search for: glanzmann

Hello, I try to connect with Active Directory Users and Computers from a W2k16 to a Samba 4.8.3 DC. I get the following error message: https://thomas.glanzmann.de/static/63a3e0ba-8a9d-11e8-891f-f3ff022aacb0/screenshot-x1-2018-07-18-17_12_49.png --------------------------- Active Directory Domain Services --------------------------- Naming information cannot be located because: The procedure number is out of range. Contact your system administrator to v...

Hello Ben, > Are you able to double-check that bisect? I'm not at all sure how > that particular commit could trigger the issue you're seeing. Some of > the others, certainly. It might be worth trying a couple of times > before marking something as "good", in case there's a timing aspect to > the problem. please CC me, otherwise I might not see your

...s not work. I used the following two comands: (infra) [/local/samba-config/common] /local/samba-4.9.1/sbin/winbindd -s /local/samba-config/common/smb.conf (infra) [/local/samba-config/common] /local/samba/sbin/smbd -s /local/samba-config/common/smb.conf You can find the logs here: https://thomas.glanzmann.de/tmp/log.2018-10-13.2212.tgz > > > Please define 'access', as in how are you trying. > > Accessing a guest share (see the config files I posted). > Again, what are you actually doing, browsing the network, connecting > direct to the share, or some other method? Al...

Hello Rowland, > There are actually 4 Samba processes: > samba, only used on a DC and this starts any other required processes. > smbd, this is the cifs process > nmbd, the netbios browsing process > winbind, authentication process > The above is a rather simplistic view, but I hope you get the idea. > on a standalone server, you need the smbd process to be running and

On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 17:25:51 +0200 Thomas Glanzmann via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello, > I try to connect with Active Directory Users and Computers from a > W2k16 to a Samba 4.8.3 DC. I get the following error message: > > https://thomas.glanzmann.de/static/63a3e0ba-8a9d-11e8-891f-f3ff022aacb0/screenshot-x1-2...

...ems to ignore my lock directory: (infra) [/local/samba-config/common] grep gencache_notrans.tdb log/smbd Opening cache file at /local/samba-4.9.1/var/lock/gencache_notrans.tdb Could not get allrecord lock on gencache_notrans.tdb: Locking error Find smb.conf and log files here: https://thomas.glanzmann.de/tmp/samba491standalonefile.tar.gz Cheers, Thomas

Hello, I have in my ssh config: Match host 2.3.4.5 exec "~/bin/connect.sh" ProxyCommand ssh -D 1080 -L8080:1.2.3.4:8080 -p 443 bouncehost -W %h:%p ~/bin/connect.sh: #!/bin/bash if echo | nc -w 1 2.3.4.5 22 | grep -q SSH; then false else true fi So when I can't connect to the system directly it should go over a bounce host but at the same time use a

Hello, I noticed that samba internal dns allows recursive queries from everywhere. I wonder if it is possible to limit recursive queries to certain IPv4 and IPv6 network ranges? Cheers, Thomas

On Sun, Aug 05, 2018 at 02:38:20AM +0200, Thomas Glanzmann wrote: > Hello, > > > but I'm unable to report the bug as I've yet to receive a reply from > > the bugzilla-maintenance at samba.org address containing account details > > to allow me to file it. > > I have the same problem, but run my own mail server. >...

Hello, I used net ads join createcomputer="OU=Computer,OU=ErlF,OU=UNIX,OU=_CentralServices,DC=ww004,DC=glanzmann,DC=net" -W WW004 -U adglth0a to join a samba machine to an active directory. Now I would like to configure in a way that windows clients use a cifs/hostname kerberos ticket to authenticate to the machine. I tried the following settings: [global] workgroup = WW004 netbios name...

On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Thomas Glanzmann <thomas at glanzmann.de> wrote: > Hello Ben, > >> Are you able to double-check that bisect? I'm not at all sure how >> that particular commit could trigger the issue you're seeing. Some of >> the others, certainly. It might be worth trying a couple of times...

Hello, my smb.conf is: [global] workgroup = DIRECTORY interfaces = 10.10.10.1 security = user map to guest = Bad User rndc command = /bin/true [iso] comment = ISO browseable = No public = Yes guest only = Yes writable = No directory = /export/ISO I'm using Debian 9.5 with samba version

On Sat, 13 Oct 2018 16:14:44 +0200 Thomas Glanzmann <thomas at glanzmann.de> wrote: > Hello Rowland, > > > cache directory = /local/samba-config/common/cache > > lock directory = /local/samba-config/common/lock > > log file = /local/samba-config/common/log/%m > > pid directory = /...

On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Ben Skeggs <skeggsb at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Thomas Glanzmann <thomas at glanzmann.de> wrote: >> Hello Ben, >> >>> Are you able to double-check that bisect? I'm not at all sure how >>> that particular commit could trigger the issue you're seeing. Some of >>> the others, certainly. It might be worth tryin...

...0f939c7ca # bad: [457e77b26428ab4a24998eecfb99f27fa4195397] drm/nouveau/bios: add more checks to PRAMIN image fetching git bisect bad 457e77b26428ab4a24998eecfb99f27fa4195397 Than I saw your posting on LKML and tried your fix and your fix resolves my problem on top of Linus tip. Tested-by: Thomas Glanzmann <thomas at glanzmann.de> Cheers, Thomas

On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 18:18:46 +0200 Thomas Glanzmann <thomas at glanzmann.de> wrote: > Hello Rowland, > > > These shouldn't be set or are defaults: > > name resolve order = host > > passdb backend = tdbsam > > security = user > > domain logons = yes > > log level = 3 > > os level = 64 > &...

...Not saying > it will not work, trying to understand how it works if it does ;-) lo is a layer 3 (ip) interface. So everything that speaks ip can talk to it, if you enable routing on the box. So that means in the past I had 32 publically routed addresses in addition to 10.10.10.1 on lo. # infra.glanzmann.de: 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1 link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet 10.10.10.1/32 brd 10.10.10.1 scope global lo:0...

Hello Andrew, > Do you actually have any ethernet interfaces up? Why are you not > binding Samba to that? I do, but I run multiple samba servers on one machine. I have a few active directory controllers bound on a per VLAN basis to different interfaces. And one additional samba just for shares that should serve all VLANs. That is why I have the 10.10.10.1 on the lo interface. I use that

...9;s all. However I was quiet impressed how far samba has become. And how good it works. Can you recommend a book or a documentation to get more familiar with SAMBA AD? Thanks a lot. After your cleanup, I can now use Active Directory Users and Computers. My new Samba Config is here: https://thomas.glanzmann.de/static/63a3e0ba-8a9d-11e8-891f-f3ff022aacb0/smb-v101.conf.cleanedup Cheers, Thomas

Hello Andrew, > I'm also interested in working with someone who is willing to set up a > reproduction (perhaps testing with windows AD) and feed me logs etc. I could do that. Are you planning on implementing a KMS server in Samba similiar to kmspico[1]? [1] https://www.officialkmspico.com/ Cheers, Thomas