. Assume you have a two-way trunk group, dimensioned for average busy hour, average busy season for P01 grade of service, Erlang B or Poison distribution. 2. Further assume that the

How I change my configuration to reduce this issue. I have this setting on my zapata.conf signalling=fxs_ks group=1 callgroup=1 pickupgroup=1 channel=1 signalling=fxs_ks group=2 callgroup=1 pickupgroup=1 channel=2; singalling=fxs_ks group=3 callgroup=1 pickupgroup=1 channel=3; singalling=fxs_ks group=4 callgroup=1 pickupgroup=1 channel=4 and for outbound calls I have this context on my

Darren, yes, I'd be happy to help. I'll contact you off list to sort out the arrangements. I should warn you that it may be a wasted journey for you, as I really dont know if it will exhibit the problem. Tim. "Storer, Darren" <starusers@comgate.tv> wrote: __________ >Hi Tim, > >TP> So it _may_ not be a problem for me as NTL is a patchwork >TP> of

Looks like I have skipped on this, but still - a couple of questions: 1) Why there suddenly is an OrderedHash in ActiveSupport? (this glaring omission from ruby core is present in many apps already) 2) Why it doesn''t match the semantics of Hash respectively? 3) Why it''s #nodoc ? -- Julian ''Julik'' Tarkhanov please send all personal mail to me at julik.nl

Hello, We have a high volume of incoming and outgoing calls that come in via our analog POTS lines connected to FXO cards in an Adtran TA750. This is connected to a T100P. We are using Polycom IP 500's. The problem we are experiencing is, on frequent occasions, when someone dials out, there is another person who has just dialed in. I have had this problem at my house before (without an *

Steven Critchfield <critch@basesys.com> wrote: __________ >On Wed, 2004-05-26 at 14:23, tpanton@attglobal.net wrote: >> On which subject, has anyone else >> got time to work with me on a chan_dialogicGC ? It looks do-able but I am ignorant of how asterisk does threading. > >Do you have GPL drivers for the dialogic card? Follow previous comments >about licensing.

On 12/16/2017, 5:10:14 AM, Stephan Bosch <stephan at rename-it.nl> wrote: > Op 12/14/2017 om 6:07 PM schreef Tanstaafl: >> One other point. >> >> Adding support for something like this that also requires Clients to add >> support for it is just begging for a feature that never gets used. >> >> Stephan, are you sure there is no (fairly simple) way to

Hello! I've run into a problem where a user is making an outbound call at the same time that an inbound call is being made on the same analog line. It appears that as the zap channel is opened for the outbound call, it is simply answering the inbound call. Obviously, both parties involved in the calling get a bit confused. Previously, it happened only on an occasional basis. However, as this

Hi all, I tried last week to do traffic shaping on a production system, object of the exercise was simply to throttle the outgoing traffic. tc qdisc add dev eth4 root tbf rate 300mbit burst 300kb latency 50ms But the server became rather instable, crashing repeatedly without anything in the logs. Can anybody spot glaring mistakes in the tc command above, or tell me what I should have done

Now that's quite interesting - yes, this is a two way span. I thought that the D-channel negotiation that happens before the B-channel is set up would have implicitly avoid the glare condition through signalling the intent-to-use to the resource to the remote end (a-la E&M wink start). So what seems to be happening in my case is my CPE is set for a 'Descending' b channel sequence

Hi all, I''ve been looking at the performance of my fb app and one glaring issue seems to be with the parsing speed of rexml in processing the results. Has anyone looked into porting the facebooker parser from rexml to libxml? If not, any reason I shouldn''t try? Thanks! Yu-Shan. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

In doing my testing I''m wondering if maintaining backwards compatability for existing applications is important. The question boils down to this: Are there sufficient applications that are using wxRuby (pre swig) that we should expect to have to support all/most without changes or should we expect that most applications will need to learn the ''new'' ways things

I have to fit a generalized linear model in R, and I have never done this before, so I'm in very much doubt. I have a dataset (of 4036 observations) claims sum grp 1 3852 34570293 1 2 1194 7776468 1 3 3916 26343305 1 4 1258 5502915 1 5 11594 711453346 1 ... there are 4 groups (grp). The task

Experts— I’m attempting to export a keytab for a created SPN on the AD DC machine but I’m receiving an error: ERROR(runtime): uncaught exception - Key table entry not found File "/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/samba/netcmd/__init__.py", line 175, in _run return self.run(*args, **kwargs) File "/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/samba/netcmd/domain.py", line 129, in

Hello tincers, I was recently trying to add a new Windows client to my tinc network and ran into an interesting error; upon starting tinc I am met with the usual successful startup (debug level 0; detects TAP device; Ready), however it appears that any writes/reads from the TAP device fail with: "Error while writing to Windows tap device <device ID truncated>: (997) Overlapped I/O

On 10/18/2002 12:50 PM, Josh Coalson wrote: >> i configured and built 1.0.4 in osx 10.2. seemed to build fine, but each time >> i attemped to use the newly compiled flac binary I received this error >> >> "bus error" > > not sure about this one. > >> i nabbed the binaries for 1.0.3 and, each time i use flac to compress >> something in

Devang Patel wrote: > On Dec 15, 2007, at 12:15 PM, Richard Pennington wrote: > >> I got the current version of LLVM via svn yesterday and modified my >> code to >> use the LLVMFoldingBuilder. Very nice! >> >> My question is this: I noticed that the folding builder doesn't fold >> some >> operations, e.g. casts. Is there some reason why? If

Hello, I'm trying to set the 3rd span of a new digium quad card as a E&M T1 for Faxes to a Hylafax server. The 1st and 2nd spans are working as PRIs. When I start asterisk, the logs show a signaling error and chan_zap.c dies. I also get an error that it can't read the gains but they are the standard shown below. 2.6 kernel, Debian Stable, * 1.2 svn from feb 2007 my procedure: make