Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "gl_recursive_lock_init".
2020 Feb 05
1
[PATCH] properly initialize error_data_lock_list before use
...ror_data_list_lock must be initialized
---
lib/handle.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lib/handle.c b/lib/handle.c
index f61fdbcd3..99a8b8848 100644
--- a/lib/handle.c
+++ b/lib/handle.c
@@ -88,6 +88,7 @@ guestfs_create_flags (unsigned flags, ...)
if (!g) return NULL;
gl_recursive_lock_init (g->lock);
+ gl_lock_init (g->error_data_list_lock);
g->state = CONFIG;
@@ -176,6 +177,7 @@ guestfs_create_flags (unsigned flags, ...)
free (g->append);
guestfs_int_free_error_data_list (g);
gl_tls_key_destroy (g->error_data);
+ gl_lock_destroy (g->error_data_list_...
2015 Jun 16
5
[PATCH threads v2 0/5] Add support for thread-safe handle.
Previous discussion here:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2015-June/thread.html#00048
v2:
- Use a cleanup handler to release the lock.
- Rebase to upstream.
Note I have not fixed the problem(s) with error handling (patch 3).
2017 Jun 27
9
[PATCH v3 0/5] threads: Add support for thread-safe handle.
Previously posted in 2015:
v1: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2015-June/msg00048.html
v2: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2015-June/msg00118.html
I have rebased and tidied up the patches, fixing a few spelling
mistakes, but they are broadly the same as before. I also ran all the
tests, which pass.
As with the previous versions, this makes a change to the API, where
you
2015 Jun 06
7
[PATCH 0/5] Add support for thread-safe handle.
This patch isn't ready to go upstream. In fact, I think we might do a
quick 1.30 release soon, and save this patch, and also the extensive
changes proposed for the test suite[1], to after 1.30.
Currently it is not safe to use the same handle from multiple threads,
unless you implement your own mutexes. See:
http://libguestfs.org/guestfs.3.html#multiple-handles-and-multiple-threads
These
2017 Jul 21
6
[PATCH v3 REPOST 0/5] threads: Add support for thread-safe handle.
Previously posted in 2015:
v1: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2015-June/msg00048.html
v2: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2015-June/msg00118.html
This series was posted about 4 weeks ago:
v3: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00287.html
There is no change in this series except I rebased it against current
upstream head and retested. Last time there