search for: giuseppe_ravasio

On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 09:11:23 +0200 Giuseppe Ravasio <giuseppe_ravasio at ch.modiano.com> wrote: > On 10/20/2017 05:48 PM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > >> So I tried what is suggested in this thread: > >> https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2016-April/thread.html#199609 > > > > I really should have said there that using '...

On 10/23/2017 09:29 AM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > All that using '--use-rfc2307' does is allow the use of rfc2307 > attributes such as 'uidNumber' and 'gidNumber', it does not > populate any of the rfc2307 attributes. > > DCs works slightly different from Unix domain members, they use > 'xidNumber' attributes in idmap.ldb, these attributes

On Tue, 24 Oct 2017 12:27:18 +0200 Giuseppe Ravasio <giuseppe_ravasio at ch.modiano.com> wrote: > On 10/23/2017 10:26 AM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > OK, have you tried asking the Netapp company, 'how do I use this > > with Active Directory' ? > > In this specific case no, but I already tried to open CIFS support > cases bu...

On 10/20/2017 05:48 PM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >> So I tried what is suggested in this thread: >> https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2016-April/thread.html#199609 > > I really should have said there that using '513' wasn't a good idea ;-) ok I'll revert to 100 ;-) > The only way to get the same IDs everywhere is to use the winbind >

On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 16:47:43 +0200 Giuseppe Ravasio <giuseppe_ravasio at ch.modiano.com> wrote: > Sorry for eventually wrong AD terminology! Don't worry about it, it is just confusing when you call a DC, a PDC, call it your first DC or anything, just don't call it a PDC ;-) > > > You haven't fixed the 'xidNumber:100 issue', givi...

On 10/23/2017 10:26 AM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > OK, have you tried asking the Netapp company, 'how do I use this with > Active Directory' ? In this specific case no, but I already tried to open CIFS support cases but at the end they tell me that It works as expected with a MS DC and that Samba DC is not supported by them. I cannot omit that I use Samba because they always

Sorry for eventually wrong AD terminology! > You haven't fixed the 'xidNumber:100 issue', giving 'Domain Users' the > ID of '513' is not a good idea and I think you may have just changed > '100' in idmap.ldb to '513' >From the AD DC (;-)) shell the user was missing the "Domain Users" group and we tought that could be a xidNumber

Hi, we are testing a new AD domain that will replace our old NT4 one, and we are setting up a new cifs vserver of our Netapp filer (running Clustered Dataontap 9.2). The new AD domain was a clean deployment created using "samba-tool domain provision --server-role=dc --use-rfc2307 ...". All seems to work well and the Netapp filer joins the domain without errors and seems to run fine.