search for: giveth

...finite_loop Is this the best forum to gently nudge in this direction or do I also need to prod the etherboot good people too ? I'm afraid I don't have the low level coding skills to contribute much other than my heartfelt thanks for pxelinux and friends. Cheers, Doug -- The big print giveth and the small print taketh away.

On Mar 12, 2008, at 12:49 PM, Mike Stump wrote: > No. Doh, you know, I was trying to find the quoted wording... What the big print giveth, the small print takes away. Ignore me... I was wrong.

...other than the DHCP filename response. Since I don't have control over our DHCP infrastructure, but do have control over pxelinux, I'd like to some how tell gpxe what to do next without having to rely on the DHCP filename response. Apologies if this is off topic. Doug -- The big print giveth and the small print taketh away.

...file is not present in the pxelinux.cfg directory we present the default config file which contains an extensive menu system. It all works wonderfully well. The limitation was, I fear, on the NetApp implementation of their tftp server and unrelated to pxelinux. Cheers, Doug -- The big print giveth and the small print taketh away.

On Mar 11, 2008, at 8:42 PM, Dale Johannesen wrote: > Looking through the gcc testsuite turned up an interesting edge > case. Let's assume our target leaves a hole for alignment in struct > x, as do x86 and powerpc. Do you think the following code can > validly abort? No. The value of the object referred to be the left hand side must be replaced by the object on the

...HE, &dummy, sizeof (dummy))) to determine whether the kernel used DHCP. My question is, why is there a difference between pxegrub booting Solaris and mboot.c32 ? Any help hugely appreciated! P.S. Apologies for some of the longer lines being wrapped by gmail. Cheers, Doug -- The big print giveth and the small print taketh away.

...y need to Change the NULL entry to a string in cpu_flags_strings table, add a bool in s_cpu_flags and then dmi.c would automagically set the boolean correctly ? I could then modify dmitest to check for Long Mode and achieve my goal. Any help hugely appreciated! Cheers, Doug -- The big print giveth and the small print taketh away.

What speaks for it and which speaks against it that Firewall and squid run on the same machine? Regards Menki ------------------------------------------------------- All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk! Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications in the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more

...r occurred. it lacks an end-user documentation system [like POD], though it does have good package documentation. it does have some unexpected behavior: mymatrix[1:2,] is a matrix, but mymatrix[1:1,] is a numeric. huh? data.table is necessary for reasonably fast data manipulation, but data.table giveth and taketh. it has some really strange unexpected behavior---mydatatable[,1] is not the second column, as one would expect it to be. yes, it is documented, but syntax should be as expected.] /iaw ---- Ivo Welch (ivo.welch at gmail.com) ########################################################...

Well, it has to happen at some point, so I have officially pushed out SYSLINUX 3.72. The big news in this release is of course the ISOLINUX hybrid mode support (a single image which can be booted either from a CD-ROM or from a hard disk/USB stick), but there are plenty of more goodies in here, including the label listing (not technically completion) on the Tab key. As usual, huge thanks to

On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 6:15 PM, Michael Brown via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > Also, not a fork: http://git.ipxe.org/ipxe.git/commitdiff/8406115 A fork is a fork, regardless the reasons behind it (yes, I have some understanding in this case). iPXE is based off of forking further development as of a certain gPXE commit with some backporting of gPXE development to iPXE. --

Would it be worthwhile to implement heuristics to auto-tune ''recordsize'', or would that not be worth the effort? -- Regards, Jeremy

Looking through the gcc testsuite turned up an interesting edge case. Let's assume our target leaves a hole for alignment in struct x, as do x86 and powerpc. Do you think the following code can validly abort? struct x { char c; short s; }; int i; char *p; memset(&X, 0, sizeof(struct x)); memset(&Y, 22, sizeof(struct x)); X = Y; for (i=0, p=(char *)&X;

On Sunday 25 November 2007 12:23, Gordon Henriksen wrote: > On 2007-11-24, at 21:58, Jon Harrop wrote: > > - Garbage collection tuned for functional programming > > http://llvm.org/docs/GarbageCollection.html > > I've been doing some interesting work on this front. Getting Lattner- > cycles to have it reviewed and integrated is probably the biggest > challenge; LLVM